I got blasted on that theory too - lost a very close friend when I spoke of CGI.
I'll just say that, to me, it's not so much THAT a plane hit - I think it did, too.. but my research adds explosives. The plane wouldn't have done THAT much damage, plus, the plane would have been destroyed by the steel girders on the outside of the buildings.
I don't worry so much about the "means to the end" - it's WHO, WHAT, and WHY that cuts me to the heart. So, eh, whatever distractions are attempted, proven, guess-work - those are HOWs - I want the "W"s and I want them ALL.
The buildings were taken down in a controlled demolition, correct.
What process occurs in the months before ANY and EVERY controlled demolition?
A WEAKENING OF THE STRUCTURE
There is your answer. The entry points of both towers were compromised prior to the attacks.
Want to know the who? >> DOV ZAKHEIM << Central Figure in 9/11 Plot // Zakheim the Pentagon Comptroller, looking for Rumsfeld's missing $2.3 Trillion AAAND he had a contract with the US Air Force to retrofit 36 Boeing 767's into AF refueling jets AAAAND was CEO of SPC International, developer of the Flight Termination System, designed to overtake hijacked airliners and land them safely. How ironic. FTS could fly EIGHT PLANES at once.
One of the Bush brothers, Marvin Bush, was in charge of security. He had access to get people in there to prep the girders under the guise of doing some kind of work to the elevators about 2 weeks before 911. This is the story I remember.
I posted a great documentary I couldnt find in the heart of meme war.. showed again a few months back. Bush brothers own not only security detail there but also in the only military base the has military grade nano thermite
Which was found in air and dust samples. Week prior a caravan of white panel Van's went in around 12 and out around 530 am. With the elevator repair project they could have and likely did pack the towers w nano thermite. That's why in some clips from news you could see molten steel pouring out and why it burned under water as seen from space after slurry walls gave. And meanwhile a simulation was being run on this scenario in real time. At that location. And just that day before morning of hurricane Erin was set to hit at NYC. I was tracking that hurricane. But somehow "miraculously " did a hard right out to sea. Plans vs anything bug n solid turns into Wiley coyote. Hits flattens n slides off.
Exactly, listen to the CGI fag in the comments deriding video technology of the era while ignoring CGI shortcomings in 2001.
The CGI theory is a psyop to fracture consensus and alienate witnesses and victims from the foundation of Truth Movement >> INSIDE JOB through controlled demolition
And by the way, you're wrong. That's not the reason this was deleted. There was nothing uncivil about the original post. That's why you couldn't produce any evidence of that. And you were wrong twice. It wasn't posted three plus times. Stop exaggerating. It was posted once and ghosted.
You don't know a thing about controlled demolitions, do you?
Do you realize how much work went into weakening both buildings ( and WTC7) prior to demolition?
Funny how you're so skeptical about what millions of people witnessed with their own eyes, yet you claim the plane(s) everyone saw was AS DESCRIBED. Ever consider that was not a NORMAL JET but a retrofitted and reinforced flying bomb impacting @ over 600 kts? Furthermore, what would the drones be reinforced with? DEPLETED URANIUM is the answer and explains the high levels of radiation in the weeks and months at Ground Zero.
Cgi planes all the way at multiple angles imagine that. Cgi software can animate from multiple angles. Who could have time to focus their camera on a jet flying at wtc total BS!
There is no reason for CGI. And that "CGI" you speak of is better than even today's CGI. Why would you use CGI when using a real plane would be so much more effective to all the real people walking around? It's a terrible theory, one that cannot be proven.
and why so many cameras "trained" to capture the footage? I remember seeing somewhere that there were a number of people gathered in another skyscraper nearby, but far enough away - watching and waiting... sick people.
Your failing yourself believing that tv bullshit. You couldnt even get a camera angled well enough to get a shot expecially with 2001 equipment. Not a fucking chance.
We are not talking about the Pentagon but I'll oblige your question:
No plane impact at Pentagon, correct, but were there witnesses to a plane at the Pentagon? YES -- Many credible witnesses saw a plane flying low towards the Pentagon. Any credible witnesses to an impact? NO -- However, did credible witnesses DESTROY the 'Official Story', proving the plane was on a totally different approach angle, making it impossible for it to have hit the infamous light poles? YES
Those were NOT available within hours. I remember trying to find out what was going on. Nothing was available.
