A lil 9/11 truth for ya
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (69)
sorted by:
idk, perhaps it's not 100% accurate, still thought it was good enough to cause further digs by unawake people
Hologram theory? I lean more towards Field McConnell's BUAP theory, where the planes were remotely flown into the buildings with all aboard already dead from gas piped through the AC system, and bombs placed by the E Team Israeli Art Students taking the towers down. Open to being corrected though, not a hard liner on it
alright, shit. Just watched this Ace Baker video someone posted https://www.bitchute.com/video/2ynY9D0sfusP/ I am really doubting my opinion on the planes. Seeing that looped clip of the plane going in and out of the building makes no sense at all
Yea I think the planes disintegrated in the clouds of smoke and the debris was swept away with the buildings and sent to china asap. But what about the people on the ground seeing planes in real time, their reactions to the second plane on home video
The remote takeover of the aircraft is very plausible, and in my opinion it's why the smoking gun which is building 7 still had to fall, after flight 93 remote takeover went wrong.
Again, IMO flight 93 was intended to hit building 7 to complete the perceived collapse and cover the loss of the data that was housed there, as it was in the 3 other buildings that were bought down.
When flight 93 remote hijacking went wrong, they still had to destroy building 7 and turn it into the key fact that undermines the whole official narrative. The University of Alaska study into the collapse of building 7 fairly recently released shows categorically that the official NIST narrative about the collapse is full of shit.
The trouble is most people have never heard of the fall of building 7, nor what was housed there!
The problem with what you're saying is that you're assuming there was any concrete at the point of impact. If the concrete and steel was removed prior to the plane's impact, it would fly right into the building.
We do see planes fly into the building. However the only part of the wall that was visible from the videos was the outermost aluminum layer. We don't know if the concrete and steel layers were still in place. Since the planes did fly into the building for the most part, it is safe to assume the concrete and steel layers were no longer there. That's certainly more likely than super advanced hologram technology instead of planes that fooled everyone who saw it in person and all the different kinds of video cameras that recorded them.
If you also study the videos closely at certain angles, you'll also see it looks like some internal explosion went off moments prior to both planes hitting. Perhaps that's when the concrete and steel layer of the wall was blown inward, and the plane impact covered it up. All that's required was preset charges ready to go at the right place at the right time, which they used on the entire building.
What CGI glitches? Are you referring to compression artifacts?