Azov...Azoth? Is this the Ideology behind the infamous Battalion?
(media.greatawakening.win)
Cabal History
Comments (30)
sorted by:
By now, many of us are familiar with the Azov Battalion's use of Nazi Occult symbolism. Could this be the root of their internal ideology?
The top left text is from "The secret teachings of all ages" by Manly P Hall
https://archive.org/details/pdfy-NXrCfPe_e-QETRFj/page/n462/mode/1up?q=Azoth
Bottom left is an illustration is Paracelus and Azoth, His magical sword. Picture of Rosicrucian origins.
https://www.ancientpages.com/2020/12/24/why-was-the-magical-sword-azoth-of-paracelsus-so-special/
Top right is a mosonic symbol representing the Azoth.
Bottom right is a descriptive text of this symbol from Albert Pike's Morals and Dogma page 850.
https://archive.org/details/MoralsAndDogmaAlbertPikeTheCouncil1871/page/n1229/mode/1up?q=Azoth
Sword symbolizism in the Thule Society maybe this legend. Sorry I didnt include this in the collage.
Clutching at straws. The Azov Battalion was named after the Sea of Azov, as their headquarters had been in the city of Melitopol, on its shore. The Sea of Azov was named for entirely different things. No alchemical significance.
Hello again. Maybe the Sea was named by the people who lived and practiced this religion.
Well Thank you for saying so, I very much appreciate that. And yes we have had some back and forth in regards to another topic. It was another riviting conversation I'll tell you but who knows maybe I made a fan🤷🏻♂️
Not a chance. Read the Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_of_Azov "The name is likely to derive from the settlement of an area around Azov, whose name comes from the Kipchak Turkish asak or azaq 'lowlands'." Do some research before taking the occult plunge.
I guess you cleared it up very well using Wikipedia. Thats a wrap Gentlemen, time to pack it in.
Do you have a better source? No reason to shrug this off; no indication of biased polemic.
There is no "most likely" about correct or wrong. This is what there is...and it has nothing to do with alchemy or the occult. "Azoth" shows up in the sixteenth century, and "Azov" shows up in the 11th century. Gee...it must be a pain in the spleen for your favorite fantasy connection to be a complete bust.
Just because you want it to be so, doesn't mean that it is actually so. You gotta break yourself of that addiction.
You do know that what appears in Wikipedia is the only last edit, by random people, of an entry...right? Always best to check another source or 3 instead of depending solely on what you read on wiki. Wikipedia is about as far lefty/liberal as you can find.
Him and I have a history of this behavior stemming from another post. And the DC Swamp is a lowland, but maybe thats a stretch too.
Likely is the strategic word here. What makes the WIKI referenced likely claim more logical and probable than say: AZOV -> AZOTH? Bias?
I do agree with the notion that more inquiry should be done.
"Likely" implies experience of closely similar cases. Not applicable here. The presumption of innocence (truthfulness or accuracy) applies. You are just using "likely" as a magic word to cover over sheer fancy. But I don't get the impression that you bothered to read the Wiki entry, because you don't acknowledge the various name origins they reviewed. There is NO linguistic path to "azoth" which is only a chemical, and a mythical chemical at that, which reference appears 500 years after "azov."
"There is NO linguistic path to "azoth"" which remains am opinion. perhaps it could be argued an opinion based on a framework that usually works, yet, language is way more flexible.
I am not saying it IS ... it simply refer to the finding of being likely. It is not a magic word. It is a simple observation of fact.
Could be falls short of an IS statement.
Etymology is a problematic field of inquiry. De opinions of these people differ, and changes over time.
The etymological influence of esoteric groups, in the same vein as the development of local language bible translations, or other religious movements have an influence on language is easily underestimated. And that region has seen its share more than others.
To use a wiki page as authoritative is even to my 12 year old son something more than a tall order, and he did not even needed me to come to that conclusion.
So, no, despite your baseless ad hominem, I am not taking sides in this issue other than stating that I see enough room to leave the possibility.
Anything to give hope to a delusion, I guess. I don't think you were meant for this page. It is supposed to be about hard-headed pursuit of truth.
No language is a time machine. You have a 500-year hill to climb.
Interesting. Then perhaps it is wise to apply your own counsel and consider what you wrote.
You don't think. Really? How did that sentence appear in your text?
What you are in fact trying to convey is you think this page is not.for me. It.seems.to me.it is you who still has to climb the second grade writing skill hill.
So, now.we.have.jested at each other's expense, there is one issue I am inclined to address: you, my fren, have no authority. So, say and think as you like, I do not.give a rat's ass about.your opinion if all you all have is forceful derogatories.
Great speculation
Thank you, I thought so especially when Pike specifically mentions the Aryans in paragraph 3.