Judge Cannon Orders Trump Lawyers and attorneys for Walt Nauta, to Obtain Security Clearances
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
WWG1WGA
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
What the fuck is actually going on here?
I think the Judge is going to open some of the files and let the lawyers read what Trump had stored in his home. Then she is going to ask the Prosecution "What the heck is in this file that needs to be so secret?" If the Prosecution shrugs their shoulders then the Judge might dismiss the case.
And possibly to have Trump's team defend themselves, they'll need the proper clearance to deal with the contents of the documents?
the document had been declassified prior to trump leaving office.?
Yeah that's why I'm confused AF over this requirement....
Basically Trump's lawyers can't even be in the room with the documents until they have clearance.
It seems odd to me that she would force them to get clearances before settling the matters of law: does the Espionage Act apply to the documents in question, based on what the prosecution has stated? Was the evidence obtained appropriately (IIRC they flipped one of Trump's attorneys to turn over written notes from client discussions).
Ultimately it's not at all far fetched that they'd need clearances though. It doesn't read well as far as them being able to mount an effective defense dealing with secure documents when they don't even have clearances.
This boils down to do the documents contain national defense information?
The charge is "willfully retaining national defense information." The indictment rests on the basis that these documents are currently actively classified. (Classification is not used in the Espionage Act because this law was writing before the modern classification system, which is WWII era, was set up.)
But basically if you prove classification, you prove national defense information, so they are connected. The government would have had to provide testimony to the grand jury about this.
This already went before a judge. They didn't flip the attorney. The judge agreed with the DOJ that in this case the lawyer should be compelled to testify about his audio notes. This relates to the obstruction charges. He is still Trump's lawyer on another case. So this lawyer will have to testify at trial.