Sent this through Chat GPT.

• The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit's order denying the motion to intervene is canceled.
• The case is sent back to the court with instructions to dismiss the motion as irrelevant.
• Justice Jackson disagrees with canceling the order and suggests dismissing the writ of certiorari instead.
• The case involves the "Title 42 orders" that restricted immigration due to COVID-19.
• Some states argued that ending the orders violated the Administrative Procedure Act.
• The District Court in Louisiana ruled in favor of the states and issued a nationwide injunction.
• In Washington, D.C., asylum seekers filed a lawsuit arguing that the government lacked legal authority for the orders.
• The D.C. district court agreed with the asylum seekers and vacated the Title 42 orders.
• Some states from the Louisiana case tried to intervene in the D.C. case but were denied.
• The states requested expedited review and a stay, which was granted by the Court.
• Congress and the President declared the end of the COVID-19 emergency, leading the Court to consider the case moot.
• Justice Gorsuch criticizes the handling of the case and the broader intrusions on civil liberties during the pandemic.
• He emphasizes the importance of the legislative process and the dangers of concentrated power.
• He suggests reexamining emergency executive powers and calls for safeguards to protect democracy and civil liberties.

I would, Fren, but it is too powerful. One of the best reads I’ve found in a long time. Trust me, you want to read his words for yourself. And, it’s more like 5.5 pages, because the citations of previous court cases. Additionally, they don’t use full page margins, so it is really more like 4.5 pages. A worthwhile read. Enjoy.

It isn't a legal opinion, it's a summary of how America and the world was screwed by panic. The opinion is that we shouldn't have done that and we should take steps to prevent such abuse.

The text without footnotes has approximately 1,675 words which would take an average reader 6½ minutes to read ... and it's more like a newspaper opinion editorial than a legal text 🤓

This is the issue. Degradation by willful intent.