I've been noticing that this here forum/home of ours has been getting increasingly more focused on "typical" conspiracy theory fare. I can get down with a lot of it tbh, I've been digging into most of the various topics I see now for years...BUT...for normies coming here, we HAVE to stick to as much factual information as possible.
Think about how all these posts about Biden being a clone or actor look to normies...or even some of Pentagon videos...
The post about Paul Walker and the Clinton Foundation with no sauce and just a low res snippet of an article...somewhere...
The reason the Anon community and Q has kept up momentum and has made such an impact is because it's been grounded in evidence. Typically evidence that comes out of mainstream news sources that normies read. We just connect some dots that normies are brainwashed out of.
Q hasn't posted in a long time. Many Anons are tired of the battles/war. We were warned this would be the case, so let's refocus. r/conspiracy became a wasteland of crap over time but it was allowed to exist for a reason. It was mostly junk and no one cared about what was posted because it was so outlandish that normies never bought into any of it.
Let's at least not sticky posts like the one claiming Biden is an actor when the images are clearly explained with the simplest explanation...plastic surgery. (All due respect to OP on that one)
This is an information war and there are likely dozens of groups who want this board shut down or delegitimized. What's the easiest way to do that?
Make us all look like nutjobs and flood the board with posts that mimic conspiracy boards of old.
Heads on a swivel Anons.
Before anyone makes it to "Q," they will have almost certainly gone through a fair bit of "conspiracy theory" stuff. Very little of the bigger controversial information will likely be new to a "normie" that has made it this far. What sets apart a good board from a bad one is not the topics, but the debate.
Talking about even something as "out there" as "Flat Earth" is good because of the evidence that is presented and the debate that occurs. If the debate is sufficiently well thought out it can give everyone something to think about (hopefully). I mean, Q addressed FE, moon landing, aliens, puppets, actors, etc.. Suggesting we shouldn't debate evidence on those topics would be ludicrous.
While I'm sure many, even here, think they know the truth, I suggest no one really knows what the whole truth is about anything. What we can do is present evidence and bring the Gestalt of Many Minds to apply to it through the process of debate. Encouraging such debate is essential. Attempting to cater to the hypothetical "normie" by not presenting the evidence at all, thus stifling debate on it won't help anyone, new or old member, get closer to understanding the truth.
I agree.
Is this a site dedicated to uncovering the truth or is now a site to introduce normies to the truth?
Seems like the latter. Feels like a bit over-policing lately.
Incorrect, frog. Q laid these topics to rest for a reason. As per sidebar (as well as long-established modding policies), these topics will be removed, and frogs that cannot keep to this policy will eventually find themselves on the sidelines. Frogs are more than welcome to have opinions about and discuss these topics on other WINs.
Q did NOT lay those topics to rest. Wow, that's not even close to what happened. Let's take a look:
This says nothing about the films of the moon landing. It says nothing about what they found there. It says nothing about the programs that exist outside the public domain, only that they exist. In fact this encourages discussion on these topics. Silencing them then, goes directly against the apparent designs of Q's intent.
We are not alone. Should we not then discuss this topic? Should we ignore evidence on this topic? Has this "put to rest" ANYTHING on this topic?
Maybe we should talk about it. Maybe silencing it is the worst thing you can do according to Q.
OK, maybe this one is "put to rest," BUT there is some very interesting ideas that come out of some of these discussions that encourage further exploration of Q and/or the other topics that come up. These things help other's see the evidence. It shows the debate that we have, it shows the evidence. It helps people see the truth. Silencing does nothing but clear up a post or two every once in a while. while shutting down others getting the information they need.
As for puppets, or actors, I don't think I need to go there, since I doubt you meant we shouldn't talk about those.
Again, conspiracies.WIN.
If Q (or GEOTUS, or *current * somehow in some way move the Overton Window to that topic, it will be all hands on deck. Till then, it will be on conspiracies.WIN.
Does this discussion 1) say anything not currently being discussed, at length, on conspiracies.WIN, and 2) does it move us closer to The Storm? If not, no, then it belongs elsewhere.
Note: GAW is a current events site. If it's not topical, then it belongs elsewhere.
Again, Q wanted us to talk about this stuff.
Q talked about it before. Shutting down the conversation on stuff that Q gave us to talk about goes directly against Q. This is not a Q board if we are not supposed to talk about Q stuff. It is instead a "what catsfive believes" board. Not the best look to be an information tyrant when professing to be against the information tyranny that got us here.
From the sidebar:
If Q talked about it, and left the door open, it's hardly "fringe" now is it?
So not exactly a "current events site" now is it, because it is also a "topics Q has raised" site.
The above sideboard quote does not say "keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current that catsfive approves of." The "catsfive approval" part is not on there.
Q raised these topics. Q encouraged these topics with his address. You shutting it down has NOTHING to do with GAW or its stated rules. It has to do with what catsfive wants, and nothing more.
You are the one not following the rules based purely on what you personally think "people should be talking about." Guiding the conversation of a group according to your designs sounds a whole lot like some other people who most would consider "bad actors."