I have a concept which I want to share for discussion
I'll call it the Pareto rule of repression, the idea that a certain threshold percentage of opinion must be in place before a repressive policy can be carried out and if that threshold is not met, the policy will be a failure.
For the purposes of explanation. I'll use 90% as an example of this threshold and demnstrate why the MSM and the narrative is so important
I'll also use vaxxed versus unvaxxed, although other differences could be used such as race, religion, or politics, support for foreign intervention etc.
The cabal as hoping to use the vax in order to lockdown society, remove dissenters and institute their "new normal" and they damn near succeeded, but they didn't..
Why?
In my opinion, they had camps built for vax refusers and they would have murdered us in the camps and blamed covid which would further that narrative.
I think the cabal did not reach the threshold of support they required, let's call it 90% where they could retain a functioning society while removing the unvaxxed. There were just too many of us and society would have collapsed without us, both politically and technologically. They need the higher fraction of society to carry out the repression on the lower fraction and if the ratio isn't high enough, the higher fraction do not do it.
The story Gulliver's Travels by Jonathan Swift has a non emotive example of a societal rift where people are divided over which way up to eat their boiled eggs and they will go to war over it. My contention is that the Lilliput MSM and shadow government would need a threshold of let's say 90% of broad end egg eaters in a mixed society before they would repress the pointy enders and 75% just wouldn't cut it, the minions would not comply.
I think that we escaped vax tyranny and genocide because the unvaxxed had a high enough percentage that the cabal plan was just not possible and that white hat, anons and generally awake people tipped the balance.
It's all about the percentage, the MSM, manufacturing consent and narrative.
An awake population cannot be oppressed and would not oppress.
Recently, I felt like I made a mountain out of a molehill by no longer going to a coffee place that started requiring masks 6+ months into the plandemic, but you just reminded me exactly why I fought it so hard.
We’ve moved on to the part where they deny they ever wanted to shut us out of society, even though Pepe Farms ‘membas their calling for it.
Well done fren.
IMO the little actions added up and saved most of humanity.
Absolutely agree! 🎯
Solid post. I think you're on to something, and I agree that if significantly more Americans had been mesmerized by the "vax" propaganda and related pro-tyranny mindsets, those of us ignoring or outright protesting the COVID theater, the "vax", and so on would have been targeted for termination in the camps.
Those camps weren't built for anything else, and history shows that outright mass democide is common. Sauce: Death by Government, by R. J. Rummel, and The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression (the Foreward is titled The Uses of Atrocity), by a group of left-wing scholars who researched every Communist regime of the 20th century.
Thank you fren!
What do you think about the threshold principle? The idea that they needed a certain percentage above which the plan works and below which is doesn't.
I think it's an important part of the equation.
The Second Amendment -- and the percent of the population that is armed and even reasonably competent -- is another. The number and level of corruption of the military and federal, state, and local armed agents is another; a widespread understanding of freedom and of tyranny (and their effects) is important for effective resistance, and there are more factors.
But I think you've identified a good proxy for estimating the danger of a successful boost of tyranny by the ruling regime. When enough of the population has been gaslit or whatever into believing the cover story for the heavier tyranny being imposed, the danger of that tyranny succeeding is very high.
Yes, you've pointed out the second amendment which really changes the environment and would radically change the percentages needed to repress.
Interesting post. And yes, for a psy-op to work I'm certain that there is some measure of penetration expressed as a percentage of adherents for the psy-op to work.
But then again, I have to remind everyone that the American Revolution was fought by only 3% of the Colonists, and that turned out rather well.
Yes, I was thinking about that as well. But the American Revolution was out in the open and was not "mostly peaceful" which is what they are aiming for here.
"Mostly peaceful" might be what many are aiming for ... but I would suggest that we all keep our powder dry just in case the other side doesn't cooperate with "mostly peaceful." Just sayin'....
A couple of thoughts in no coherent order that are at least somewhat tangential.
Fear and exhaustion makes people makes people easier to manipulate, its how cults and brainwashing works, its how interrogations work, its even how new military recruits are broken down to be rebuilt to follow orders and maintain the cohesion of their squad above personal concerns. Regarding the vax, the fake-pressure tactic for sure was done to bully people into accepting madness, and there are leaks showing it was wargamed in smaller group studies before the most successful strategies were then employed in the wider population. Telling them that they are killing their families and loved ones if they dont take the shot etc, all the nonsense was planned. Documented in parent link of posting here: https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZXVVlXgg/why-anger-towards-the-unvaccinat/c/
social media and the bots that have ukraine and gay flags and mask emojis and pronouns and all the woke status indicators are finger puppets that cast large shadows that are hoped to be group-consensus fabricators. To get people to assume their conservative, libertarian, pro-child views are a bell-curve outlier and therefore 'problematic'. Shine any torch at these phantoms and I think they will simply go away since they were never here to begin with.
