Yes, IMHO the author is either Pollyanna naive and ignoring the abuses already occurring or is a charlatan for CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currency). After all, he said,
"I don’t fear any of this. (ergo, Central Bank Digital Currency).
The author then says,
"Digital currency is based on one thing: Blockchain technology.
Blockchain is a distributed ledger technology that is decentralized. The opposite of what the cabal wants, and clearly not their plan."
IMHO, all digital currency is vapor-ware. If you don't possess it, you will lose it sooner or later. This is why the old-age saying, "Possession is nine-tenths of the law". It has been shown that Bitcoin and others competing brands are controlled false fronts being used to 'normalize' digital currency, so that out of the ashes rises the CBDC. In the CCP, it took one act to eliminate blockchain digital currencies. In Canada, we saw how the Trudeau government shutdown and seize the trucker protesters bank accounts and crypto-currency accounts. Again, possession is nine-tenths of the law. He then states,
"Does anybody think that Bitcoin was part of the cabal plan? A technology that decentralizes things and makes transactions open and transparent?"
I have seen reports that it is being used by the cabal as I mentioned above.
"They have been forced to compete with technology that is improving because of cryptocurrencies and innovations from fintech companies."
Central banks don't compete. That's the problem. It is the biggest monopoly in history and the biggest Ponzi scheme in all of history. They're joined at the hip of nearly every government in the world. That is called fascism. Just ask Muammar Gaddafi competing with the Central banks. Jonathan Mays, etc. The Central Banks are already using their power of being joined to government (fascism) to bring down cryptocurrencies.
In addition, BRICS being based on 50% gold is indeed a good thing, but is it redeemable in gold? In other words, will any individual be able to exchange the currency into physical gold? It's too early to tell. Moreover, this multi-polar currency will be digital too. Again, we are back to vapor-ware and actual possession. Digital currency is the antithesis of physical possession.
And then there is this. I got rid of my cell phone 6-years ago because I saw this coming. I will not be part of the Beast System. This will be the hill I die on.
As a metaphor, this is true only if there is trust that the paper denomination is redeemable in gold and can be exchanged to gold. Paper denominations are a receipt for 'something' of value.
Older dollars stated on the paper denomination that it was redeemable in gold. For example, 1928 five dollar bills are special because they were redeemable in gold. They read, “Redeemable In Gold On Demand At The United States Treasury, Or In Gold Or Lawful Money At Any Federal Reserve Bank.” The above phrase is known as the gold clause. This phrase does not make 1928 Federal Reserve note five dollar bills also gold certificates. Gold certificates have a gold seal and were not even printed for the five dollar denomination in 1928. There's more examples than this, but the history of what was printed on dollars tells a story and that is of confiscation of the peoples gold and silver.
Most ordinary people didn't act to redeem the paper currency to gold. They could have, if the chose to do so. They were satisfied with the paper denomination as their receipt for 'something' of value due to the trust in government to make good on their promise.
The Golden Rule: Whoever has the gold makes the Rules. If the individual doesn't physically possess gold and silver, problems of theft will soon after occur. Governments are always very good at doing this. BRICS may give us a set of new problems, but at least it is better than FRBS.
Then there is those pesky details around Jeffrey Epstein and his pedo pals being deeply embedded in the MIT departments that developed good ol' bitcoin.
No one seems to talk about that one. Not just supporting. Embedded.
I'm glad you brought that up. I do recall reading about this. The MIT departments that developed Bitcoin was funded by 'someone' that I don't recall. Was it DARPA? or someone else? There is a hidden hand in all of this crypto-currency. The Epstein connection illustrates the seeming direction.
If you have more info on this, I'd be interested in reading more on the subject.
I know Epstein funded the company that's working on the lightning network which is an attempt to centralize Bitcoin. Of course they're going to try to infiltrate it.
IMHO, all digital currency is vapor-ware. If you don't possess it, you will lose it sooner or later. This is why the old-age saying, "Possession is nine-tenths of the law".
By that logic, is any software NOT vaporware? The thing you must possess is the private key, which you can generate offline and is meant to be kept secure and backed up, hence the word private.
It has been shown that Bitcoin and others competing brands are controlled false fronts being used to 'normalize' digital currency, so that out of the ashes rises the CBDC.
