Anyone got pics of the actual tanker that we're being told collapsed this thing?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
...my guess is it is under the debris...
The tanker portion?
If the cab caught the bridge than the tanker would be hanging out for sure.
If the tanker portion got caught it seems likely it would have happened as soon as it entered the bridge and would still be hanging out. There’s more I could say here, but that alone should suffice.
I’m thinking this is a white hat op to hinder traffic for some reason. Maybe things really are about to pop off and they want to slow the flow of traffic from New York to DC.?.
I took a picture of it, but it came out just like that 9-11 airplane. /s
I think some black hats are still out there, thinking it's going to end differently.
White hats (or BH) could've done any number of less explosive things to shut down traffic. I mean, it's possible either way, but it doesn't look WH to me.
chris christie is your man.
All he had to do was jog across the bridge.
The tanker, you mean? Chili bean overdose?
Thinking about it, Christie was behind Bridgegate, the last bridge shutdown on the I-95. You could be right.
...it could have caught on the way out...
..or under any cross member beneath the bridge...
That cement is definitely heavy but not heavy enough to completely flatten that tanker.
Also in the last hour the plethora of pics that Yandex and Google had up under “images” are being removed at warp speed!
An hour ago I could scroll and get pic after pic. 5 mins ago I looked and there was barley one page worth.
**on top of that I’ve got a smart guy like you trying to convince me that tanker somehow disappeared under a bridge that it was stuck underneath. Something’s fishy here Ashlanddog😄
Tell me, how does a bridge completely flatten an 18 wheeler tanker if the bridge is already sitting on top of it when it fails? If there is no velocity before impact then there will be a major reduction in the force of the impact.
Hmmmmmm🤔
...occam's razor...
...the truck did not knock down the bridge...
...the ensuing fire did that...
...very much the same thing happened in Russia with that bridge...
...I am not saying that the truck wasn't deliberately crashed and burned ...
Just dawned on me that this could be a two prong white hat op.
Restrict flow of traffic
Force new conversation on the validity of fire being able to melt steel.
By not having a truck you get ppl talking and that will eventually lead to a discussion about fire and steel.
It’s a priming for a bigger conversation/reveal on 9/11
agreed. tankers are aluminum.
gas burns at 536... aluminum melts at 1220 degrees Fahrenheit but losses structural integrity around 600 - and would easily be crushed at those temps (which could be reached during a sustained fire which lasted more than an hour). add rubber tires to the mix.
and as usual: "authorities" say it will take months to repair. (it probably will with Democrats in control.)
the real question is, what does this I95 shut down do for the swamp creatures? Could end up just being another money laundering scheme. Watch who gets the contracts...
...valid observation, nicely stated and framed...
;)
Would CRUSH the container but not the solid steel chassis it sits on.
*There’s also a 3000lbs (avg weight) Diesel engine to contend with.
Regardless, I linked to a pic of the other side of the bridge and there is no truck.
with this pic you can see a truck axel...
but when I click on the link it goes to a video that does not include the pic...
https://files.catbox.moe/jhvuqk.jpg