Are you referring to the planes as being cgi? From the evidence I've seen about it (if you can call it evidence), I don't know what to think. The errors in the official video demonstrate that cgi was used and was flawed. The witnesses on the ground were cia plants (I recall that from years ago). Sorry I have no sauce... I just know what I've seen and what I remember from the research I did. The fact that they never found any significant parts of the planes is another thing... except for an engine on the ground a few blocks of way, not really smashed up from landing and bouncing on pavement... but instead pretty intact... and, from a different model plane than is reported that was hijacked and flown into the building. Too many questions. Too many oddities. So, yeah, I'm leaning towards a total psyop, and the buildings were simply wired for demolition and the cgi planes created the narrative.
I have zero respect for anyone believing the CGI theory, yet claiming to have done research. Here are 18 different views of Flight 175 hitting the South Tower. All were available within hours of the attacks.
Debunk them. Prove each one of them is CGI. You cant. You won't.
I am not convinced either way. Your video is good. But I think the cia could have done every single one of your videos... as well as the ones I posted. I am going to go with what I think is more realistic... the cia created all of it.
Are you referring to the planes as being cgi? From the evidence I've seen about it (if you can call it evidence), I don't know what to think. The errors in the official video demonstrate that cgi was used and was flawed. The witnesses on the ground were cia plants (I recall that from years ago). Sorry I have no sauce... I just know what I've seen and what I remember from the research I did. The fact that they never found any significant parts of the planes is another thing... except for an engine on the ground a few blocks of way, not really smashed up from landing and bouncing on pavement... but instead pretty intact... and, from a different model plane than is reported that was hijacked and flown into the building. Too many questions. Too many oddities. So, yeah, I'm leaning towards a total psyop, and the buildings were simply wired for demolition and the cgi planes created the narrative.
I have zero respect for anyone believing the CGI theory, yet claiming to have done research. Here are 18 different views of Flight 175 hitting the South Tower. All were available within hours of the attacks.
Debunk them. Prove each one of them is CGI. You cant. You won't.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YLm3pkAiJQ&pp=ygUWNTAgdmlld3Mgb2YgZmxpZ2h0IDE3NQ%3D%3D
well, there's this...
https://www.reddit.com/link/m5oxmb/video/l2cumweq08n61/player
I am not convinced either way. Your video is good. But I think the cia could have done every single one of your videos... as well as the ones I posted. I am going to go with what I think is more realistic... the cia created all of it.
Total horse shit.... those videos were deliberately chosen because the approach of the plane was obscured by the building, itself, or cropped.
I knew you would balk on my challenge.
You win! Hooray
How old are you?