Bitcoin is an open source technology, like Linux or Email. It was always meant to be forked and experimented with. I happen to prefer a different version of Bitcoin called Bitcoin Cash, which forked away from BTC in 2017 due to the BTC dev team refusing to increase Bitcoin's block size, which severely crippled its growth. That is the reason for the explosion of shitcoins because they couldn't build on BTC due to its limited capacity.
In the CCP, it took one act to eliminate blockchain digital currencies. In Canada, we saw how the Trudeau government shutdown and seize the trucker protesters bank accounts and crypto-currency accounts.
I don't know what you are talking about with the CCP, Bitcoin is still alive and well in China. Most of the miners and mining hardware manufacturers are there too.
In Canada the reason people's funds were able to be seized was they were using centralized exchanges and third party intermediaries. Whoever set up the donation address used a custodial wallet and that was their mistake. If they had set up a private multisig wallet, yeah, maybe the government would be able to track it, but they couldn't have seized it.
The Canadian Truckers is more of an argument for digital privacy. If they had used Monero, no one would have had their money stolen, or even heard about it.
Central banks don't compete.
Right. And now they have to. They grew accustomed to their monopoly and Bitcoin knocked it off track. Do you recall the Silk Road? It's what alerted most of the feds to the threat that Bitcoin posed, because people were able to trade online anonymously and it scared the shit out of them, to the point they created a whole psyop to twist the message of Bitcoin from "A Swiss bank in everyone's pocket" to "HODL LaMbOs To ThE mOoN bRoOoO!" and its been downhill from there.
You practically answered your own question. This question addresses all others. It takes one electrical surge and 'poof' it's gone. Electrical pulses are a poor substitute for something of value. Even the paper denomination is suppose to be a receipt for 'something' of value is obviously more material than an electrical pulse. Like Mexico's paper denominations in the 1980s that became worthless, at least people who ended up having them can say for posterity that it symbolizes why physical gold and silver are things that always has value. That paper denominations are not anything of value.
This leads me to the question that hasn't been answered. The CBDC in the current form is the same Ponzi scheme as the fractional reserve system. All Ponzi schemes accelerate before they collapse. This is what we are now witnessing. There is no way to remain master over a Ponzi scheme. So, the old one has to be ended and a new one created. Ponzi schemes are inherently illegal. Yet, this is what the fractional reserve banking system is. The reason it survived this long is because governments are enjoined to it and enforce it. Ending the Ponzi scheme with another that is worldwide doesn't solve the inherent characteristics of all Ponzi schemes. That is, a Ponzi scheme always accelerates out of control. Presently, the paper denomination is suppose to be a receipt for 'something' of value. Bretton Woods II removed gold as that 'something' that backed it.
So, the question always comes down to "Who controls the gold?" This is the shell game that's being played. In the current system, there isn't really any gold being played in the shell game.... At least to the plebeian individual that is. Notwithstanding, governments and global elite use it to give backing to the FRBS system. Gold and silver has always had intrinsic value. This is incontrovertible throughout history. Therefore, it is as if it is God's currency. At least BRICS recognizes its monetary system needs to be backed by at least 50% gold. Ghadafi had the same idea for his pan-African currency. The West stole all of Ghadafi's gold. My reservation to BRICS is whether the individual can redeem currency in physical gold? The Golden Rule: Whoever has the gold makes the Rules. If the individual doesn't physically possess gold and silver, problems of theft will soon after occur. Governments are good at doing this.
Well stated. You're explaining some of the reasons I'm suspicious of crypto. All that anyone has to do is kill the electricity somewhere and you have no access to your wealth. Deal-killer. We live in a physical world, our liquid wealth must be physical and tangible.
There's also the question of why we've gone --what, 20 years?-- with crypto and it's still not consistently tradeable into physical assets. Billions in digital coins traded on digital platforms, and they have no more of a use than baseball cards.
I have faith in BRICS. Their gold backed currency will be a stablecoin that ends central bank funny money and fiat manipulation. Plus, Trump's BFF Muhammed bin Salman will be a huge influence in that system. I'm excited.
All that anyone has to do is kill the electricity somewhere and you have no access to your wealth. Deal-killer. We live in a physical world, our liquid wealth must be physical and tangible.
A very small fraction of dollars have any sort of physical existence.
There's also the question of why we've gone --what, 20 years?-- with crypto and it's still not consistently tradeable into physical assets.
15 years and It's trivially easy to convert crypto into any physical asset. Or stocks, bonds etc.
I have faith in BRICS. Their gold backed currency will be a stablecoin that ends central bank funny money and fiat manipulation.
