True. But stage must be set per Q. I never thought it would be Trump himself who would drop the docs in court. They walked right into the trap. When Trump produces the docs he declassed, the public won't believe it because Orange man bad. Getting interesting.
Fwiw, not all precedents are legal precedents. Some precedents; precedents that imo are just as important, are those based on "custom".
I remember when Trump was Inaugurated, the Deep State feared he'd immediately start trying to prosecute the Deep State criminals. Consequently they began a huge PsyOp campaign to convince normies that doing so would be " unprecedented " and would pose a dangerous threat to our democracy.
This PsyOp was deployed again to justify trying to remove President Trump for suggesting that "Biden's" corruption should be investigated.
PsyOp message: In America, we don't investigate or prosecute our political opponents.
Perhaps:
Trump used himself as the bait (hiding his hooks) thats starting to btfo that Deep State protecting PsyOp narrative that we can't investigate or prosecute them because there's no "precedent" for doing it.
Once President Trumps bait; bait hiding his hooks, was taken, he is in control whether the bait takers are aware of it or not.
What will happen? I don't know. However I'm going to stay tuned to find out while doing all I can to help President Trump.
You can say whatever you want to say, fren. The rule of law does not exclude public officials. "Custom" does not follow the rule of law. The law is the law. Custom is not. So we will see what happens.
President Ulysses S. Grant is the only president ever brought into custody, but his arrest was over a speeding charge which resulted in release and a fine.
what?
What?
he was president from 1869-1873. What was he speeding in, his DeLorean?
Do you find it odd that there has been a lot of commentary on this very obscure incident shrouded in dubious historicity since 2018?
A 2018 segment on NPR's Weekend Edition included audio of prominent Grant scholar John F. Marszalek discussing a summarized version of West's account;[21] Marszalek had previously described the narrative to DCist with the preface "The story goes".[19] Michael S. Rosenwald of the Post, noting also a post on Grant Cottage's website treating West's narrative as factual,[22] concluded in 2018, based on Lanier's comments, that the arrest did occur but that "it's nearly impossible to know if [the Star article] is the whole truth and nothing but the truth";[6] this was echoed by Meilan Solly in Smithsonian in March 2023.[23] In early April 2023, William K. Rashbaum and Kate Christobek of The New York Times also took Lanier's comments as confirmation, but acknowledged the apparent lack of documentation prior to the emergence of West's claim.[4]
Precedent must be set to indict a former president
That's not actually true, it's just been a custom.
True. But stage must be set per Q. I never thought it would be Trump himself who would drop the docs in court. They walked right into the trap. When Trump produces the docs he declassed, the public won't believe it because Orange man bad. Getting interesting.
The rule of law is the rule of law. The rule of law doesn't care about Q or custom. I think this is the point, fren.
I agree w you. But there's the whole two tiered justice thing.
But any president or former president arrested could claim that there is no precedent for the arrest and they would be right. Until now.
Fwiw, not all precedents are legal precedents. Some precedents; precedents that imo are just as important, are those based on "custom".
I remember when Trump was Inaugurated, the Deep State feared he'd immediately start trying to prosecute the Deep State criminals. Consequently they began a huge PsyOp campaign to convince normies that doing so would be " unprecedented " and would pose a dangerous threat to our democracy.
This PsyOp was deployed again to justify trying to remove President Trump for suggesting that "Biden's" corruption should be investigated.
PsyOp message: In America, we don't investigate or prosecute our political opponents.
Perhaps:
Trump used himself as the bait (hiding his hooks) thats starting to btfo that Deep State protecting PsyOp narrative that we can't investigate or prosecute them because there's no "precedent" for doing it.
Once President Trumps bait; bait hiding his hooks, was taken, he is in control whether the bait takers are aware of it or not.
What will happen? I don't know. However I'm going to stay tuned to find out while doing all I can to help President Trump.
You can say whatever you want to say, fren. The rule of law does not exclude public officials. "Custom" does not follow the rule of law. The law is the law. Custom is not. So we will see what happens.
President Ulysses S. Grant is the only president ever brought into custody, but his arrest was over a speeding charge which resulted in release and a fine.
what?
What?
he was president from 1869-1873. What was he speeding in, his DeLorean?
well, you are not wrong
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrests_of_Ulysses_S._Grant
Do you find it odd that there has been a lot of commentary on this very obscure incident shrouded in dubious historicity since 2018?