A few days after 9/11 a video came out of a plane that they claimed was heading towards the towers. It was a video from someone at street view of a plane flying low passing some tall buildings before going out of frame.
I don't think people are saying that nothing hit the buildings. They are just saying that is not the reason the buildings came down. Are we to believe that 3 buildings collapsed within their own footprint at freefall speed from 2 jet strikes?
I don't think we can drop 3 buildings without touching the others around them with missiles even now 20 years later.
Plus you have to wonder if they really wanted to strike a blow why not hit the nuclear power plants they flew over on the way to the towers from Boston. (Indian point power plant).
It that plant was hit and radiation was released everything from NYC to Boston would have been affected.
Okay, I just remember searching and nothing was available.
I was listening to WCBS newsradio 880 out of NYC the female announcer says a small plane just hit one of the towers. A little while later she said another small place hit the other tower. She even asked if it could possible be an attack. I was amazed that she would even ask that.
First of all, you're absolutely wrong. Every one of these views were shot LIVE and were available in the hours and days after the attacks.
You're referring to the view where the wing of the jet passes behind the Church Steeple IN THE FOREGROUND. You CGI fags call that a GLITCH when you can't even comprehend the concept of PERSPECTIVE.
First of all I think something hit the towers. I just don't think the towers came down because the jets hit them.
The video I was talking about did not show the towers anywhere. All it showed was one Jet flying low over the city. A guy on the street captured it. He only caught it for a couple of seconds before it went past some tall buildings. I am not sure what you mean about a Glitch. Maybe you are talking about another video
Also the day before 9/11 Rumsfeld announced that $2.3 trillion dollars went missing. The disappearing jet that hit the Pentagon hit the very area where naval investigations that were investigating the missing money were located.
There was a hole in the side of the Pentagon but no jet. Nothing of the jet was left on the outside. Not even the wings even though you could see they would not have fit into the hole.
Common sense would say that a missile hit the Pentagon. It went into the Pentagon (left the hole) and then blew up.
This was not done by some clowns living in caves in Afghanistan.
But it sure was used to go to war with at least five different countries.
There are 18 different videos of impact in the provided link in the op. The subtext of this submission is a challenge to CGI trolls and their disinformation. Did you watch all of them? Seems more important than vaguely recalling something you saw many years ago.
I think everybody with their eyes open knows the buildings were taken down in a controlled demolition. The CGI psyop was launched very early after 9/11 and it's to prevent normies from accepting the controlled demolition theory.
I recently watched a vid on this on bitchute by Ace Baker 9 11 which supported video editing of the broadcast, and one Dr Judy believes/d it was done by DEWS.
I got blasted on that theory too - lost a very close friend when I spoke of CGI.
I'll just say that, to me, it's not so much THAT a plane hit - I think it did, too.. but my research adds explosives. The plane wouldn't have done THAT much damage, plus, the plane would have been destroyed by the steel girders on the outside of the buildings.
I don't worry so much about the "means to the end" - it's WHO, WHAT, and WHY that cuts me to the heart. So, eh, whatever distractions are attempted, proven, guess-work - those are HOWs - I want the "W"s and I want them ALL.
Very fair comment.
The buildings were taken down in a controlled demolition, correct.
What process occurs in the months before ANY and EVERY controlled demolition?
A WEAKENING OF THE STRUCTURE
There is your answer. The entry points of both towers were compromised prior to the attacks.
Want to know the who? >> DOV ZAKHEIM << Central Figure in 9/11 Plot // Zakheim the Pentagon Comptroller, looking for Rumsfeld's missing $2.3 Trillion AAAND he had a contract with the US Air Force to retrofit 36 Boeing 767's into AF refueling jets AAAAND was CEO of SPC International, developer of the Flight Termination System, designed to overtake hijacked airliners and land them safely. How ironic. FTS could fly EIGHT PLANES at once.
http://christiansagainstzionism.50megs.com/dan_zakheim.htm
One of the Bush brothers, Marvin Bush, was in charge of security. He had access to get people in there to prep the girders under the guise of doing some kind of work to the elevators about 2 weeks before 911. This is the story I remember.
