Rarely do we see a good Q discussion on /pol/ these days. This one is fantastic.
(archive.is)
Q-analysis!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
Honestly, the more the OP in that thread talks, the less credible he becomes. He's been arguing with an obvious shill (with a Finnish flag, a country that recently joined NATO) for the last hour or so, and used terms like 'Q boomer'.
Thank you for sorting through the crap for us. And bringing the golden nuggets. You can’t imagine what an awesome service you are providing.
I had to visit for shits and gits, same as always, slow motion train wreck
I've often thought this board could use a stickied thread where it's a no snowflake, no echo chamber zone where people don't have to prove membership by saying the chants, but aren't called a doomer for stress testing theories and arguments. Much like what's going on in the chan thread in question here. To snowflakes it looks like shills. To educated people it looks like a discussion. Btw, I haven't even looked at it but by the reactions in this thread I can tell I like it because I like anything where someone can steel man the opposing argument.
I'm well aware of the nature of 4chan, thank you.
Can I be a "Q Boomer"? Cuz that sounds pretty cool!
We could get some sew-on patches made for our leather bomber jackets.
I want a patch too!
I need a new leather jacket
...with patches...
Q/4/Boomer
My country is in NATO does that mean i support it?
Can't argue against his timeline of events though! Thread is epic