I think it was that the Q team has some folks that know everything to take it all down and this was a last call to see if anybody else out there was willing to flip
Posing a lot of questions with no clear answers is not a method for conveying information. It is a method for showcasing ambiguity. It is putting you on an Easter egg hunt...where you get to pick out your own Easter eggs. For some of you, it is good enough to get you tuned into a shared delusion of conspiracy. But all the conspiracy allegations about the Titanic ultimately crash and burn at the feet of the confirmed facts. Maybe the point of the exercise is not to get invested in fabulous conspiracy theories? Maybe it is enough to see what is in front of us? And that is more real than diving down a rabbit hole? (How do we learn to avoid the paranoid insanity of endless conspiracy and "No coincidence!"?)
It has lately come to my thinking that whenever Q dangles conspiracy bait like this, it is really a test to see if we can do the research to realize that it is just a bogus story. I've done that research, and it is a bogus story. A lot of people here just ran with the fable.
OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush’s wife is great great granddaughter of Isidor Straus, one of those who was opposed to the federal reserve and died on the Titanic
Also on board the sub was the worlds most knowledgeable Titanic researcher and historian. He may have known it want an iceberg that took down the ship and was looking for evidence on this expedition
Yes the story is comms about the FED.
I think it was that the Q team has some folks that know everything to take it all down and this was a last call to see if anybody else out there was willing to flip
This shitty little sub is a comms overload.
Lol Yes sir, seems as such. It's a pretty funny one too.
There are no coincidences.
Were there ever any survivors from the Titanic wreck?
Yes there were survivors. duckduckgo.com for info
Posing a lot of questions with no clear answers is not a method for conveying information. It is a method for showcasing ambiguity. It is putting you on an Easter egg hunt...where you get to pick out your own Easter eggs. For some of you, it is good enough to get you tuned into a shared delusion of conspiracy. But all the conspiracy allegations about the Titanic ultimately crash and burn at the feet of the confirmed facts. Maybe the point of the exercise is not to get invested in fabulous conspiracy theories? Maybe it is enough to see what is in front of us? And that is more real than diving down a rabbit hole? (How do we learn to avoid the paranoid insanity of endless conspiracy and "No coincidence!"?)
It has lately come to my thinking that whenever Q dangles conspiracy bait like this, it is really a test to see if we can do the research to realize that it is just a bogus story. I've done that research, and it is a bogus story. A lot of people here just ran with the fable.
OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush’s wife is great great granddaughter of Isidor Straus, one of those who was opposed to the federal reserve and died on the Titanic
Also on board the sub was the worlds most knowledgeable Titanic researcher and historian. He may have known it want an iceberg that took down the ship and was looking for evidence on this expedition
IF your theory is correct, then Yes, but in a reverse manner, a sort of Justice for the crimes they have committed thing....