Can we talk about the fact that Trump retruthed this video that literally tells you that we're watching the systematic fall of the old guard as it shows his first global tour where he took down one side of the cabal pyramid in Saudi Arabia and we have proof it happened...
This is incredible...
(www.bitchute.com)
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
Although your counsel is sound, I really have to wonder why you would refer to #Prussiagate.
When going back to the beginning, the story, which Zoll is telling, he /she references the 1871 treaty between the UK and USA.
https://www.trans-lex.org/502000/_/treaty-between-the-united-states-and-great-britain-1871-/
Zoll's claim is that the Kaiser became the ultimate arbitrator between the UK and USA. However, there is no mentioning of queen Victoria's nephew. I stead, a five-pereon arbitor commission is set up. And indeed, it smacks of the WTO, which has a similar organisation structure.
The book: the kingdom of Iron also levels the accussation of the Prussian State being motaristic and therefor unfit for the world. I cannot help but consider that accusation at best: politically expedient, as Brittain, France, and even the USA, pride themselves in their military tradition and when push came to shove, a total state of war, where all economic resources are dedicated to the war effort existed.
My argument, basically, goes to the point that the premise on which the series rests is spurious, and poorly sourced right from the get go, as the basic premise is easily disproven.
I do admit though, it is an interesting read, and contains many pointers. Political ponerology is quite obvious here.
For these reasons, I would not consider this a trusted source, but just another misguiding narrative to hide one simple fact.
Ask whom you cannot criticize, and you'll have your answer. Every single time! (EST!).
Thank you for the interesting reply fren. I cannot help but correlate your your thoughts on the 1871 treaty and WTO to what I am learning of the legal meaning of a citizen of the USA (Corp). According to Anna Von Reitz the unincorporated part of the usa that controlled the most of the commerce (The South) was destroyed and done away with creating a vacuum. (My memory may be deceiving me as I have only been exposed to what she explained once. I will have to revisit to make sure I fully understand) This vacuum of commercial control was usurped by the crown and the reason we were all indebted to the corporation. It is what stands between us and our unalienable rights Given by God through the constitution. The way to reclaim them is by rejecting citizenship of the USA (Corp) and claiming state national status as this will remove the Corp’s jurisdiction over you. It makes sense to me that the WTO has or would be modeled the same way to enslave the world.
I may be slightly confused about some of what I’ve mentioned, it’s been a firehose of knowledge in the last couple months and I may not have it all fully understood, but this is how it is making sense to me so far. I’m sure my understanding will tighten up over the coming weeks. Thank you, however unknowingly, for making a connection for me.
Anna Von Reitz Granna’s bites video series… https://youtu.be/cGFb0JC1uwk
To learn more about state national status I recommend this crazy guy. His delivery is a bit immature and irreverent but he cites all his statements by the USC, UCC, and Black’s Law 4th edition. He knows his stuff and the quickest easiest way to kill the contracts you have unknowingly made with the USA (Corp). I suggest signing up for his free course. It is HIGHLY enlightening. https://onestupidfuck.com/