I don't know the exact date of the raid, but I believe the girl would probably be around 20 years old now, and the boy would probably be in his teens. Most likely their faces will be blurred, but who knows if this is a war to put a face to the victims of child trafficking.
It will be sickening although interesting to see how the MSM attacks these individuals if and when they begin to speak out.
u/#q2737
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dhs-official-border-security-bill-does-not-contain-amnesty-poison-pills
It is literally an article about child sex trafficking
That ‘amnesty’ claim is based on section 224 of the budget -- which appears, on first glance, to block the deportation of many people who are illegally in the U.S.
Could map refer to Minor Attracted Person? Double meaning?? Why the fuck would he be with our beloved President who we have spent years following every step he took and analyzed everything? But the one thing we really fucking hate is the one thing he will have tricked us on?
https://rumble.com/v2cqfri-alpha-punisher-when-samatha-guthrie-was-seething-at-the-fact-trump-wouldnt-.html
22 seconds mark I know nothing about QANON - didn't Jim Caviezel just say this there is no QANON
32 seconds mark what I do know is they are very much AGAINST PEDOPHILIA, they fight it very hard
u/#q224
I never considered that before. The map is in front of you. The map = Minor Attracted Person
News unlocks map?
What 22 seconds are you talking about?
Jim Caviezel said… there is Q, and there are Anons, but No QAnon. So you’re right, he did say there is no QAnon, but he did credit the difference between the two.
Sorry I meant 22 second mark.
Yes you are correct. We were also told exactly what JC said by Q. I guess I mean we see it right here with Trump at the 22 mark. And we are also talking about many years ago this interview. Notice how this bitch just doesn't ask to disavow Q, but to disavow Qanon. And he answers back I know nothing about it. If there is Q and Anons, but there is no QAnon how could he possibly know about it? He just heard its people who hate pedophiles...
👍
Wow Anon - good smithing.
Sorry. I'm confused what you mean.
My apologies, I am referring to the attacks, maybe I shouldnt say attacks but can't really find another term, we have seen even on here and specially with Twitter 'Q" influencers. 100% we need to verify and question everything. But if Q influencers AND the msm is trying to discredit them, but they are with DT for a screening next week, and Ballard was with Trump last night, are we not missing something? Hollywood just went on strike is that coincidence? How many times did Q tell us 'you have more than you know'? If we truly believe in Q, but now in a way, and kind of indirectly no doubt, we don't believe in 45? Does that make sense?
For the record, I never have really listened to TimCast. And know very little about him, besides his Twitter posts and the fact that many people in the Q community have tried to discredit him along with the media right? My point is can we collect our logic we all have acquired in these crazy 6 years and perhaps be the ones who discredit or credit some of these "influencers"? How? I have no idea, maybe someone does. If Ballard does this on TimCast, and Ballard is with Trump, does this not automatically credit TimCast? I am thinking out loud here
Because people will need someone and/or more than 1 on a MIC and on video, because they will not sit there and read Q drops. They are not wired like we are. Specially when shit really hits the fan. I take 'we are the plan' to heart and truly believe so, and again I am just thinking out loud here while i am typing
They use a relatively normie platform to get the message out there. Why would Trump be on Twitter otherwise?