White Americans have violence promoted against them at every turn, groups that would rise up and say that that's wrong (not these people, but the people they're pretending to be) are labeled as white supremacists and are not exacerbating the problem
Since when is seeing a criminal’s face considered doxxing them? Background is different that publishing addresses and family and phone numbers. That’s all Public Information. They should be willing to put their identity behind their actions
Sometimes when you go against the regime it's prudent to have some op sec. I bet the guys still in prison from January 6th wish their faces were hidden although I guess everyone has forgotten about them. Also is this post not celebrating the doxxing of people that was a result of forcibly removing their masks, thereby exposing their identities for the purpose of doxxing them? Perhaps your definition is more restrictive than mine. It may have worked out in the case but I'm not talking about this case I was asking a broader question.
More importantly, do you think it would have been wrong for the Jan 6ers currently imprisoned to have hidden their faces? Why or why not?
Fren, I see your point - I truly do. I think of the less famous John 3 passage (we all know 3:16 by heart) but John 3:19-21 explains my position. Not to simply thump the Bible, but I find that passage Extremely enlightening. In summation : those who perpetrate evil hate the light and do not come into the light lest they be exposed, but he who does the truth comes to the light, that his deeds may be Clearly Seen and that those deeds were done before the Lord. God bless and GodsPede
This is how it’s done.
Demask, photo, ID, and publish background results.
The only way to stop this nonsense.
Not if police around of course, considering forcibly removing clothing/masks/hijabs/whatever is considered assault.
Could be considered self-defense to identify who is infiltrating your group without invitation.
It’s worth it
So what if they were real white nationalists? Should they be doxxed because you disagree with them?
White Americans have violence promoted against them at every turn, groups that would rise up and say that that's wrong (not these people, but the people they're pretending to be) are labeled as white supremacists and are not exacerbating the problem
You did not answer my question
Since when is seeing a criminal’s face considered doxxing them? Background is different that publishing addresses and family and phone numbers. That’s all Public Information. They should be willing to put their identity behind their actions
Sometimes when you go against the regime it's prudent to have some op sec. I bet the guys still in prison from January 6th wish their faces were hidden although I guess everyone has forgotten about them. Also is this post not celebrating the doxxing of people that was a result of forcibly removing their masks, thereby exposing their identities for the purpose of doxxing them? Perhaps your definition is more restrictive than mine. It may have worked out in the case but I'm not talking about this case I was asking a broader question.
More importantly, do you think it would have been wrong for the Jan 6ers currently imprisoned to have hidden their faces? Why or why not?
Fren, I see your point - I truly do. I think of the less famous John 3 passage (we all know 3:16 by heart) but John 3:19-21 explains my position. Not to simply thump the Bible, but I find that passage Extremely enlightening. In summation : those who perpetrate evil hate the light and do not come into the light lest they be exposed, but he who does the truth comes to the light, that his deeds may be Clearly Seen and that those deeds were done before the Lord. God bless and GodsPede