Flat Earther spends $20,000 on DIY experiment that accidentally proved the planet is ROUND
(www.dailymail.co.uk)
🌏 Sphere World 🌎
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (308)
sorted by:
Apparenly you've never listened to Neil DeGrass Tyson, cabal-endorsed globe spokesman, eh? He's on record for stating Felix Baumgartner didn't see any curvature at 125,000 feet (24 miles) {as the on-board camera showed}.
And if that wasn't enough, they had to wheel Neil back out on the circuit to run even more embarrasing damage control after Richard Branson's Virgin Galactic high-altitude flight which was over 50 miles above the surface and he had to again run thought his stOOpid beachball example and remind everybody that Felix was only like 1mm (millimeter) above the beachball and the Virgin Galactic crew was only 2mm above the beachball and could in no way see any curvature.
And yet you somehow have deceived yourself into believing you saw curvature from a Cessna which couldn't even get to a third of Baumgartner's height, let alone the altitude of Virgin Galactic flight.
And you GLOBALISTS call us flat-earth researchers delusional - when it's CEARLY & UNDENIABLY the other way around!!!
You misspelled "LIES". There's literally none.
You demonstrate you've either never researched flat earth for even a second, or you've fallen for the Google/YouTube algorithm's suggestions. How clumsy of you.
Ever wonder why Google/YouTube deplatforms, censors and de-optimizes all the legitimate flat earth researchers out there (dozens upon dozens)? Yeah, you globalists don't wonder about that, do you?
You haven't read anything I've said in this thread apparently. Firstly, we're not allowed to travel past the 60th parallel. Go give it a try sometime and you'll wind up in an unfriendly prison. Yet another thing you globalists don't wonder about.
Secondly, no flat earther has ever claimed there is an "edge". Only the Google/YouTube(CIA)-sponsored "Flat Earth Society" makes that suggestion. You've done been double-fooled my friend...congrats to you sucka!!! P.T. Barnum was right!
Congratulation for an entire post that's 100% completely wrong and backwards, as usual from the blindly trusting GLOBALIST community.
Maxim of Law -> "He who makes the claim bears the burden of proof". You've tangled yourself up in a "Proof of claim logical fallacy". Once again, classic globalist confusion and delusion. It's your pals the GLOBALIST ESTABLISHMENT that has MADE THE CLAIM that we live on a ball. And yet they can't produce a single scientific experiment to prove it. How odd, no? Shouldn't there be hundreds, even thousands of proofs of the ball they can demonstrate? Yet another question none of you globies ever bother to ponder...
There are literally THOUSANDS of pictures and videos now roundly and soundly demonstrating that we can see way further than the 3954 mile radius claimed by the CABAL ESTABLISHMENT GLOBALISTS should allow. Hundreds of different independent researchers have captured them. The only way to disprove all these pix and vids is to suggest the radius is at least 10x larger that claimed. It's the only way. But if the establishment did this, then they'd have to account for 10x land mass and ocean mass and that's just not going to be possible, now is it?
And how do the totally-in-denial-globalists defend this mountain of evidence? Why they claim and whine like little babies "muh refraction"!!!!! And yet they don't even know what refraction is. I'm embarrassed for them when they say it. It's a pure defense mechanism to their cognitive dissonance and doesn't explain a thing. They've literally got everything backwards, including their ideas about refraction. It's like arguing with a 4-year old about why you won't buy him a candy bar at the checkout aisle. The kid won't accept any explanation you give him no matter what, and instead go into a temper tantrum. This is exactly how the globe-defenders who debate the flat-earthers behave. Every. Single. One. of them, bar one whom I've only just seen recently. I look forward to seeing this guy show up at the debate table again. While I see he's lost in his PhD brainwashing, at least he acts like an adult. The other 50 globe-defenders I've seen act like babies.
Honestly, I'm embarrassed for all you globies at this stage. Three years ago I might have given you a pass. Five years ago I would have let it slide as I was only just coming to terms with flat earth. Seven years ago I would have been right there with you. But in 2023? You've gotta be asleep at the wheel or a pure mainstream leftist not to realize the globe lie man.
There are tens of millions of flat earthers out there now (maybe over a hundred million), growing by the thousands every day. And it's not because they're all a bunch of morons, it's the exact opposite. These people have woken up to all the lies we're immersed in, many of which are regularly exposed on this board. Which is why I find it so hard to believe there so many globies here, knowing at least how many political and medical lies we're immersed in. How can you not recognize that it's possible, even likely that there are lies about the very nature of the reality we live in too? What gives?
I find it astonishing that you're here on GA yet continue to defend the globalists without doing ANY research on flat earth. You're in denial like all the other globies. To not even ask questions demonstrates this. You boldly state NON-FACTS that frankly have been debunked 5+ years ago that aren't even debated any longer by the globe defenders.
I'll say it again, for the 50th time in this thread, and the 1000th time on this board. All the pictures and videos you've seen that you BELIEVE who curvature or a globe are produced by NASA or some other cabal-nation space agency. Every. Single. One. They are all photo-manipulated or video CGI in one way or another. This has been proven over and over again by the FE community. Even NASA employees have admitted that our most recent pictures of the alleged globe were completely photoshopped and are "composite images" that they have to stitch together. Not a single "Picture/Photograph" exists that hasn't been.
Since you BELIEVE you've seen curvature from your Cessna, you should give old Tyson a call and let him know he's out there on national television embarrassing himself. Sigh
To your first claim, it's bullshit, you can see the curvature from much lower, which you would know if you had ever been up in a small aircraft, like, the kind with flat windows you can slide back, or even the kind you can remove the doors. You claimed earlier to have "looked hard for proof" but you didn't think to go up in the air and look? Pretty fishy.
Now, let's look at my claim- The globalists created the Flat Earth conspiracy to make a mockery of all other conspiracies. What would the motive be? To discredit people who are actually on to the truth of something, like the CIA murdering JFK, or that Global Warming is a lie, by comparing them to people who believe something disproven hundreds of years ago. Now, let's entertain your claim- the Globalists have been conspiring for hundreds of years to convince people to believe that our planet is a globe like everything else in the solar system (guess they had an easy job), so they can........ What? Where is the motive?
You're literally contradicting the globalist cabal-endorsed, #1 GLOBE DEFENDER in the world, Neil Degrasse Tyson. Not to mention your own god-given vision. Nobody can see curvature from commercial aircraft. This is a fully established fact that none of the professional globe defenders in the world deny.
The CIA, aka Jesuit, conspiracy started long before any of us were born. You're literally in denial.
The motive is two-fold. First, to make you feel small and insignificant, as just a random, accidental conglomeration of star dust - denial of a creator. And second, to keep you locked into believing you can only travel between the 6 continents that they allow you to move between.
There's not a one of you here on the GA board that has the slightest clue on this subject. The levels of DENIAL are astounding. Not a one of your arguments has even been valid for at least the past 3 years. The globe community has been reduced to "muh gravity", "muh refraction" and "Muh mathematical models" and "muh observations". This is where the debate hinges today.