There is a LOT more to this than meets the eye. I had a made a post about all the critical things that happened between 1971 to 1973 that all linked together.
Vietnam War Ending (Nixon took office in '71 and ended the war in '73)
Going off the Gold Standard ('71 dollar devaluated, by '73 Nixon gets rid of gold standard)
Arab Israeli war, Oil Wars
Petro Dollar instituted
Roe Vs Wade (filed in 1971, decided in 1973)
Basically the Fed based fiat system was falling apart. So, the powers behind the scenes decided to transition into a new system: From Bretton Woods to Petro-dollars. This much is pretty obvious.
But the implication was that a while new wealth transfer was enabled and according the new agenda was set in place to capitalize on this.
The agenda revolving around Technology, which requires huge amount of immigration. Immigration requires population control. Population control requires abortions. This is what RBG was alluding to.
It seems to be a compromise reached behind the scenes that they will allow immigrant flow into the country only if there is a way to control that population.
TL;DR - Roe vs Wade was part of a change of guard with in the Cabal system.
(Nixon won Nov 1968 election and took office in early 1969)
Thanks for that.
By the time Nixon took office, the illusion of Cold War - the primary "world order" for the Cabal to control the world had well past fallen apart. I go into details of this one in a past post, happy to link if you like - but Stalin actually kicked the Cabal out of USSR and the rest was just inevitable wind down. Breznev had taken over from the Cabal asset Kruschev, and both of them had behind the scenes plan to normalize relations.
So I theorize that the need for a switch in the world order was well past due by then. The critical piece of the puzzle happened in 1971 that I forgot to include:
WEF is the vehicle for the "Great Reset" as commonly known, but actually transferring the system of control from the only war based control to the new technology based control.
1972 - First modern day Silicon Valley VC firms Sequoia and Kleiner Perkins who were both, incidentally, first round investors in Google (and they were rival firms, so it was noted in the industry)
Incidentally, Sequoia focusing on what we call Big Tech - Apple, Amazon, Google etc, while Kleiner Perkins also, in addition prides itself on focusin on "life sciences" with companies like Genentech, Beyond Meat etc.
Is it a coincidence that WEF - that wants to replace humanity with silicon based lifeforms was created two weeks after the name Silicon Valley was coined?
Do you know their reasoning?
Yes, I believe they realized that they could not keep controlling the world with more and more variations of the same cenrtral bank fiat scam. They needed centralized control and the only way to make that happen is huge leap in technology. (Make no mistake - the tech itself came from the Cabal/CIA/Darpa etc, the tech sector was the required optics to unveil it, and productise it)
If you are a CEO of a company, and your company just expanded their operation massively with huge funding infusion, would you not start recruiting for talent?
Same thing here. The Cabal own the America Inc and when they planned on expanding their operations they needed to recruit more people - aka immigration. That is not just it. If my theory is correct, you will also see expansion in education system - both in US and around the world, to start creating some of these new recruits that are do not even exist.
And there were other factions of the Cabal who based their operations outside - for instance Japan. But America Inc has been their primary vehicle of control since transition from Britain after WW2 and hence the main focus is always there.
BTW, you might have the wrong impression about the immigrants we are talking about. We are not talking about Mexicans or Africans. We are talking about Asians - who as you can see now, are very dominant in Big Tech.
Getting Americans to switch gears into this mode would have required not just education but a much bigger social change that would not have worked in this timeline.
H1B’s and whatnot aren’t placed for their real ability, it’s just to displace natives. Most tech breakthroughs are still by whites, and Chinese and Indians try to copy. If Vijaya Gadde was dominant, it was just because she was handed an executive position in exchange for her suppressing heritage Americans. She didn’t bring any special talent to the table.
Grunt workers were almost 80% non white. I was in the valley during dot com years. I have seen the make up of hitech companies first hand. It was pretty common, even then to be in a meeting room full of Asians and no Whites, or usually the manager would be White.
Its not about the ability, but the availability at low cost + ability to condition them ideologically.
In 1984, Sequoia purchased the voting machine business of AVM Corporation (the former Automatic Voting Machine Corporation) and was reorganized as Sequoia Voting Systems.
Not sure if its the same Sequoia or not, but with the same name, makes me think there must at least be some connection if not the same.
There is a LOT more to this than meets the eye. I had a made a post about all the critical things that happened between 1971 to 1973 that all linked together.
Vietnam War Ending (Nixon took office in '71 and ended the war in '73)
Going off the Gold Standard ('71 dollar devaluated, by '73 Nixon gets rid of gold standard)
Arab Israeli war, Oil Wars
Petro Dollar instituted
Roe Vs Wade (filed in 1971, decided in 1973)
Basically the Fed based fiat system was falling apart. So, the powers behind the scenes decided to transition into a new system: From Bretton Woods to Petro-dollars. This much is pretty obvious.
