Anger with Russia? What about anger with the culprits of the terror attack on some major infrastructure, just to piss off Russia, and keep Germany down? The fact that it happened months ago does not change that.
If Trump had done it, it would be considered worse than Pearl Harbor and 9/11 and WWI and WWII and the Holocaust. No other news would have appeared on the front pages of the New York Times and the Washington Post for months and months.
With the WaPo, a known outlet of the Mockingbird CIA media, you always have to ask yourself, "Why this topic?...Why this point of view? ...and Why now" What we are seeing here is not necessarily the "news" but rather what the Derp State WANTS us to think. So why?
I can discern several misdirections in that brief excerpt above, such as "would rather not have to deal with the possibility that Ukraine or allies were involved." Really? Suggesting that Ukraine was involved (unlikely due to technical challenges) puts suspicion away from the true culprit.
"The attack happened months ago...." Suggesting that it's old news, can't we just move on?
And so on. Never trust the WaPo to get it right, it's ALWAYS misdirection and part of a psy-op against us.
Anger with Russia? What about anger with the culprits of the terror attack on some major infrastructure, just to piss off Russia, and keep Germany down? The fact that it happened months ago does not change that.
Methinks there is some doubling down going on.
Also, we seek truth not because we want to be comfortable. We seek truth so that we can have accountability.
If some answers make you uncomfortable, maybe you know who did it and are involved in covering it up.
If Trump had done it, it would be considered worse than Pearl Harbor and 9/11 and WWI and WWII and the Holocaust. No other news would have appeared on the front pages of the New York Times and the Washington Post for months and months.
they would have impeached him (again) for it.
No doubt.
With the WaPo, a known outlet of the Mockingbird CIA media, you always have to ask yourself, "Why this topic?...Why this point of view? ...and Why now" What we are seeing here is not necessarily the "news" but rather what the Derp State WANTS us to think. So why?
I can discern several misdirections in that brief excerpt above, such as "would rather not have to deal with the possibility that Ukraine or allies were involved." Really? Suggesting that Ukraine was involved (unlikely due to technical challenges) puts suspicion away from the true culprit.
"The attack happened months ago...." Suggesting that it's old news, can't we just move on?
And so on. Never trust the WaPo to get it right, it's ALWAYS misdirection and part of a psy-op against us.
https://archive.is/MLLgH
https://archive.is/ZkTz1