Because the thermosphere is essentially hard vacuum and there is no heat capacity to speak of. Temperature doesn't mean much if there aren't very many molecules to carry it.
Gotcha. Sounds sciency. So basically its safe and effective. Wait how does the vacuum not suck our air? please say something provable and reproducable like a giant dome that the bible says. I understand a scuba tank or propane tank. If gravity is the preferred theory then never mind.
Just think of gravity as a kind of magnetism that is effective on air. The pressure is a function of the depth of the air. It's no different than water. Without gravity, water would just separate into globules and float around. The Bible says nothing about an enclosing dome. That is a "reading-in" from Medieval ideas derived from ancient Mesopotamia. All the Bible talks about are the heavens. "Firmament" is a translation bias. Other translations use "heaven" or "heavens."
As for provable and reproducible, we have the whole history of flight and rocketry from which we learned these facts. Go higher, the atmosphere is thinner. Eventually, it gets thin enough, we call it vacuum---even though there is still some density.
Here's how vacuum is not stronger than gravity. It is well known in barometry that you cannot, by vacuum, suck up a column of water higher than about 32 feet. That high, and no higher. Air is about a thousand times less dense than water, so that would be 32,000 feet of air---if air were an incompressible liquid. But air is really a compressible gas, so it has more elasticity and stretches up to about 100 kilometers before it is considered to be "space."
Okay, you dont need to call it vacuum if that confuses you. Call it 0 psi.
Imagine a tall cylinder, open top. Do you agree that the pressure in the cylinder will be greater at the bottom of the cylinder than at the top? This is because air has weight, like every other material. Wait though, why doesnt the air get sucked out the top of the container? Considering the air at the top is at a lower psi than the air at the bottom of the container.
You really dont know? Do you have any reason to believe that radiation at a distance would be the same as at the source? This should be a point of common sense. Dont say you have common sense if you think radiation from a point source could be the same at a distance away from the source of the radiation as it is AT the source.
Arent there ways to block radiation?
Obviously 3 layers of aluminum foil with cardboard flaps should do it. Wait what is the temperature of the thermosphere? Why didn’t the tin foil melt?
Because the thermosphere is essentially hard vacuum and there is no heat capacity to speak of. Temperature doesn't mean much if there aren't very many molecules to carry it.
Gotcha. Sounds sciency. So basically its safe and effective. Wait how does the vacuum not suck our air? please say something provable and reproducable like a giant dome that the bible says. I understand a scuba tank or propane tank. If gravity is the preferred theory then never mind.
Just think of gravity as a kind of magnetism that is effective on air. The pressure is a function of the depth of the air. It's no different than water. Without gravity, water would just separate into globules and float around. The Bible says nothing about an enclosing dome. That is a "reading-in" from Medieval ideas derived from ancient Mesopotamia. All the Bible talks about are the heavens. "Firmament" is a translation bias. Other translations use "heaven" or "heavens."
As for provable and reproducible, we have the whole history of flight and rocketry from which we learned these facts. Go higher, the atmosphere is thinner. Eventually, it gets thin enough, we call it vacuum---even though there is still some density.
Here's how vacuum is not stronger than gravity. It is well known in barometry that you cannot, by vacuum, suck up a column of water higher than about 32 feet. That high, and no higher. Air is about a thousand times less dense than water, so that would be 32,000 feet of air---if air were an incompressible liquid. But air is really a compressible gas, so it has more elasticity and stretches up to about 100 kilometers before it is considered to be "space."
Okay, you dont need to call it vacuum if that confuses you. Call it 0 psi. Imagine a tall cylinder, open top. Do you agree that the pressure in the cylinder will be greater at the bottom of the cylinder than at the top? This is because air has weight, like every other material. Wait though, why doesnt the air get sucked out the top of the container? Considering the air at the top is at a lower psi than the air at the bottom of the container.
That’s like saying there is a suit you can wear that will protect you when you step on the sun. That amount of radiation idk
What amount of radiation? Cough up a number, before you make ridiculous comparisons. Ever had an X-ray? Did you burst into flames?
Do you think radiation is what kills you at the sun? Do you think the maybe the radiation would be less at a great distance from the sun?
Idk?
You really dont know? Do you have any reason to believe that radiation at a distance would be the same as at the source? This should be a point of common sense. Dont say you have common sense if you think radiation from a point source could be the same at a distance away from the source of the radiation as it is AT the source.