Holy shit is this real? Is this related to Kari Lake's case or does it fall outside of that? I thought the secretary of state had final say over all that stuff. What am I missing?
Just federal elections meaning the presidential election. Kari Lake is a local state election.
Wow they're different spheres this would have a significant impact on local elections. For example if Trump and Republicans when in a massive landslide in Arizona after this then the optics on a disproportionate state election will be greatly turned in our favor.
The optics, at least in the mainstream, will be "Wow those cheating Republicans stopped using voting machines to stuff the ballot box for Trump!". That's less than ideal. Luckily for us, normies don't seem to care about elections and whether they're fair or not
Isn't that the point? They already have the power so they don't need hobbs. They tried legislation and she vetoed which was important to show who she is. Now they moved on without her.
I don’t think so. Idk how they’d have the power, if it’s not law and therefore not enforceable. But I’m just keeping all components in mind before downing the hopium.
Holy shit is this real? Is this related to Kari Lake's case or does it fall outside of that? I thought the secretary of state had final say over all that stuff. What am I missing?
Just federal elections meaning the presidential election. Kari Lake is a local state election.
Wow they're different spheres this would have a significant impact on local elections. For example if Trump and Republicans when in a massive landslide in Arizona after this then the optics on a disproportionate state election will be greatly turned in our favor.
The optics, at least in the mainstream, will be "Wow those cheating Republicans stopped using voting machines to stuff the ballot box for Trump!". That's less than ideal. Luckily for us, normies don't seem to care about elections and whether they're fair or not
So far it’s still a resolution that both chambers have passed but the governor, Hobbs, has yet to sign it into law (which she probably isn’t).
Isn't that the point? They already have the power so they don't need hobbs. They tried legislation and she vetoed which was important to show who she is. Now they moved on without her.
I don’t think so. Idk how they’d have the power, if it’s not law and therefore not enforceable. But I’m just keeping all components in mind before downing the hopium.