I posted a great documentary I couldnt find in the heart of meme war.. showed again a few months back. Bush brothers own not only security detail there but also in the only military base the has military grade nano thermite Which was found in air and dust samples. Week prior a caravan of white panel Van's went in around 12 and out around 530 am. With the elevator repair project they could have and likely did pack the towers w nano thermite. That's why in some clips from news you could see molten steel pouring out and why it burned under water as seen from space after slurry walls gave. And meanwhile a simulation was being run on this scenario in real time. At that location. And just that day before morning of hurricane Erin was set to hit at NYC. I was tracking that hurricane. But somehow "miraculously " did a hard right out to sea. Plans vs anything bug n solid turns into Wiley coyote. Hits flattens n slides off.
Look into the E Thing. Certainly controlled demolition.
Yes planes hit both towers. Probably not the Pentagon. Flight 93 was downed, not crashed.
I know it well and I'm glad you brought it up.
It's actually the E-TEAM and the B-THING.
The window where the E-Team built its 'art installation' on the 91st floor was less than 30ft from the impact point of Flight 77
If those planes were all CGI they did a wonderful job, like better CGI than we even have today. Lol
Exactly, listen to the CGI fag in the comments deriding video technology of the era while ignoring CGI shortcomings in 2001.
The CGI theory is a psyop to fracture consensus and alienate witnesses and victims from the foundation of Truth Movement >> INSIDE JOB through controlled demolition
Also the supposed phone calls from the plane were at least mostly faked.
hey fren... can you tell me if this post is still appearing on your end
I think mods ghosted it from the main board.
I can get to it through a direct link, but you are correct, it's hidden if you filter by newest and scroll down. It's gone.
thanks... very odd it would be ghosted, no?
Is this not The Great Awakening? lol
Everyone is human, sometimes mis/Disinformation affects the mods too. We all have our blind spots.
The way the software works, a mod removed post will still be visible via profiles.
thanks, I know that..
Why don't you point out in this thread where I wasn't civil. Can you formulate a relevant comment, outside your obnoxious judgment?
Really, just exactly who do you think you are?
Stick to the prayer threads, Ryan.
And by the way, you're wrong. That's not the reason this was deleted. There was nothing uncivil about the original post. That's why you couldn't produce any evidence of that. And you were wrong twice. It wasn't posted three plus times. Stop exaggerating. It was posted once and ghosted.
Aluminum plane flies effortlessly through reinforced steel concrete and rebar buildings bahahaha 😂🤣😂🤣
Weakened structure at point of impact.
You don't know a thing about controlled demolitions, do you?
Do you realize how much work went into weakening both buildings ( and WTC7) prior to demolition?
Funny how you're so skeptical about what millions of people witnessed with their own eyes, yet you claim the plane(s) everyone saw was AS DESCRIBED. Ever consider that was not a NORMAL JET but a retrofitted and reinforced flying bomb impacting @ over 600 kts? Furthermore, what would the drones be reinforced with? DEPLETED URANIUM is the answer and explains the high levels of radiation in the weeks and months at Ground Zero.
lol NEXT!!
Could you also explain to me how jet fuel DOESNT burn passport paper? Stay charming 😘
Lol aluminum lol point and laugh at the retard
To me it matters less whether a plane hit or not. What matters most is that they demoed the buildings.
When you know the HOW, you will find the answer to WHO...
If you are truly interested in finding the answer, start right here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNTI51V_xvk
Cgi planes all the way at multiple angles imagine that. Cgi software can animate from multiple angles. Who could have time to focus their camera on a jet flying at wtc total BS!
There is no reason for CGI. And that "CGI" you speak of is better than even today's CGI. Why would you use CGI when using a real plane would be so much more effective to all the real people walking around? It's a terrible theory, one that cannot be proven.
What IS proven is way too many people saw it IRL for it to be CGI. NYC is kinda a populated place..
Exactly.
and why so many cameras "trained" to capture the footage? I remember seeing somewhere that there were a number of people gathered in another skyscraper nearby, but far enough away - watching and waiting... sick people.
lol Are you serious?
WTC 1 WAS ON FIRE and you're shocked people were filming it?