There has to always be 'yet another crisis' in rapid sequence so there is never a chance for recovery and stock-taking from the current one. So that arrests are never done of the instigators of the current crime sets. So that the chaos-chain trying to drag the whole world down to hell does not have any of its links broken and the chain itself compromised. So we must break these links, speak the unpalatable truths, make the forbidden observations, and point out the verboten shadowy figures who lurk holding the strings and carrying out the orchestration. I think Q fits into this niche very snugly.
Yes, your three points aren't really tangential, they are part of this. They are what the cabal does in order to build on their percentage of supporters and prevent people from defecting to their opposition. The mechanisms you mention use fear to keep people in the sector they need them in.
As someone who has always lived on the fringes and been a loner I have always distrusted "public opinion". When I saw what a big part it was playing in current events at first it mystified me but then I understood white hats needing to keep things as peaceful as possible for as long as possible. So I accept that building public opinion on an issue is important (but I'll never like it, just arrest the bad guys already.)
What you didn't add but I think implied with this theory is that the bad guys are just as much, if not even more, invested in keeping things peaceful while they kill us off as the white hats are at keeping us peaceful while we resist. I do believe that the people at the top truly are that cold and calculating that they see the whole of humanity as numbers. So it's good that they didn't get the percentage they were shooting for........... this time. But it's clear that they merely pause then ramp up to do it again, do it 'better' to raise that percentage to where they think they need it to be.
So knowing they will keep doing it to raise their numbers makes it imperative that WE understand how to push back so they never do get their percentage. Their rigorous attempts at censorship in the media and on the internet simply did not work. It was a dreadful failure. Truth leaked out all over the world. Their only remedy for this so far is more Disinformation Boards along with penalties. But that won't work now that so many are awake. This sounds sort of dramatic but we live in strange times, I think that in order for their plan to have any chance of getting to the pareto percentage they know they need they have to either wait for a couple of generations to die off and forget or outright start killing off all but the very young and pliable. Kudos OP, a very interesting way to be looking at all of this.
Oh I really agree with this. The cabal want to inherit a sparsely populated but working infrastructure, not a useless ravaged wasteland. They've thought that aspect through thoroughly and wanted to keep the death rate to the appropriate level to achieve that and to make sure that the population never caught on to the real cause.
IMO they have been rushed. They normally work very slowly, over generations so, yes, they change opinion over generations and inculcate the young.
Thanks fren!
Yes I am seeing it now that these narcissists are unwilling to give up any creature comforts for themselves as they annihilate us. Not only do they want to do it quietly, peacefully but I am realizing that they were planning to NEVER admit to the genocide even happening. What do you mean there are fewer people in this city? You are just crazy to think that.
I have long believed that the strategy central to Trump's war against them was rushing them into doing things before they were ready and then being there to meet them. They have been sloppy, unorganized and incompetent because they didn't get the decades they needed for the all important grooming steps, both for grooming their own puppets and the mass population. The Art of War has worked. They will keep coming at us because the agenda never changes but each time they reveal more of their hand making it less effective not more. What a dilemma for them!
When everyone is locked down in their houses and can't get local information then they can't know whether their neighbour has died or what caused it.
When everyone is locked down, their worldview can come only through the curated MSM.
Combat tactics Mr. Ryan!
This is why they key to winning is a great awakening, it almost seems too passive, but it isn't. Almost all cabal actions are carried out by non awake normies. It is the normies who have the real life skills to implement what the cabal wants and when a threshold percentage of awakened normies will no longer work for them then they lose.
Another point that interests me is the vast difference between our viewpoint and their viewpoint. They actually made their plans hoping to avoid open war and still getting themselves from point A to point B by means of propaganda and various deceptions. They lied to themselves that they could remain anonymous and "safe" while they carried all of this out. Whereas we look at their point A and point B and ONLY see that it would take open war for them to get there. "Open war is upon you whether you would have it or not!" ~ Aragorn.
You mean they didn't think they would trigger a significant reaction but we think they always would? Not sure I agree with the second point.
I always like a LOTR quote because I see the story as such an allegory for the plan.
