Yea. It's too bad they removed Dixie from their name due to woke bull shit tho. And this: "Alongside the name change, the Chicks released the protest song "March March" with a music video directed by Seanne Farmer, in tribute to social justice movements."
They always have been. Even before the Toby Keith and George Bush controversies, their interviews made clear that they did not like their conservative fans and they were wondering why those people liked them in the first place.
I'd also like to point out that Natalie Maines (the twangy and obnoxious singer) conveniently has a daddy in the country music business. Take that as you will.
You are running up against a different type. One that is here for control of others. You will agree on many things but this fundamental difference will always mean you are about different things.
They were then. Protesting Iraq War was easy. They were the proverbial blind squirrel finding a nut. Same way I feel about Occupy Wall Street. Fighting for the right cause for all the wrong reasons.
Because I think it was led by the same handlers that run BLM, antifa and any other leftist group. It was the same people spreading thier anarcho-tyranny today. They used Wall Street because the great majority of normie conservatives (which was a group an order of magnitude bigger than it is today, many having a least partially redpilled) would push back. I think its important to remember that the target doesnt always matter its the action/reaction, the chaos and fear.
Yea. It's too bad they removed Dixie from their name due to woke bull shit tho. And this: "Alongside the name change, the Chicks released the protest song "March March" with a music video directed by Seanne Farmer, in tribute to social justice movements."
edit: wow, they are completely cucked now:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwBjF_VVFvE
They always have been. Even before the Toby Keith and George Bush controversies, their interviews made clear that they did not like their conservative fans and they were wondering why those people liked them in the first place.
I'd also like to point out that Natalie Maines (the twangy and obnoxious singer) conveniently has a daddy in the country music business. Take that as you will.
If you were to point out everyone in the music or entertainment business who got their foot in the door through nepotism you’ll be here for a while.
They could be administering deadly vaccines to crying children in 2023, the point is their stance in 2003 represents this image.
Unpopular speech turning out to be correct in retrospect is very much related to the principles of free speech.
You are running up against a different type. One that is here for control of others. You will agree on many things but this fundamental difference will always mean you are about different things.
They were then. Protesting Iraq War was easy. They were the proverbial blind squirrel finding a nut. Same way I feel about Occupy Wall Street. Fighting for the right cause for all the wrong reasons.
How was OWS fighting for the wrong reasons? Curious
Because I think it was led by the same handlers that run BLM, antifa and any other leftist group. It was the same people spreading thier anarcho-tyranny today. They used Wall Street because the great majority of normie conservatives (which was a group an order of magnitude bigger than it is today, many having a least partially redpilled) would push back. I think its important to remember that the target doesnt always matter its the action/reaction, the chaos and fear.