The Guardian seems to have forgotten about their very own 2018 report detailing rampant child sex trafficking in Colombia.
Today they labeled Sound of Freedom, which highlights a mission to rescue sex-trafficked children in Colombia, a “QAnon-adjacent” “paranoid new movie”.
Absolute clowns.🤡
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤢 Guardians of the Pedophile 🤮
I’ve noticed multiple articles with the “Qanon adjacent” phrase. Sort of like “baseless unfounded” conspiracy theory.
The Illuminati must have a special Creative Writing division, devoted to coming up with new "official-sounding" catchphrases to scare the normies.
Lol...They're are fucking idiots to a certain extent...
Laughing so hard right now I think I hurt the front of my back 🤪😁
or to pacify them..
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/nov/24/false-memories-abuse-convict-innocent
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/nov/18/satanic-child-abuse-false-memories-scotland
Your statement is a danger to our democracy
It's their new catch phrase. After I commented about the whole "what's the big deal if they want to scan your face..." issue on twit, saying that it was an ill-informed idea...they proceeded to tell me that 'qanon' (they never learn!) is an ill-informed idea, I replied "no sh!t since it doesn't exist!" Which dropped their guard, they then replied "well your profile sure has a lot of q adjacent posts within two swipes down." Which led me to say "yeah, I didn't expect you'd get it. Don't worry, I don't care at all what you think. The more you know!💫"
I may have said something about getting another booster since it doesn't seem to be working. And, Q says 🖕. 😁
https://twitter.com/patri0tcontr0l/status/1677156450777415681?s=46&t=yH_YwZotlm6m-dfwNvYx3Q
The couple of dozen readers they have left will be getting very confused
Taking advantage of the 2 minute attention span of so many.
Who's giving the press the order to attack in unison? Well, we know of course.
https://jezebel.com/sound-of-freedom-review-1850596160
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2023/jul/06/sound-of-freedom-movie-qanon-jim-caviezel
https://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/ted-cruz-qanon-jim-caviezel-18183126.php
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/jim-caviezel-sound-of-freedom-qanon/
https://aiptcomics.com/2023/07/07/sound-of-freedom-qanon-caviezel/
https://www.mediamatters.org/qanon-conspiracy-theory/jim-caviezel-pushes-qanon-bizarre-media-blitz-new-anti-trafficking-movie
Weird, considering just a few years ago they were all pretending to care about the issue. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2018/dec/23/child-sex-trafficking-rife-colombia-cartagena
https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/376500-porn-consumption-is-contributing-to-child-sex-trafficking-epidemic/
https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/14/perspectives/human-trafficking-fight/index.html
https://time.com/longform/windie-jo-lazenko-sex-trafficking-survivor/
https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2017/01/10/spotlight-oaklands-child-sex-trafficking-epidemic/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ewelinaochab/2018/07/26/human-trafficking-is-a-pandemic-of-the-21st-century/?sh=5a4a6ca56195
Don't know what Qanon is ... maybe ask them to clarify?
If you mean people who have researched & confirmed Q's coms, then yes. We are literally EVERYWHERE...so "adjacent" is correct.
How disgusting. Well now we know where the regime media mouthpieces stand, they are pro-pedophile. I will treat them accordingly.
What a hill to die on. Shielding child sex traffickers. Wow.