A "right to privacy" is not in the constitution. The cabal only gets away with what they can because they do it in the shadows. In the old days you had a party line on your telephone and your local mailman could see what was coming and going from your house. The internet is a public space. If someone walked into the library or the grocery story fully suited up and covered, we would know that person was up to something really fishy, yet we're fine with basically the same thing on the internet.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated"
Our privacy is explicitly protected in the Constitution in all ways against searches and seizure; the governments collecting this data combined with our IP address is both of those things.
The only thing it doesn't protect is by those deemed "unreasonable", such as when you actually commit a crime.
And if you think VPNs make your data completely unavailable to governments, you have absolutely no reason to even enter the conversation to begin with as it's just another layer of security; almost every public facing VPN complies with governments.
Additionally, your "mail man" is a funny and actually retarded thing to conflate as this concerns usage within your own home, which is distinctly inviolable by the mail man. They can only deliver mail, they can't take it or spread or compile that information.
Why you want to make it easier for governments I don't know, but I can unreservedly say that you are either mentally handicapped or totally naive as to the power that grants them -- power not given to them by the Constitution.
The dystopian path that leads us down gives a tyrannical government exactly what they want: More freedom to Big Brother its citizens.
The internet is not in your personal house, it's a public space. Your car can be stopped and searched if there is a suspicion of wrong doing. People can record what you're doing when you're in a public space.
Giving the government power is fine as long as it's the white hats who are in control.
Giving the government power is fine as long as it's the white hats who are in control.
Oh boy.... This is the slogan of every single wanna-be or real dictator who ever came to power. Every single one. Not one single megalomaniac serial murdering dictator ever came to power saying "give me the power because I'm going to use it to kill you all". It's was ALWAYS "give me the power, because I'm a white hat".
Every single time.
Fren, you are exceedingly naive.
If you want to take the internet analogy seriously, you have to understand this: There are places on in the internet that restrict who can enter and use them. They are called private websites. Subscription websites (eg. news organizations), business websites, public govt websites, etc.
Your car can be stopped and searched if there is a suspicion of wrong doing.
No, that's not true. It most jurisdictions, it will have to be "reasonable suspicion". And until that reasonable suspicion exists, the police or authorities have NO RIGHT to search, query or question you.
People can record what you're doing when you're in a public space.
But people are also liable for what they do to you in a public space. A person who can record a minor, for example, using their phone, and then post that footage, etc on the internet is liable for the results. They do NOT have the right to walk up to that child, to demand information on who the child is, what they are doing, etc. And, if they take footage without permission, they become liable for the results.
Fren, you really have no idea what is going on. You need to rethink through this.
Lol no. VPNs are important.
You don't know how many people are behind VPNs for good reason, doing actual work and investigation for this stuff.
We have a right to privacy, period.
A "right to privacy" is not in the constitution. The cabal only gets away with what they can because they do it in the shadows. In the old days you had a party line on your telephone and your local mailman could see what was coming and going from your house. The internet is a public space. If someone walked into the library or the grocery story fully suited up and covered, we would know that person was up to something really fishy, yet we're fine with basically the same thing on the internet.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated"
Our privacy is explicitly protected in the Constitution in all ways against searches and seizure; the governments collecting this data combined with our IP address is both of those things.
The only thing it doesn't protect is by those deemed "unreasonable", such as when you actually commit a crime.
And if you think VPNs make your data completely unavailable to governments, you have absolutely no reason to even enter the conversation to begin with as it's just another layer of security; almost every public facing VPN complies with governments.
Additionally, your "mail man" is a funny and actually retarded thing to conflate as this concerns usage within your own home, which is distinctly inviolable by the mail man. They can only deliver mail, they can't take it or spread or compile that information.
Why you want to make it easier for governments I don't know, but I can unreservedly say that you are either mentally handicapped or totally naive as to the power that grants them -- power not given to them by the Constitution.
The dystopian path that leads us down gives a tyrannical government exactly what they want: More freedom to Big Brother its citizens.
The internet is not in your personal house, it's a public space. Your car can be stopped and searched if there is a suspicion of wrong doing. People can record what you're doing when you're in a public space.
Giving the government power is fine as long as it's the white hats who are in control.
Oh boy.... This is the slogan of every single wanna-be or real dictator who ever came to power. Every single one. Not one single megalomaniac serial murdering dictator ever came to power saying "give me the power because I'm going to use it to kill you all". It's was ALWAYS "give me the power, because I'm a white hat".
Every single time.
Fren, you are exceedingly naive.
If you want to take the internet analogy seriously, you have to understand this: There are places on in the internet that restrict who can enter and use them. They are called private websites. Subscription websites (eg. news organizations), business websites, public govt websites, etc.
No, that's not true. It most jurisdictions, it will have to be "reasonable suspicion". And until that reasonable suspicion exists, the police or authorities have NO RIGHT to search, query or question you.
But people are also liable for what they do to you in a public space. A person who can record a minor, for example, using their phone, and then post that footage, etc on the internet is liable for the results. They do NOT have the right to walk up to that child, to demand information on who the child is, what they are doing, etc. And, if they take footage without permission, they become liable for the results.
Fren, you really have no idea what is going on. You need to rethink through this.