Yes, I recall that specific text chain quoted, because it was pretty much the entire case against Sussman and can be found on page TWO of what Durham filed back in April of last year.
Click on the OP text above and in the article there's a link to Durham's filing from last year and on page Two, there is that exact text.
Like I posted above, it's a common tactic for websites such as that to regurgitate old posts to get clicks and ad revenue.
Money. That's why.
The post itself was written a year ago.
All they have to do is "update" it. Which could just mean re-opening the file it's saved under. And then it gets bumped up in newsfeeds and people click on it, thinking it is new and they earn money from that.
It's not uncommon.
When there's an actual update to news articles, the news source will usually make an edit at the bottom telling you what has been changed or added.
The lack of such a thing is why I believe it's just been regurgitated for clicks.
I do recall that some things came out that weren't part of the case or at least the judge didn't allow them to be. perhaps Durham filed a new complaint for matters that weren't tried. I went on Solomons twatter and lots of people saying this is old and no reply yet from John to elucidate, but he just doesn't seem that type to recycle and not have double checked his work
Who knows? They'll probably say it was a glitch or something or they were hacked.
But there is zero info there that is new. Zero. All of it has already been reported on by various sources for over a year. The way back machine shows the article was exactly the same a year ago. There is zero news anywhere else concerning anything new with Durham or Sussman from any where else (that isn't using this as a source).
So......guess someone fucked up. 🤷♀️
Edited to add:
Some Twitter news accounts are automatically set up to send a tweet out whenever that account holder publishes an article.
So maybe someone (interns? Editors?) "accidentally" "updated" or regurgitated that article from last year and it automatically sent out that tweet.
Either way, Anons, who are supposed to be paying attention to this shit, should know that it's not new that it's being called a conspiracy, and should definitely know there was already a trial about it.
Yes, I recall that specific text chain quoted, because it was pretty much the entire case against Sussman and can be found on page TWO of what Durham filed back in April of last year.
Click on the OP text above and in the article there's a link to Durham's filing from last year and on page Two, there is that exact text.
so why the heck is JustTheNews posting this article now?? strange for sure. and written by John Solomon who is pretty solid usually
Like I posted above, it's a common tactic for websites such as that to regurgitate old posts to get clicks and ad revenue.
Money. That's why.
The post itself was written a year ago.
All they have to do is "update" it. Which could just mean re-opening the file it's saved under. And then it gets bumped up in newsfeeds and people click on it, thinking it is new and they earn money from that.
It's not uncommon.
When there's an actual update to news articles, the news source will usually make an edit at the bottom telling you what has been changed or added.
The lack of such a thing is why I believe it's just been regurgitated for clicks.
I do recall that some things came out that weren't part of the case or at least the judge didn't allow them to be. perhaps Durham filed a new complaint for matters that weren't tried. I went on Solomons twatter and lots of people saying this is old and no reply yet from John to elucidate, but he just doesn't seem that type to recycle and not have double checked his work
current Solomon tweet: https://twitter.com/jsolomonReports/status/1640399179741642765
old article: https://twitter.com/southerntails1/status/1640460176162451457
🤷♀️
Who knows? They'll probably say it was a glitch or something or they were hacked.
But there is zero info there that is new. Zero. All of it has already been reported on by various sources for over a year. The way back machine shows the article was exactly the same a year ago. There is zero news anywhere else concerning anything new with Durham or Sussman from any where else (that isn't using this as a source).
So......guess someone fucked up. 🤷♀️
Edited to add:
Some Twitter news accounts are automatically set up to send a tweet out whenever that account holder publishes an article.
So maybe someone (interns? Editors?) "accidentally" "updated" or regurgitated that article from last year and it automatically sent out that tweet.
Either way, Anons, who are supposed to be paying attention to this shit, should know that it's not new that it's being called a conspiracy, and should definitely know there was already a trial about it.