In the USA yes. Things changed in 1973 in Australia. We had a constitution established in 1901. That was criminally usurped. We now have a corporation.
Australia's constitution was drafted by looking at the constitutions of the US, Switzerland and (?), and the best aspects adopted.
Australia's constitution was a massive watershed, inasmuch as the UK Parliament, for the first and only time in its history, handed their power directly over the the people (of Australia).
Australia's constitution empowers the People and is designed to only function properly when the People take up their correct role as the owners of the Nation.
The "Crown" is in fact the body of common law inherited down through British history. The Monarchy 'represents' the Crown, but the Monarchy are rightfully subject to the Law, aka the Crown.
I thought it was stolen in 1913 with the formation of central banking here?
In the USA yes. Things changed in 1973 in Australia. We had a constitution established in 1901. That was criminally usurped. We now have a corporation.
Indeedio.
Unidroit treaty + Royal Styles and Titles act.
Little did I know (in the past):
Australia's constitution was drafted by looking at the constitutions of the US, Switzerland and (?), and the best aspects adopted.
Australia's constitution was a massive watershed, inasmuch as the UK Parliament, for the first and only time in its history, handed their power directly over the the people (of Australia).
Australia's constitution empowers the People and is designed to only function properly when the People take up their correct role as the owners of the Nation.
The "Crown" is in fact the body of common law inherited down through British history. The Monarchy 'represents' the Crown, but the Monarchy are rightfully subject to the Law, aka the Crown.
Succinctly put FI. Thank you for stating it so well.
Oops, didn’t catch you were referring to Australia. My bad.