My brother's wife delivered a set of twins a few years ago. The Dr. showed up with this vitamin k shot shortly after delivery. My brother refused it. He said it was something like 10k times a recommended dosage for an infant and it wasn't going to happen. The Dr told my brother the twins could die without it. He scooped up his wife and the twins and split.
I'm pregnant and I am comforted to know that someone else had the courage to do this too. The only thing I worry about is them taking away the baby to inject it without my knowledge or consent. I'm having none of this shit in my child! Ever!
So in my Twittering I stumble across this thread and made me curious to know more about the vitamin K shot.
Lots of the same illogical arguments that were used for the vaccine. It's been around a long time so it must be good. The dose level is higher than recommended but that's ok because we place the shot in the muscle. Doctors recommend it so it must be good. Pediatric associations recommend it so it must be good. Everyone else is doing it. Etc.
So does anyone have any good Vitamin K resources to examine?
All I can seem to see is that most newborns don't need elevated levels of vitamin K, however, if the mother had needed to take a blood thinner while pregnant, that can cause some issues with the baby that would require higher levels of vitamin K.
I've heard that vitamin K can help with depression, but that doesn't really speak to what kind of stuff they put in anti-depressants. Whatever the case, a vitamin K shot for the average newborn shouldn't be necessary. I could see arguments for newborns when the mother has been given drugs that inhibit vitamin K, but I would think there should be other, less dangerous, ways to increase vitamin K in infants.
Usually with newborns, they give out the Hepatitis B shot with the Vitamin K shot. Hep B tends to cause blood thinning, and the Vit K shot is supposed to counteract the bleeding, and promote clotting. Problem is, it's at a level 10,000x above the healthy threshold for newborns, therefore causing the bar to be set higher for the baby's needs, and keeping those basic "necessary levels" artificially high for life. This causes babies to be almost completely dependent on formula and shot after shot and destroys their bodies' natural ability to maintain itself. The more you take away from your body's self regulating abilities, the more dependent you are on Big Pharma for your whole lifetime. What is actually wrong with women just eating foods rich in the necessary vitamins and minerals and maintaining a natural level of homeostasis? The pharma authorities don't want you to not take it, because they've been brainwashed to believe that they're doing the right thing, and will fight you tooth and nail, even as far as injecting your child without your consent. So correct me if I'm wrong here, but I thought this answers your question.
Also part of the same thing. Inject the baby with a high level of Vitamin K from day 1, and keep the tolerances high enough that they need formula to survive. This is a continuance of the same game. Get children fucked up from day one, and then make them pharma babies for life
My brother's wife delivered a set of twins a few years ago. The Dr. showed up with this vitamin k shot shortly after delivery. My brother refused it. He said it was something like 10k times a recommended dosage for an infant and it wasn't going to happen. The Dr told my brother the twins could die without it. He scooped up his wife and the twins and split.
I'm pregnant and I am comforted to know that someone else had the courage to do this too. The only thing I worry about is them taking away the baby to inject it without my knowledge or consent. I'm having none of this shit in my child! Ever!
Yep. These jabs right out of the womb are stupid. Glad he left.
Looks like nature gets it wrong again guys, and all babies are deficient. Thankfully The Science™️ saves the day.
Yeah isn't that a confidence-inspiring assumption they make, which also happens to undermine the theory of evolution? Which is it Science? 🤣
Vitamin K is great, but shots in babies are not. Just advise mothers to have good amounts of K in their bodies. Grass-fed butter is a good source.
That increases vitamin D.
What they give is synthetic vitamin K. That in itself is not good. This is a pretty good explanation. The blogger is an RN. https://deeprootsathome.com/newborns-two-brands-vitamin-k/
True Blood
So in my Twittering I stumble across this thread and made me curious to know more about the vitamin K shot.
Lots of the same illogical arguments that were used for the vaccine. It's been around a long time so it must be good. The dose level is higher than recommended but that's ok because we place the shot in the muscle. Doctors recommend it so it must be good. Pediatric associations recommend it so it must be good. Everyone else is doing it. Etc.
So does anyone have any good Vitamin K resources to examine?
All I can seem to see is that most newborns don't need elevated levels of vitamin K, however, if the mother had needed to take a blood thinner while pregnant, that can cause some issues with the baby that would require higher levels of vitamin K.
Yeah I'm reading blood thinners, anti-biotics, anti-epileptics, tuberculosis drugs. Drugs that inhibit vitamin K.
I wonder if anti depressants fall in that category. Blood thinners and anti-biotics are widely prescribed.
I've heard that vitamin K can help with depression, but that doesn't really speak to what kind of stuff they put in anti-depressants. Whatever the case, a vitamin K shot for the average newborn shouldn't be necessary. I could see arguments for newborns when the mother has been given drugs that inhibit vitamin K, but I would think there should be other, less dangerous, ways to increase vitamin K in infants.
Question #1: When did doctors begin giving babies vitamin K shots?
Question #2: How did the human race manage to survive before doctors began giving babies vitamin K shots?
'Nuff said.
It sounds like Europe is offered a two dose oral alternative.
No sauce on my part, but I wonder if it helps calcify the pineal gland? 🤷♂️
Semi-crappy sauce on what the gland does: Pineal Gland
Yes another way of looking at this is:
Why do they want to give a high dose vitamin K to newborns?
Great article on this!
https://drbenkim.com/vitamin-K-shot-baby.html
Usually with newborns, they give out the Hepatitis B shot with the Vitamin K shot. Hep B tends to cause blood thinning, and the Vit K shot is supposed to counteract the bleeding, and promote clotting. Problem is, it's at a level 10,000x above the healthy threshold for newborns, therefore causing the bar to be set higher for the baby's needs, and keeping those basic "necessary levels" artificially high for life. This causes babies to be almost completely dependent on formula and shot after shot and destroys their bodies' natural ability to maintain itself. The more you take away from your body's self regulating abilities, the more dependent you are on Big Pharma for your whole lifetime. What is actually wrong with women just eating foods rich in the necessary vitamins and minerals and maintaining a natural level of homeostasis? The pharma authorities don't want you to not take it, because they've been brainwashed to believe that they're doing the right thing, and will fight you tooth and nail, even as far as injecting your child without your consent. So correct me if I'm wrong here, but I thought this answers your question.
I would think vitamin K does the opposite. It directs calcium out of soft tissue and into bones. I actually take it for this reason, among others.
Ok also interesting is formula has more vitamin K added than occurs naturally in breast milk.
Also part of the same thing. Inject the baby with a high level of Vitamin K from day 1, and keep the tolerances high enough that they need formula to survive. This is a continuance of the same game. Get children fucked up from day one, and then make them pharma babies for life
Here's some ai fodder on the whole vitamin k topic. Interesting the WHO alledgly supported it. https://chat.openai.com/share/88d5ae86-c5b1-4dba-bac9-b89a9be3351f
Interesting. He was a member of the first Nobel meeting..