Update on Plan D: Our brother Loy's Petition made it to the US Supreme Court Docket! #22-1028 Yay!

We bypassed the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals using the Rule 11 (national emergency rule) and the US Supreme Court accepted it. We are now waiting for the Solicitor General to respond.

Update on Plan E: As a result of the Court Order which was issued by my Federal Court Judge to the three Justices (that if they don't respond to my lawsuit against them, they would be removed from office) they lawyered up, complied with the order and filed a motion asking the judge to not let my case go forward on grounds that they are just too important to be sued, that they should be immune to such things, and that (in so many words) are above the Law. Well, this gives us the opportunity to file an opposition to this motion, and oppose it we will! They are submitting to the decision of my judge, which they can appeal all the way up to the US Supreme Court! What do I say about this? Ha ha, bring it on baby!

Thank you for the letters! To my Judge www.enoughisenough.me To Loy's US Supreme Court www.brunsonbrothers.com
We want them to know that this is about We The People, and not just about us! Let them know you are alive! Thank you and God bless you!

Here you go, anons:

https://imgur.com/a/KBDgXr6

Don’t have LifeLog

Ok, so now we have Supremes going to court, how does this work if it hits SCOTUS???

Surely they cannot be allowed to sit on the Supreme Court and hear this case at the same time....

So Precedent will have to be established for things exactly such as this, should it ever happen again....

But what if Congress, or the Senate tries to replace them with other even more libtarded Justices???

I'm going to predict that Congress will try to pull another fast one like they did in Ex Parte McCardle....

This is the Case:::

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/74/506

But, when reading it, you must give special Attention to This part::

"" 6

3. The act conferring the jurisdiction having been repealed, the jurisdiction ceased; and the court had thereafter no authority to pronounce any opinion or render any judgment in this cause. No court can do any act in any case, without jurisdiction of the subject-matter. It can make no difference at what point, in the progress of a cause, the jurisdiction ceases. After it has ceased, no judicial act can be performed. In Insurance Company v. Ritchie,8 the Chief Justice, delivering the opinion of the court, says: 7

'It is clear, that when the jurisdiction of a cause depends upon the statute, the repeal of the statute takes away the jurisdiction.' 8

And in that case the repealing statute, which was passed during the pendency of the cause, was held to deprive the court of all further jurisdiction. The causes which were pending in this court against States, were all dismissed by the amendment of the Constitution denying the jurisdiction; and no further proceedings were had in those causes.9 In Norris v. Crocker,10 this court affirmed and acted upon the same principle; and the exhaustive argument of the present Chief Justice, then at the bar, reported in that case, and the numerous authorities there cited, render any further argument or citation of cases unnecessary.11 ""

The Power of Congress over SCOTUS is what allowed Congress to play games with many Good Solid Cases that might have set much good Precedents for Laws in our Judicial System, but they totally screwed us over, and that was the First time that I know of....

Need a better link if possible. Thank you.

Link doesn't work for those of us who don't have FB. Maybe you could give us a quick summary.

When you move the goal post so many times that you use every letter of the alphabet - is your plan even valid or worth considering?