It's a good point you make. I recognize BRICS as an answer to ending the fractional reserve systems Ponzi Scheme. All Ponzi schemes accelerate out of control. This is what we are now witnessing with the FRBS. BRICS is there to prevent the Cabal's attempt to create a digital Ponzi Scheme.
As long as currency is not redeemable in gold, there will be problems. The Golden Rule: Whoever has the gold makes the Rules. If the individual doesn't physically possess gold and silver, problems of theft will soon after occur. Governments are good at doing this. BRICS may give us a set of new problems, but at least it is better than FRBS.
IMHO, no. CBDC represents uni-polar private control. Trump favors multi-polar money system.
Did you read the article?
Yes, IMHO the author is either Pollyanna naive and ignoring the abuses already occurring or is a charlatan for CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currency). After all, he said,
The author then says,
IMHO, all digital currency is vapor-ware. If you don't possess it, you will lose it sooner or later. This is why the old-age saying, "Possession is nine-tenths of the law". It has been shown that Bitcoin and others competing brands are controlled false fronts being used to 'normalize' digital currency, so that out of the ashes rises the CBDC. In the CCP, it took one act to eliminate blockchain digital currencies. In Canada, we saw how the Trudeau government shutdown and seize the trucker protesters bank accounts and crypto-currency accounts. Again, possession is nine-tenths of the law. He then states,
I have seen reports that it is being used by the cabal as I mentioned above.
Central banks don't compete. That's the problem. It is the biggest monopoly in history and the biggest Ponzi scheme in all of history. They're joined at the hip of nearly every government in the world. That is called fascism. Just ask Muammar Gaddafi competing with the Central banks. Jonathan Mays, etc. The Central Banks are already using their power of being joined to government (fascism) to bring down cryptocurrencies.
In addition, BRICS being based on 50% gold is indeed a good thing, but is it redeemable in gold? In other words, will any individual be able to exchange the currency into physical gold? It's too early to tell. Moreover, this multi-polar currency will be digital too. Again, we are back to vapor-ware and actual possession. Digital currency is the antithesis of physical possession.
And then there is this. I got rid of my cell phone 6-years ago because I saw this coming. I will not be part of the Beast System. This will be the hill I die on.
Even when the dollar was gold backed, people didn't possess it. They possessed paper gold.
As a metaphor, this is true only if there is trust that the paper denomination is redeemable in gold and can be exchanged to gold. Paper denominations are a receipt for 'something' of value.
Older dollars stated on the paper denomination that it was redeemable in gold. For example, 1928 five dollar bills are special because they were redeemable in gold. They read, “Redeemable In Gold On Demand At The United States Treasury, Or In Gold Or Lawful Money At Any Federal Reserve Bank.” The above phrase is known as the gold clause. This phrase does not make 1928 Federal Reserve note five dollar bills also gold certificates. Gold certificates have a gold seal and were not even printed for the five dollar denomination in 1928. There's more examples than this, but the history of what was printed on dollars tells a story and that is of confiscation of the peoples gold and silver.
Most ordinary people didn't act to redeem the paper currency to gold. They could have, if the chose to do so. They were satisfied with the paper denomination as their receipt for 'something' of value due to the trust in government to make good on their promise.
The Golden Rule: Whoever has the gold makes the Rules. If the individual doesn't physically possess gold and silver, problems of theft will soon after occur. Governments are always very good at doing this. BRICS may give us a set of new problems, but at least it is better than FRBS.
Then there is those pesky details around Jeffrey Epstein and his pedo pals being deeply embedded in the MIT departments that developed good ol' bitcoin.
No one seems to talk about that one. Not just supporting. Embedded.
I'm glad you brought that up. I do recall reading about this. The MIT departments that developed Bitcoin was funded by 'someone' that I don't recall. Was it DARPA? or someone else? There is a hidden hand in all of this crypto-currency. The Epstein connection illustrates the seeming direction.
If you have more info on this, I'd be interested in reading more on the subject.
Can you give me some info about that?
I know Epstein funded the company that's working on the lightning network which is an attempt to centralize Bitcoin. Of course they're going to try to infiltrate it.
WEF and US gov are super anti crypto.
By that logic, is any software NOT vaporware? The thing you must possess is the private key, which you can generate offline and is meant to be kept secure and backed up, hence the word private.