FAIL
Your failing yourself believing that tv bullshit. You couldnt even get a camera angled well enough to get a shot expecially with 2001 equipment. Not a fucking chance.
^ this is what CGI fags call 'reason'
2001 video equipment ? Really? Tell us all about 2001 CGI technology, then.
Now explain the sound, including the screams, jet engines and impact.
Was the debris exiting the opposite side of the building CGI, too? How did a REAL jet engine wind up on the sidewalk? More CGI?
FAIL
How did an airplane disappear from the pentagon? What's your theory on that one?
We are not talking about the Pentagon but I'll oblige your question:
No plane impact at Pentagon, correct, but were there witnesses to a plane at the Pentagon? YES -- Many credible witnesses saw a plane flying low towards the Pentagon. Any credible witnesses to an impact? NO -- However, did credible witnesses DESTROY the 'Official Story', proving the plane was on a totally different approach angle, making it impossible for it to have hit the infamous light poles? YES
Watch this video, it will open your eyes wide:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=elKov_UZDQE
It's good enough to fool your ass
Those were NOT available within hours. I remember trying to find out what was going on. Nothing was available.
A few days after 9/11 a video came out of a plane that they claimed was heading towards the towers. It was a video from someone at street view of a plane flying low passing some tall buildings before going out of frame. I don't think people are saying that nothing hit the buildings. They are just saying that is not the reason the buildings came down. Are we to believe that 3 buildings collapsed within their own footprint at freefall speed from 2 jet strikes? I don't think we can drop 3 buildings without touching the others around them with missiles even now 20 years later.
Plus you have to wonder if they really wanted to strike a blow why not hit the nuclear power plants they flew over on the way to the towers from Boston. (Indian point power plant). It that plant was hit and radiation was released everything from NYC to Boston would have been affected.
Live video was avalible after the first strike. I watched it at the time.
Yes so did I.
Okay, I just remember searching and nothing was available. I was listening to WCBS newsradio 880 out of NYC the female announcer says a small plane just hit one of the towers. A little while later she said another small place hit the other tower. She even asked if it could possible be an attack. I was amazed that she would even ask that.
I watched the second one hit on fox news, I heard the first one on the radio.
First of all, you're absolutely wrong. Every one of these views were shot LIVE and were available in the hours and days after the attacks.
You're referring to the view where the wing of the jet passes behind the Church Steeple IN THE FOREGROUND. You CGI fags call that a GLITCH when you can't even comprehend the concept of PERSPECTIVE.
FAIL
First of all I think something hit the towers. I just don't think the towers came down because the jets hit them.
The video I was talking about did not show the towers anywhere. All it showed was one Jet flying low over the city. A guy on the street captured it. He only caught it for a couple of seconds before it went past some tall buildings. I am not sure what you mean about a Glitch. Maybe you are talking about another video
Also the day before 9/11 Rumsfeld announced that $2.3 trillion dollars went missing. The disappearing jet that hit the Pentagon hit the very area where naval investigations that were investigating the missing money were located. There was a hole in the side of the Pentagon but no jet. Nothing of the jet was left on the outside. Not even the wings even though you could see they would not have fit into the hole. Common sense would say that a missile hit the Pentagon. It went into the Pentagon (left the hole) and then blew up. This was not done by some clowns living in caves in Afghanistan. But it sure was used to go to war with at least five different countries.
There are 18 different videos of impact in the provided link in the op. The subtext of this submission is a challenge to CGI trolls and their disinformation. Did you watch all of them? Seems more important than vaguely recalling something you saw many years ago.
I think everybody with their eyes open knows the buildings were taken down in a controlled demolition. The CGI psyop was launched very early after 9/11 and it's to prevent normies from accepting the controlled demolition theory.
Not vaguely but I do admit I did not have cable TV. My searching was on the net which was not quite the same as today
3.38-3.42 are the most telling few seconds of this compilation. I have watched this clip thousands of times since that day.
I recently watched a vid on this on bitchute by Ace Baker 9 11 which supported video editing of the broadcast, and one Dr Judy believes/d it was done by DEWS.
DEW theory is yet another psyop. If Dr Judy was so convinced, where is she today? She puts far less effort into defending her theory than I do my own.