I’ll pretty confidently say it’s BS. 200k is well over 2x the largest clinical trial conducted and for what he’s describing, there’s no way you can get 200k qualified participants with that illness. He doesn’t even mention a clinical trial number.
Inquiring minds would like to know if you can provide the source from which you are making this claim. It seems there have been perhaps larger studies. I don't know, but obviously you have the source.
The guy in the video suspiciously lacks any detail that can be followed up on (no condition just describes what the drug does which is odd for a participant, no study number, no sponsor, not even a location). Yes, pharma companies delete/don't report data, but clinical trials are registered BEFORE they begin. Hes claiming NDA so he cant talk about specifics, yet talks about side effects/ dates/# of participants but wont mention anything else? Trial announcements are big news in pharma (Initiation, full enrollment, etc), you can't hide a 200K trial. He even does a follow up video with NO additional info other than getting mad at people who doubt his story.
You presented a plausible case, yet in your polemic you said- "...you can't hide a 200K trial." Where have I heard this type of statement before? I'll tell you this. If there is a will, there is a way. Hiding Manhatten Project types of experiments has been done before. If we look at how long this pandemic was actually planned, the mock pandemic drills, how many dry-runs occurred leading up to this very point were tested, analyzed, and adjusted for, its not out of the realm of possibilities that some very surreptitious studies across America's universities and colleges could occur. I recall back in the 1970s seeing university postings for medical experimental studies all the time. They offered subjects cash to take part in the studies. To a cash-strapped college student, this was a tempting way to earn some extra bucks. The natural compartmentalization of these studies IMHO would be a no-brainer for the summation for of a 200k trial. We know via the patent research work of Dr. David Martin implicating DARPA, the DoD, Moderna, and Pfizer, along with some other government agencies, the mRNA injectoid can be easily traced to 2001 and before.
I don't doubt the veracity of your missive. In the end, we simply don't know for sure. The video of the 2013 mRNA test dude provides too little information for validation. If possible, a deep dive into this matter is warranted.
I don't disagree with much of what you said. I will mention that what we saw with COVID is that hiding the truth is very difficult in this day, you can find trails pretty much everywhere if you look. Making up data is fucking hard, we are not omniscient. The less specific someone is with a claim, the more likely they are trying to bullshit you into believing it, which is what I believe I'm seeing here.
And "not knowing something for sure" is an argument I have grown cold to. The socialists and communists use this all the time to sow the seed of doubt. You can be confident in what you know while at the same time willing to change your mind if new evidence comes to light.
You seemed skeptical about his claim. Good! Trust your judgements.
Unfortunately I wouldn't be surprised since big harma are crunts.
You can't trust anything big harma produce / share because you know it will be way worse / inaccurate.
Unfortunately learned the hard way, thanks Bayer / fda and everyone who covered up the truth. Found out there were deaths in my product. Not shared truthfully of course, secret recordings etc
I don't even know what to say about his claim. This is either BS, or else he is one of only a very few survivors left trying to warn the public about mRNA testing crimes against humanity, and hidden test trials.
Maybe someone with time available can cull through the many results that come up at this link from the National Library of Medicine's 'list of 2013 clinical trials that involve mRNA':
I’ll pretty confidently say it’s BS. 200k is well over 2x the largest clinical trial conducted and for what he’s describing, there’s no way you can get 200k qualified participants with that illness. He doesn’t even mention a clinical trial number.
Inquiring minds would like to know if you can provide the source from which you are making this claim. It seems there have been perhaps larger studies. I don't know, but obviously you have the source.
I can clarify more since I was able to find larger, but not in the US that administered any drug/vaccine.
Largest in the US with a drug/Vaccine Administered - 69274 participants : https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00090233
Largest in the US for a procedure (Mammography) since 2010 - Enrollment not completed, anticipated ~130,000 participants : https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03233191
Internationally there were larger ones including a South Africa COVID Jansen trial vaccine trial with 477,000 "participants" (Phase 3b, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04838795) and an Indian study on childhood mortality from deworming with 720,000 participants (post market, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00222547).
The guy in the video suspiciously lacks any detail that can be followed up on (no condition just describes what the drug does which is odd for a participant, no study number, no sponsor, not even a location). Yes, pharma companies delete/don't report data, but clinical trials are registered BEFORE they begin. Hes claiming NDA so he cant talk about specifics, yet talks about side effects/ dates/# of participants but wont mention anything else? Trial announcements are big news in pharma (Initiation, full enrollment, etc), you can't hide a 200K trial. He even does a follow up video with NO additional info other than getting mad at people who doubt his story.
So yes, I say BS even more so now.
You presented a plausible case, yet in your polemic you said- "...you can't hide a 200K trial." Where have I heard this type of statement before? I'll tell you this. If there is a will, there is a way. Hiding Manhatten Project types of experiments has been done before. If we look at how long this pandemic was actually planned, the mock pandemic drills, how many dry-runs occurred leading up to this very point were tested, analyzed, and adjusted for, its not out of the realm of possibilities that some very surreptitious studies across America's universities and colleges could occur. I recall back in the 1970s seeing university postings for medical experimental studies all the time. They offered subjects cash to take part in the studies. To a cash-strapped college student, this was a tempting way to earn some extra bucks. The natural compartmentalization of these studies IMHO would be a no-brainer for the summation for of a 200k trial. We know via the patent research work of Dr. David Martin implicating DARPA, the DoD, Moderna, and Pfizer, along with some other government agencies, the mRNA injectoid can be easily traced to 2001 and before.
I don't doubt the veracity of your missive. In the end, we simply don't know for sure. The video of the 2013 mRNA test dude provides too little information for validation. If possible, a deep dive into this matter is warranted.
I don't disagree with much of what you said. I will mention that what we saw with COVID is that hiding the truth is very difficult in this day, you can find trails pretty much everywhere if you look. Making up data is fucking hard, we are not omniscient. The less specific someone is with a claim, the more likely they are trying to bullshit you into believing it, which is what I believe I'm seeing here.
And "not knowing something for sure" is an argument I have grown cold to. The socialists and communists use this all the time to sow the seed of doubt. You can be confident in what you know while at the same time willing to change your mind if new evidence comes to light.
You seemed skeptical about his claim. Good! Trust your judgements.
It's all the gut.... this discerning business tis.
Fair point.
This guy is full on mentally ill.
Is he? It seems pretty well articulated.
Unfortunately I wouldn't be surprised since big harma are crunts. You can't trust anything big harma produce / share because you know it will be way worse / inaccurate. Unfortunately learned the hard way, thanks Bayer / fda and everyone who covered up the truth. Found out there were deaths in my product. Not shared truthfully of course, secret recordings etc
I don't even know what to say about his claim. This is either BS, or else he is one of only a very few survivors left trying to warn the public about mRNA testing crimes against humanity, and hidden test trials.
If we hadn't experienced the current trend of massive crisis of myocarditus, how would such a voice as his ever be heard... let alone believed?
Maybe someone with time available can cull through the many results that come up at this link from the National Library of Medicine's 'list of 2013 clinical trials that involve mRNA':
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/?term=2013+%2B+mRNA+%2B+clinical+%2B+trial