Fauci has been developing bio weapons for the Pentagon since 2002. Fauci is going DOWNNN!
(media.communities.win)
π Crime & Fauci πΈ
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (44)
sorted by:
So when I heard this phrase "gain of function" a couple of years ago, I thought to myself, "If they can create a GAIN in a virus's function, what is a virus's basic, innate natural function to begin with?"
I'm not a virologist, but logic dictates that for something to GAIN, it has to exist in the first place. Does anyone know what the "function" of a naturally occurring virus is?
The first time I heard it described, its a very literal term.
Map out how lethal a virus is, what intermediate sickness states it can bring about before death (bleeding from every pore, fevers, insanity, blindness, skin lesions, inability to digest, motor skill impairment and paralysis etc), how it can spread, and how resilient it is at fighting off efforts to kill or neutralise it via antibodies and antibiotics/antifungals.
Anything that adds to that is a gain of function. Becoming airborne when it was not previously so. Killing quicker. Defeating all known medications at higher chances. Propagating itself more efficiently.
Essentially anything that makes it a better weapon.
Ah... ^^ this ^^ actually makes sense. Thanks, anon.
The problem is this: Nobody has ever proven any of this for any virus.
Yes, people gete skin lesions and all the rest, but nobody has ever been able to demonstrate that a "virus" is the cause -- and there have been many attempts with many "viruses" to try and prove it.
So, what are they REALLY spending all that money on?
MOST PEOPLE DO NOT GET THIS FREN π You canβt operate or fight under a false premise
Viruses are dead cell debris, right? So their 'gain of function' was probably trying to actually make a real virus that is alive and carry some kind of contagion to spread and infect people. When that didn't work they made sure to get people to get their poison physically injected right into their bodies.
Adding HIV into the genetic sequence, damaging the immune system.
there is no moral reason to "do" gain of function at all. There's no way to forecast what changes a virus will go through and "gain of function" is an evolutionary science scam.
entropy is the nature of things. nothing gains function. ever. jumping from host to unrelated host is a matter of lose of function. Sure, the new host may suffer, but it's not because the "virus" evolved.
so "gain of function" is their term for finding a way to kill us all. The "virus" couldn't kill human's before, now it can... its their definition of gain of function and is the only reason they do "the science".
Precisely.
I heard that "gain of function" was a way to facilitate the replication and transmission of viruses (if they even existed) from species to species, ie to human beings.
"Gain of function" can be anything a virus wasnt able to do before. If it only spread through physical contact, enabling it to spread via air is a gain of function. If it only spread between Avian species, enabling it to cross into humans (or another species) would be a gain of function. Heck, if it cannot survive in liquid, but you prod it and breed it until it has a variant that survives in liquid that is a gain of function.
Sure, not per se. I meant in this case, hence the "came from a bat or a pengolin" or whatever else. Heck, it could have even come from Fauci's goblin brain.
This is a great observation...