Fauci has been developing bio weapons for the Pentagon since 2002. Fauci is going DOWNNN!
(media.communities.win)
π Crime & Fauci πΈ
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (44)
sorted by:
So when I heard this phrase "gain of function" a couple of years ago, I thought to myself, "If they can create a GAIN in a virus's function, what is a virus's basic, innate natural function to begin with?"
I'm not a virologist, but logic dictates that for something to GAIN, it has to exist in the first place. Does anyone know what the "function" of a naturally occurring virus is?
The first time I heard it described, its a very literal term.
Map out how lethal a virus is, what intermediate sickness states it can bring about before death (bleeding from every pore, fevers, insanity, blindness, skin lesions, inability to digest, motor skill impairment and paralysis etc), how it can spread, and how resilient it is at fighting off efforts to kill or neutralise it via antibodies and antibiotics/antifungals.
Anything that adds to that is a gain of function. Becoming airborne when it was not previously so. Killing quicker. Defeating all known medications at higher chances. Propagating itself more efficiently.
Essentially anything that makes it a better weapon.
Ah... ^^ this ^^ actually makes sense. Thanks, anon.
The problem is this: Nobody has ever proven any of this for any virus.
Yes, people gete skin lesions and all the rest, but nobody has ever been able to demonstrate that a "virus" is the cause -- and there have been many attempts with many "viruses" to try and prove it.
So, what are they REALLY spending all that money on?
MOST PEOPLE DO NOT GET THIS FREN π You canβt operate or fight under a false premise
Viruses are dead cell debris, right? So their 'gain of function' was probably trying to actually make a real virus that is alive and carry some kind of contagion to spread and infect people. When that didn't work they made sure to get people to get their poison physically injected right into their bodies.
Adding HIV into the genetic sequence, damaging the immune system.
there is no moral reason to "do" gain of function at all. There's no way to forecast what changes a virus will go through and "gain of function" is an evolutionary science scam.
entropy is the nature of things. nothing gains function. ever. jumping from host to unrelated host is a matter of lose of function. Sure, the new host may suffer, but it's not because the "virus" evolved.
so "gain of function" is their term for finding a way to kill us all. The "virus" couldn't kill human's before, now it can... its their definition of gain of function and is the only reason they do "the science".
Precisely.
I heard that "gain of function" was a way to facilitate the replication and transmission of viruses (if they even existed) from species to species, ie to human beings.
"Gain of function" can be anything a virus wasnt able to do before. If it only spread through physical contact, enabling it to spread via air is a gain of function. If it only spread between Avian species, enabling it to cross into humans (or another species) would be a gain of function. Heck, if it cannot survive in liquid, but you prod it and breed it until it has a variant that survives in liquid that is a gain of function.
Sure, not per se. I meant in this case, hence the "came from a bat or a pengolin" or whatever else. Heck, it could have even come from Fauci's goblin brain.
This is a great observation...
(1) Make sure you understand the concept of "dual-purpose funding." This means that Fauci can OFFICIALLY fund something (say, learning if hampsters like cheese), and once that money is gifted to the lab/university/foreign country, the money can be used for ANYTHING ELSE instead (say, learning if humans will follow mask orders). Dual-purpose funding means that ANY offical use of government grants can be used for ANYTHING other than what it was officially used for. Therefore, "gain of function reaseach" might be for anything -- literally, anything.
(2) Nobody has EVER demonstrated that a "virus" can be transmitted from a sick person (who it is claimed "has the virus") to another person, and make them sick. This was attempted with Spanish Flu, measles, and other so-called viruses. There was even a 10-year study of married couples, where one partner was supposedly HIV+ and the other HIV-, and over 10 years, with many thousands of sexual acts, NOT ONE person who was HIV- ever became HIV+. Even if a "virus" did exist as a real thing, there is NO EVIDENCE that it is transmissible. This goes for ALL "viruses."
(3) Nobody has EVER been able to isolate and purify a "virus," meaning no person has ever taken a bodily fluid from any human or animal, and extracted a PURE virus from it, with nothing else at all in the sample. More than 100 government agencies and university labs all over the world have confirmed in writing that (a) they do not have such a sample of a "virus," (b) they do not know where any other lab in the world has such a sample, and (c) they do not know of any paper published anywhere that demonstrates that this has EVER been done.
Therefore, what IS "gain of function" research?
Clearly, it means to gain some sort of function. Seems to me to be some sort of bioweapons research. This could be in the form of creating sprays to be sprayed on specific populations, or it could be the creation of drugs that would be directly injected into targeted individuals. Or, it could be something else.
What we can say with confidence is this: It is NOT about an actual virus, because a virus is nothing more than dead cellular debris that shows up in the photographs of an electron microscope as a result of the process used that claims to study a virus. It is not something that could ever be used as a bioweapon to spread "naturally" from one person breathing it out to another person breathing it in.
There is also another possibility, which is that "gain of function research" could be nothing more than a money laundering scheme. These people -- ESPECIALLY Tony Fauci -- are so STUPID that they MIGHT believe that even though they have never been able to prove anything regarding viruses, they believe they can, and so they spend billions to try, and in the process it is "ok" for them if they get rich while trying.
One question that has never been asked, but should be, is this: What "gain of function" result has ever been accomplished from all that money being spent? Even if not from a "virus," what has been any result of any gain of function from all of this money that has been spent on this research?
I have come across several people in my research that universally say Tony Fauci is a true idiot.
Regardless, Fauci is a fraud, and con man, and a criminal who should be prosecuted for his crimes. Either he is too stupid to know what he has been funding, or too evil.
You answered my original question very well, above and beyond. When I posted it, it was partly rhetorical and partly a real question having to do with "what 'function' does any virus actually have?"
Well done, your answer is superb.
There's no such thing as any boogeyman-virus in the first place. Germ theory is a 150-year old psyop.
All their paperwork and lab research are nothing but subterfuge. The patents are just playing off the fake story of the boogeyman-virus. I can get a patent granted for a new magic flying carpet with endless details of how it works, or will work.
The lab work itself is just experimentation with various toxins and chemicals as there is no such thing as a "germ" to "gain fiction" to begin with.
Since a virus in reality doesn't exist, it's a made up invention to scare people, your question is unanswerable.
That is what the Geneva Convention Accords were after the 1st WW...the accords SPECIFICALLY states THAT IF A VIRUS IS FOUND IN NATURE IT CANNOT BE PATENTED, HOWEVER, a VIRUS ANY other way is MAN-MADE...
All of these viruses that we have had since the Aides Epidemic are MAN-MADE AND FAUCI WAS THE HEAD OF IT...
NOTE: A noted biologist in 2018 or thereabouts, named Dr Kerry Curry, has since passed, was asked about Fauci and the PCR test, which Dr Curry DEVELOPED AND RECEIVED THE NOBLE PRIZE...
Fauci went on, just like with COVID, you had to take the treatment plan which included REMDESIVIR.. AND was just like the idiot did with COVID...
Maybe common cold!