As I have commented in the past, the "Disinformation is necessary" thing kinda throws a big monkey wrench into how we interpret the entire Q catalogue. It's understandable, however frustrating.
In JFK Jrs defence he did vow to take out the CIA even if he has to take down the entire government, isn't that partly what Q is suggesting will happen? The entire system collapses on itself when people understand the wider truths of how it is run?
Thank you. Why do we have to keep settling this issue... oh that's right, shilly shills keep bringing this up. Does that add another point to RFK Jr being on the "wrong side"?
Q's first mention of JFK Jr. is on 4/8. He's lining up to be the 48th President. The video Trump posted is on the exact 28 month anniversary of Q's start. #Kennedy28
So since Sr has passed away, it would be easy to say that after Jr’s disappearance he could remerge later without the Jr in his name…. So the name died, not the person.
Youre not wrong, but I dont think you understand what I'm getting at. Youre bound by case law due to your implied consent of conducting business within the frame work of the government, it is a corporate setting. Drivers license, taxes, obeying the speed limit, all of it are expected of you if you want to participate in that corporate setting. Jfk jr is not alive according to this corporation, the name is no longer participating. If what the point we're getting at is true, Q was not wrong saying JFK Jr. Is not alive.
hey wow. i missed this one. buuut then there's this u/#q2611
Q also said disinformation is necessary but we don’t know if the “touching his nose” is disinformation or the “NO” is disinformation.
This all reminds me of terminator 4 where you couldn’t tell who was who.
Ain’t war hell?
As I have commented in the past, the "Disinformation is necessary" thing kinda throws a big monkey wrench into how we interpret the entire Q catalogue. It's understandable, however frustrating.
Honestly. This is dumb. What answer would anyone expect? "Yes, but don't tell anyone yet. It's a secret"?
No matter what, Q would say no.
Yes okay. This q drop is dumb. Sure.
In JFK Jrs defence he did vow to take out the CIA even if he has to take down the entire government, isn't that partly what Q is suggesting will happen? The entire system collapses on itself when people understand the wider truths of how it is run?
Thank you. Why do we have to keep settling this issue... oh that's right, shilly shills keep bringing this up. Does that add another point to RFK Jr being on the "wrong side"?
Q's first mention of JFK Jr. is on 4/8. He's lining up to be the 48th President. The video Trump posted is on the exact 28 month anniversary of Q's start. #Kennedy28
So since Sr has passed away, it would be easy to say that after Jr’s disappearance he could remerge later without the Jr in his name…. So the name died, not the person.
Your birth name is part of your contract agreement to conduct business within the corporation of the United States.
We are a Constitutional Republic, plus it takes nothing to get a name change.
Youre not wrong, but I dont think you understand what I'm getting at. Youre bound by case law due to your implied consent of conducting business within the frame work of the government, it is a corporate setting. Drivers license, taxes, obeying the speed limit, all of it are expected of you if you want to participate in that corporate setting. Jfk jr is not alive according to this corporation, the name is no longer participating. If what the point we're getting at is true, Q was not wrong saying JFK Jr. Is not alive.
One theory is that technically, he is no longer "Jr", so 2611 technically correct.