Where are you getting that is new? Because when I look at the article in the Wayback machine from a year ago, it's the same.
Durham also told the court he plans to present evidence that Sussmann worked with the Clinton campaign, tech executive Rodney Joffe,
Why would they add this today, when this is exactly what was reported in other news articles a year ago, and is exactly what he did during the trial, which has been over for awhile now?
Here's one of the six new paragraphs. Show me where this, and the other five paragraphs, are in the article from the Wayback link that you posted.
"Patel, who helped unravel the false Russia collusion narrative with former Rep. Devin Nunes, said the new filing by Durham is one of the most significant in the entire investigation to date."
I didn't post a link to the wayback machine before, but here is one. Not sure how to "show you", other than giving a link and having you read it, so.... 🤷♀️
That's not the wayback machine, and I never claimed it was the same article.
It's not even the same website.
I was using that to show people that Durham was saying that it was a conspiracy a year ago, because it says it right in the headline.
I can't trust that anyone here will go to all the effort of actually reading the entire article. I have to make it as simple as possible and spoon feed it to people.
But apparently that backfired, seeing as how you didn't even bother to check if it was the same news source, or author, or article, or anything.
🤦♀️
JFC, I really don't know why I even bother sometimes. I really don't.
Where are you getting that is new? Because when I look at the article in the Wayback machine from a year ago, it's the same.
Why would they add this today, when this is exactly what was reported in other news articles a year ago, and is exactly what he did during the trial, which has been over for awhile now?
Here's one of the six new paragraphs. Show me where this, and the other five paragraphs, are in the article from the Wayback link that you posted.
"Patel, who helped unravel the false Russia collusion narrative with former Rep. Devin Nunes, said the new filing by Durham is one of the most significant in the entire investigation to date."
I didn't post a link to the wayback machine before, but here is one. Not sure how to "show you", other than giving a link and having you read it, so.... 🤷♀️
https://web.archive.org/web/20220430054444/https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/durham-bombshell-fbi-text-message-shows-clinton-lawyer
That link was what that article looked like on April 30, 2022. Looks exactly the same to me. So, again.....🤷♀️
Edited to add:
But just to Scooby-Doo this shit, why exactly are you thinking those paragraphs are new?
The link you posted twice, and referenced to in your previous posts;
https://www.thefreedomtimes.com/2022/04/05/new-durham-filing-reveals-text-message-from-sussman-joint-venture-or-conspiracy-to-smear-trump/
Did not include those six paragraphs.
Perhaps the reason for your initial confusion?
That's not the wayback machine, and I never claimed it was the same article.
It's not even the same website.
I was using that to show people that Durham was saying that it was a conspiracy a year ago, because it says it right in the headline.
I can't trust that anyone here will go to all the effort of actually reading the entire article. I have to make it as simple as possible and spoon feed it to people.
But apparently that backfired, seeing as how you didn't even bother to check if it was the same news source, or author, or article, or anything.
🤦♀️
JFC, I really don't know why I even bother sometimes. I really don't.