Bitcoin is an open source technology, like Linux or Email. It was always meant to be forked and experimented with. I happen to prefer a different version of Bitcoin called Bitcoin Cash, which forked away from BTC in 2017 due to the BTC dev team refusing to increase Bitcoin's block size, which severely crippled its growth. That is the reason for the explosion of shitcoins because they couldn't build on BTC due to its limited capacity.
I don't know what you are talking about with the CCP, Bitcoin is still alive and well in China. Most of the miners and mining hardware manufacturers are there too.
In Canada the reason people's funds were able to be seized was they were using centralized exchanges and third party intermediaries. Whoever set up the donation address used a custodial wallet and that was their mistake. If they had set up a private multisig wallet, yeah, maybe the government would be able to track it, but they couldn't have seized it.
The Canadian Truckers is more of an argument for digital privacy. If they had used Monero, no one would have had their money stolen, or even heard about it.
Right. And now they have to. They grew accustomed to their monopoly and Bitcoin knocked it off track. Do you recall the Silk Road? It's what alerted most of the feds to the threat that Bitcoin posed, because people were able to trade online anonymously and it scared the shit out of them, to the point they created a whole psyop to twist the message of Bitcoin from "A Swiss bank in everyone's pocket" to "HODL LaMbOs To ThE mOoN bRoOoO!" and its been downhill from there.
You practically answered your own question. This question addresses all others. It takes one electrical surge and 'poof' it's gone. Electrical pulses are a poor substitute for something of value. Even the paper denomination is suppose to be a receipt for 'something' of value is obviously more material than an electrical pulse. Like Mexico's paper denominations in the 1980s that became worthless, at least people who ended up having them can say for posterity that it symbolizes why physical gold and silver are things that always has value. That paper denominations are not anything of value.
This leads me to the question that hasn't been answered. The CBDC in the current form is the same Ponzi scheme as the fractional reserve system. All Ponzi schemes accelerate before they collapse. This is what we are now witnessing. There is no way to remain master over a Ponzi scheme. So, the old one has to be ended and a new one created. Ponzi schemes are inherently illegal. Yet, this is what the fractional reserve banking system is. The reason it survived this long is because governments are enjoined to it and enforce it. Ending the Ponzi scheme with another that is worldwide doesn't solve the inherent characteristics of all Ponzi schemes. That is, a Ponzi scheme always accelerates out of control. Presently, the paper denomination is suppose to be a receipt for 'something' of value. Bretton Woods II removed gold as that 'something' that backed it.
So, the question always comes down to "Who controls the gold?" This is the shell game that's being played. In the current system, there isn't really any gold being played in the shell game.... At least to the plebeian individual that is. Notwithstanding, governments and global elite use it to give backing to the FRBS system. Gold and silver has always had intrinsic value. This is incontrovertible throughout history. Therefore, it is as if it is God's currency. At least BRICS recognizes its monetary system needs to be backed by at least 50% gold. Ghadafi had the same idea for his pan-African currency. The West stole all of Ghadafi's gold. My reservation to BRICS is whether the individual can redeem currency in physical gold? The Golden Rule: Whoever has the gold makes the Rules. If the individual doesn't physically possess gold and silver, problems of theft will soon after occur. Governments are good at doing this.
Well stated. You're explaining some of the reasons I'm suspicious of crypto. All that anyone has to do is kill the electricity somewhere and you have no access to your wealth. Deal-killer. We live in a physical world, our liquid wealth must be physical and tangible.
There's also the question of why we've gone --what, 20 years?-- with crypto and it's still not consistently tradeable into physical assets. Billions in digital coins traded on digital platforms, and they have no more of a use than baseball cards.
I have faith in BRICS. Their gold backed currency will be a stablecoin that ends central bank funny money and fiat manipulation. Plus, Trump's BFF Muhammed bin Salman will be a huge influence in that system. I'm excited.
A very small fraction of dollars have any sort of physical existence.
15 years and It's trivially easy to convert crypto into any physical asset. Or stocks, bonds etc.
Stablecoins are cryptos
It's a good point you make. I recognize BRICS as an answer to ending the fractional reserve systems Ponzi Scheme. All Ponzi schemes accelerate out of control. This is what we are now witnessing with the FRBS. BRICS is there to prevent the Cabal's attempt to create a digital Ponzi Scheme.
As long as currency is not redeemable in gold, there will be problems. The Golden Rule: Whoever has the gold makes the Rules. If the individual doesn't physically possess gold and silver, problems of theft will soon after occur. Governments are good at doing this. BRICS may give us a set of new problems, but at least it is better than FRBS.