what he said about not designating Putin a war criminal is so apt and insightful. These liberals dont think things through and is a perfect example of them being led by emotions, rather than logical forward thinking that would best end the war peacefully by giving Putin a way out.
If he knows he's gonna be executed for war crimes if he's caught he has no reason not to fight to the death, and then you enter endgame Nuclear territory...
It was such a Sean Hannity move on her part. Anybody else remember during the Iraq war when he kept asking Democrats "Do you want America to win the war in Iraq or not?" Nobody ever knew how to answer that question. If they ever tried to shift the question he'd bully them "Yes or no???" It was a total dick move that embarrassingly, I kind of liked at the time, but that was because I was still playing the left vs. right game and didn't know the true nature of how things worked and I liked seeing anti-war Democrats (who I now agree with on that topic) scramble.
But if they had just said "Define 'win.'" Then it would have been Hannity scrambling. It's a good move. People should utilize it more.
Very well said here. I also used to play the DvsR game myself. I’m noticing a trend again tho…as you said “our side”. I heard Swallowswell mention the same thing the other day in a hearing, meeting or whatever they were in. It’s basically the same thing, or is it? When I say our side I’m referring to white hats. I think maybe your meaning something similar. When “Farts”well said it…was he referring to Dems or something else? I wonder. But the “our side” thing is heating up. I just find that interesting.
But anyway I’m rambling. Your post is a good one tho. 👍
what he said about not designating Putin a war criminal is so apt and insightful. These liberals dont think things through and is a perfect example of them being led by emotions, rather than logical forward thinking that would best end the war peacefully by giving Putin a way out.
If he knows he's gonna be executed for war crimes if he's caught he has no reason not to fight to the death, and then you enter endgame Nuclear territory...
It was such a Sean Hannity move on her part. Anybody else remember during the Iraq war when he kept asking Democrats "Do you want America to win the war in Iraq or not?" Nobody ever knew how to answer that question. If they ever tried to shift the question he'd bully them "Yes or no???" It was a total dick move that embarrassingly, I kind of liked at the time, but that was because I was still playing the left vs. right game and didn't know the true nature of how things worked and I liked seeing anti-war Democrats (who I now agree with on that topic) scramble.
But if they had just said "Define 'win.'" Then it would have been Hannity scrambling. It's a good move. People should utilize it more.
Very well said here. I also used to play the DvsR game myself. I’m noticing a trend again tho…as you said “our side”. I heard Swallowswell mention the same thing the other day in a hearing, meeting or whatever they were in. It’s basically the same thing, or is it? When I say our side I’m referring to white hats. I think maybe your meaning something similar. When “Farts”well said it…was he referring to Dems or something else? I wonder. But the “our side” thing is heating up. I just find that interesting. But anyway I’m rambling. Your post is a good one tho. 👍