Porn is porn. We heard this argument during the obscenity trials during the 80s. Things have become horrible. I’m not a prude. But there’s room much porn on the internet for kids to access. It’s beyond imagination right now.
Edit: these companies are clearly engaged in trafficking and targeting minors.
Most Hotspots and ISPs offer content filtering/blocking options explicitly for parents concerned about what their kids view online. Including options that will even text/email if the kid try’s to open a restricted site. They’ve actually offered it for quite a few years.
I uh. May have learned that the hard way in my youth.
Let's be clear. There is a HUGE difference between curious kids searching out porn on the internet, and teachers shoving transgenderism and age inappropriate content down impressionable children's throat. Which one is honestly more dangerous to the psyche of our children?
The privacy issues associated with this kind of action make it questionable at best, and it is easily defeated by kids who are already going out of their way to find it. Moreover, parents have non controversial ways to restrict access to this kind of content.
This legislation strikes me as a way to shift the discussion of the real problem to a strawman that they know we don't want.
Porn is porn. We heard this argument during the obscenity trials during the 80s. Things have become horrible. I’m not a prude. But there’s room much porn on the internet for kids to access. It’s beyond imagination right now.
Edit: these companies are clearly engaged in trafficking and targeting minors.
Most Hotspots and ISPs offer content filtering/blocking options explicitly for parents concerned about what their kids view online. Including options that will even text/email if the kid try’s to open a restricted site. They’ve actually offered it for quite a few years.
I uh. May have learned that the hard way in my youth.
Don’t have kids. Talking about myself 🤣.
No seriously. I totally agree with the slippery slope issue.
Create service like notary public then
Let's be clear. There is a HUGE difference between curious kids searching out porn on the internet, and teachers shoving transgenderism and age inappropriate content down impressionable children's throat. Which one is honestly more dangerous to the psyche of our children?
The privacy issues associated with this kind of action make it questionable at best, and it is easily defeated by kids who are already going out of their way to find it. Moreover, parents have non controversial ways to restrict access to this kind of content.
This legislation strikes me as a way to shift the discussion of the real problem to a strawman that they know we don't want.
Multiple threads on this already, with idiots clamoring for more controls but YEAH definitely not a huge distraction and it’s just SYMBOLIC.
When will you learn, for real, when are you people going to learn that freedom comes with a downside?
Really?
I grew up conservative Christian to the 10th degree, it was all about control.
Which means I got good at hiding shit.
people can still vpn if they are really desperate or use other hundreds of different sites to be honest