I'm sure he's NOT referring to the Jesuit priest who took pictures of everybody aboard the Titanic and coincidentally exited the ship mid trip, right before it left Ireland to launch itself into an iceberg.
The young Jesuit photographed the Titanic leaving port for the last time as it left Queenstown, in County Cork, for New York. He could have been onboard: An American couple he befriended on the ship offered to fund the final leg of the journey to New York.
From the Titanic, he sent a telegram to his provincial in Dublin to request permission. However, a frosty telegram awaited him in Queenstown: “Get off that ship.”
When news of the Titanic’s disastrous fate reached Fr. Browne, he folded the telegram and put it into his wallet and kept it there for the rest of his life. He later said it was the only time holy obedience had saved a life.
There are several books on the subject and a very good debunking page that takes all the conspiracy points to a confrontation with reality. To emulate the treatment I have received here previously, go do your own research. (Hint: There was no ship swap. The serial numbers on the propellers are identification. Etc., etc.)
The serial numbers of a propeller (something that literally can be unbolted even though its size makes it difficult) is better evidence than pictures of the differences between the window layout on each which is then compared to the pictures of the ship at the bottom of the ocean?
Ask yourself how the serial numbers get added to a propeller. In my pleasure boat experience, they are stamped into the brass/bronze. It would seem trivial to stamp a different or even additional serial number onto a propeller and use its existence as “proof”. Changing out the window arrangement would be much more difficult. No?
They were either cast with the propeller or engraved. You can't "unbolt" the propellers except in a shipyard, which is a big and costly operation, impossible to conceal, and both it and the Olympic would have had to be present (and out of service) simultaneously. Never happened. The propellers on the Titanic are those on the Titanic. The Titanic is the Titanic, based on detail differences in the superstructure. And there is no evidence that the Olympic was other than what it is.
The only relevant question is whether there is any EVIDENCE of a substitution. Speculative "What ifs?" do not count as evidence.
And what if the Titanic hadn't sunk and the key figures were rescued alive. Then what? Don't you see that you are entertaining a conspiracy for which absolutely everything would have had to work perfectly in order to attain the objective? After too many improbabilities, when does it become improbable?
What kind of "factual evidence" do you refer to? Wikipedia?
I'm sure he's NOT referring to the Jesuit priest who took pictures of everybody aboard the Titanic and coincidentally exited the ship mid trip, right before it left Ireland to launch itself into an iceberg.
https://catholicherald.org/news/nation-and-world/jesuit-seminarian-took-photographs-of-titanics-infamous-voyage/
Archived link - https://archive.ph/N6z7D
What did the Jesuit provincial know?
There are several books on the subject and a very good debunking page that takes all the conspiracy points to a confrontation with reality. To emulate the treatment I have received here previously, go do your own research. (Hint: There was no ship swap. The serial numbers on the propellers are identification. Etc., etc.)
The serial numbers of a propeller (something that literally can be unbolted even though its size makes it difficult) is better evidence than pictures of the differences between the window layout on each which is then compared to the pictures of the ship at the bottom of the ocean?
Ask yourself how the serial numbers get added to a propeller. In my pleasure boat experience, they are stamped into the brass/bronze. It would seem trivial to stamp a different or even additional serial number onto a propeller and use its existence as “proof”. Changing out the window arrangement would be much more difficult. No?
They were either cast with the propeller or engraved. You can't "unbolt" the propellers except in a shipyard, which is a big and costly operation, impossible to conceal, and both it and the Olympic would have had to be present (and out of service) simultaneously. Never happened. The propellers on the Titanic are those on the Titanic. The Titanic is the Titanic, based on detail differences in the superstructure. And there is no evidence that the Olympic was other than what it is.
The only relevant question is whether there is any EVIDENCE of a substitution. Speculative "What ifs?" do not count as evidence.
And what if the Titanic hadn't sunk and the key figures were rescued alive. Then what? Don't you see that you are entertaining a conspiracy for which absolutely everything would have had to work perfectly in order to attain the objective? After too many improbabilities, when does it become improbable?