But the implication was that a while new wealth transfer was enabled and according the new agenda was set in place to capitalize on this.
The agenda revolving around Technology, which requires huge amount of immigration. Immigration requires population control. Population control requires abortions. This is what RBG was alluding to.
It seems to be a compromise reached behind the scenes that they will allow immigrant flow into the country only if there is a way to control that population.
TL;DR - Roe vs Wade was part of a change of guard with in the Cabal system.
(Nixon won Nov 1968 election and took office in early 1969)
“Technology, which requires huge amount of immigration.”
This seems to be less your opinion than that of the powers at the time. Do you know their reasoning?
Thanks for that.
By the time Nixon took office, the illusion of Cold War - the primary "world order" for the Cabal to control the world had well past fallen apart. I go into details of this one in a past post, happy to link if you like - but Stalin actually kicked the Cabal out of USSR and the rest was just inevitable wind down. Breznev had taken over from the Cabal asset Kruschev, and both of them had behind the scenes plan to normalize relations.
So I theorize that the need for a switch in the world order was well past due by then. The critical piece of the puzzle happened in 1971 that I forgot to include:
24 January 1971 - Klaus Scwab founded WEF.
WEF is the vehicle for the "Great Reset" as commonly known, but actually transferring the system of control from the only war based control to the new technology based control.
Wait, thats not all.
Nov 15 1971 - First CPU was released by Intel
Continuing this timeline, lets see where Roe Vs Wade fits?
Dec 13 1971 - First arguments heard in Roe V Wade
Okay, is that all? Not by a long shot:
Jan 10 1971 - journalist Don Hoefler gave Silicon Valley its famous name
1972 - First modern day Silicon Valley VC firms Sequoia and Kleiner Perkins who were both, incidentally, first round investors in Google (and they were rival firms, so it was noted in the industry)
Incidentally, Sequoia focusing on what we call Big Tech - Apple, Amazon, Google etc, while Kleiner Perkins also, in addition prides itself on focusin on "life sciences" with companies like Genentech, Beyond Meat etc.
Is it a coincidence that WEF - that wants to replace humanity with silicon based lifeforms was created two weeks after the name Silicon Valley was coined?
Yes, I believe they realized that they could not keep controlling the world with more and more variations of the same cenrtral bank fiat scam. They needed centralized control and the only way to make that happen is huge leap in technology. (Make no mistake - the tech itself came from the Cabal/CIA/Darpa etc, the tech sector was the required optics to unveil it, and productise it)
You’ve got me thinking about Christopher Walken as Max Zorin in A View to a Kill.
Anyway, why did the elites think that technology requires huge amounts of immigration?
The answer is simpl - Business management 101
If you are a CEO of a company, and your company just expanded their operation massively with huge funding infusion, would you not start recruiting for talent?
Same thing here. The Cabal own the America Inc and when they planned on expanding their operations they needed to recruit more people - aka immigration. That is not just it. If my theory is correct, you will also see expansion in education system - both in US and around the world, to start creating some of these new recruits that are do not even exist.
And there were other factions of the Cabal who based their operations outside - for instance Japan. But America Inc has been their primary vehicle of control since transition from Britain after WW2 and hence the main focus is always there.
BTW, you might have the wrong impression about the immigrants we are talking about. We are not talking about Mexicans or Africans. We are talking about Asians - who as you can see now, are very dominant in Big Tech.
Getting Americans to switch gears into this mode would have required not just education but a much bigger social change that would not have worked in this timeline.
H1B’s and whatnot aren’t placed for their real ability, it’s just to displace natives. Most tech breakthroughs are still by whites, and Chinese and Indians try to copy. If Vijaya Gadde was dominant, it was just because she was handed an executive position in exchange for her suppressing heritage Americans. She didn’t bring any special talent to the table.
Grunt workers were almost 80% non white. I was in the valley during dot com years. I have seen the make up of hitech companies first hand. It was pretty common, even then to be in a meeting room full of Asians and no Whites, or usually the manager would be White.
Its not about the ability, but the availability at low cost + ability to condition them ideologically.
“Its not about the ability, but the availability at low cost + ability to condition them ideologically.”
Right. So huge immigration is for cheap tech rather than high tech, but mostly just to replace people who have American ideals.
This is all great research! You should look into the great depression, as the first attempt at a global great reset into global communism!
Not sure if it's the same company, but wasn't Sequoia one of the first out of the gate with voting machines?
You are right, its the same name
And, they say:
Not sure if its the same Sequoia or not, but with the same name, makes me think there must at least be some connection if not the same.
https://twitter.com/glennbeck/status/1664295254218899457?s=61&t=s3G0ypqOAR4Ics6B1FW6YA
The Pharisees hate humanity period.
Wow
oh good, a pro-eugenics supreme court