Fox Sends ‘Cease and Desist’ to Tucker on Eve of Major Trump Defense Episode.
(thenationalpulse.com)
IT'S AFRAID!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
Why would Tucker even still be subject to a 'do not compete' clause when he was terminated? Shouldn't that have rendered any and all contracts null and void? Or did he agree to a payout in exchange to such contracts remaining in effect? Either way, should be interesting seeing this taken to court. See how dystopian it can get if one man recording his own videos and posting them on social media is officially declared competition for a major corporation.
They’re still paying him a salary. He’s just not on the air. He’s still under contract, according to Fox.
Tucker can choose to terminate that contract if Fox tries to silence him and a push becomes a shove in the courts.
Yup. The only remedy Fox has is to actually fire him for breach of contract. They can't shut him up. He doesn't need their money or anything from them really. He's extremely wealthy. For some strange reason they thought they could keep him under contract AND silence him. They can't.
Simply being terminated DOES NOT violate an employment contract or an NDA. An employment contract contains the terms of employment. They usually have a clause like we will pay you [amount] for [task], however we can terminate you for....morals violations....drug usage...not doing your job...bad ethics....harming corporate moral...putting the company in jeopardy, and a lot of other such clauses. The NDA would survive such justified terminations.
Something that would terminate an NDA would be if the company stopped paying the employee. That's a violation of the contract. The NDA would probably NOT survive a contract violation.
The courts will NOT protect a company for making a bad decision. If the company enters a contract that has bad financial consequences, for example, the court will not save the company from a bad decision. A contract is a contract, good or bad.
Fox acted in Bad Faith by not allowing Tucker to maintain his ‘Brand Equity’. Bad Faith violated the covenants of Fair Dealing. Cant do that.
I suppose the argument could be made that Tucker was hired as an "On Air" talent. If Fox now has him being a Desk-Jocky, that's the breach. Faith not required.
i heard as part of his leaving "package" he wasn't allowed to speak about this shit until Dec 2023. i have no sauce, sorry, but if anyone else does, please share.