Just stumbled across this. Not sure how Tolkein's involvement in Signals Intelligence has escaped my notice. https://rumble.com/v15o085-episode-13-the-lord-of-the-rings-and-the-all-seeing-eye..html
Interesting. Thanks.
I can see where that would come into the story.
I am a HUGE LOTRs fan. So much deep goodness in those tales. I see their villians leaning over their tables of toy soldiers planning and scheming how to get to where they want to get without so much as ruffling their own feathers or being late to dinner whereas one of us takes one look at their battlefield and says "that ain't happening!"
Is another way to state this that it's a different type of chess? One where capturing enough pawns must occur before the next step of going after the King or Queen can happen. But, since they've been rushed they've had to be far more open in going after the King than they had planned.
You'd have to ask a chess player that one.
Yeah, I'm not a chess player either let alone 5D chess.
Apologies if I seem to be taking over this thread but I find it intriguing, if I'm annoying just tell me to sit back down and process quietly. I haven't read Gen. Flynn's 5G Warfare but hope to at some point. What I am seeing from this thread is that THE key for both sides in this war is duality of what is public and what remains hidden in the shadows. It becomes a long process of forcing things they wanted to hide out into the sunlight over and over and over. Which is indeed where we digital soldiers have played and will play a very important part. But what is niggling at me this morning is....... for many of us we have inherently accepted that we need to use discretion in our efforts and not 'out' ourselves or at least not too much at any one time. For others this isn't an issue and I get that, but for those of us that it is..... this is my question. Is there a point in this war when we MUST stand and be counted? That we ourselves become the deciding factor by coming out of the shadows? I am not talking about any violence just visibility, which may lead to them being violent against us. I don't even know if I'm making sense here but I am visualizing it as us suddenly all standing and creating such a step, a plateau if you will, that they cannot steamroll over and instead run straight into.
You're talking about anonymity I think
I think this is a very important discussion. I think the weight of distinct anons out there talking about stuff and analysing details in public is making a huge difference. Being an anon means that you are judged on the reputation of your previous comments and the merits of your arguments and non on real world qualifications or reputation. In fact, we normally do not know each other's credentials and surely we have many undeclared experts amongst us for every subject. Doctors, engineers, historians, scientists, teachers. In this environment, there is always an expert to take apart an argument made or bolster it on merit.
When it comes to real life. Who is to say that we anons are not being counted in person. I redpill anyone I can and have a message on my car about the vax. We also have people on twitter and Truth and rumble who are non anonymous, but may also have a presence here - who knows.
I too see this as an important discussion. I know that many, possibly even most of us do what we can as individuals. But what I am questioning I guess is IF there is a step necessary in the Awakening where we put anonymity behind us and just step out en mass when it is time for the tide to turn.
Let me state it differently. A point where us stepping out en masse does in fact turn the tide at the 'precipice'.
I think the precipice is the scare event, not the public response to it, but maybe it's both.
I don't really want there to be a time when we all have to work synchronously like that. I think our power is in our million different approaches. We are a distributed intelligence. Can you tell me why it would be necessary?
I'm not sure it would be but in thinking through your premise it occurred to me that it could be a necessary step to shift the window on their percentage. It becomes "do they really need 90% to move forward?" OR "can they still move forward on the PERCEPTION that they have 90%" ??? We are the difference in those two things.
Yes, this is worth thinking on. Luckily, the perception is brittle and redpilling someone is generally irreversible. When shown something in the right way, people can't unsee it.
That's an EXCELLENT point. You're talking about a major and inherent benefit of FREEDOM: society's problems get tackled from many directions by many different people with different views, expertise, and approaches -- instead of by a single imposed pseudo-solution. Under freedom, what works is embraced and less-successful approaches are discarded. Under tyranny, you're stuck with whatever approach gets imposed, until some other imposed solution comes along -- which is usually just the same corrupt "solution" as before with a new name, a bigger budget, and tighter restrictions.
Also: This has become an epic thread. Thanks for starting it off, propertyofUniverse!
Wow. Thank you very much fren!
It's an analysis approach which has been rattling round in my head for a while.
IMO It's related to phase changes and emergent properties of complex systems
I'm sure the cabal have lots of analysis on how to manipulate societies.
Not at all fren. I like the back and forth and the details.
Here's the general pareto principal
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/paretoprinciple.asp
I think this is exactly right. That's why the vax propaganda became stronger and more pervasive late in 2021, as the public stopped worrying so much about covid.