Moon landing doubts
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
u/#q2225
Moon landings are reel 🧐
just because some of the footage was faked, doesn't mean the real event didn't occur.
WHY that footage was faked, and why we've never been back, are the interesting questions.
I casually get into the theory that Kubrick faked the landings. Rob Ager / Collative Learning on YouTube has a lot of deep Kubrick videos that are fun to watch, although he intentionally stays clear of the fake landing theories. Nonetheless, he’s got some great videos that talk about how 2001 was propaganda to get Americans used to the idea of going to space. It’s not a stretch to say 2001 was a companion piece to the fake landing.
Good documentary on it called Room 237. And I just found out Kubrick wanted Eyes Wide Shut, per contract, to be released on the 30th anniversary of the apollo 11 moon launch.
'Doesn't say US or Apollo moon landings. Might it mean OTHER things at other times (even by other countries, beings or civilizations)?
movie reel
Q said disinfo is necessary, too 🤷♂️
ONLY THE REAL MESSIAH WOULD DENY THAT HE IS THE MESSIAH
We did need to plant a reflector on the moon.
There is already one, apparently (at least as per Big Bang Theory TV show lol)
There is a moon landing. But notice that Q didn't say humans landed on the moon.
Yes, there's a lot of wiggle room in the Q response. Perhaps NASA didn't fake the footage, but the CIA did. Is that enough to earn a "false"?
The question "the moon landings" covered humans landing on moon, so I would assume Q used the word "landings" in the same way.
Q said moon “landings” are real. When people use the singular “landing” it usually refers to the much-publicized one in 1969. If Q said the moon landing (singular) is real, we’d figure he was talking about the 1969 one. But that’s not what Q said. Q’s comment could be seen as supporting the theory that the 1969 one was faked but the following ones in the 1970s were real.
I reason I posted that Q post is that, Q did pretty much imply that the "1969 landing" we have all been told publicly was not real, even though they did land on Moon, but with some secret technology. It would even suggest that all publicly acknowledged landings are fake since it specifically mentions "outside public domain"
'Doesn't say US or Apollo moon landings. Might it mean OTHER things at other times (even by other countries, beings or civilizations)?
Yes, it’s very open to interpretation