Once you dig into the details, which few seem to be interested in doing, you'll begin to see that the western allopathic medical system, and by extension, "germ theory" is virtually all lies. I share this article for those of you who wish to learn for yourselves instead of taking our "pseudo-experts" word for it.
This is a very thorough article, and I tried to wade through it carefully. I get the author's conclusion, although, I felt it was missing the same summaries from other "terrain theory" articles/videos...what is the cause(s) of illness, if not germs/viruses?
Thanks for looking into it for yourself and not believing the pseudo-experts. Self-empowerment!
All dis-ease is caused by an unexpected and isolating life situation that catches you off guard. Your psyche (subconscious mind / soul / autonomic nervous system) is in full charge of every operation of your body - from breathing, to pumping blood, beating your heart, digesting your food, destroying old cells, creating new cells, etc. Your psyche does it all.
Likewise, when you experience a conflicting situation in life, your psyche responds to this as well and tries to assist you as best it can, often translating your figurative thoughts literally.
I've written extensively here about all the major germs/boogeyman-viruses. It takes some time to absorb the explanation for each one. I wish I could just say, it's not viruses, it's "Schmiruses"!! Unfortunately, it's not that simple.
However, when it comes to the dis-eases we have been led to BELIEVE, that we "catch and pass" to each other, like flus, colds, covid, pneumonia, etc., the underlying cause of all of these revolves around "fear". When you are worried, concerned, scared about "catching a bug", your psyche registers this fear and you instinctively begin to breathe more shallowly. You can think of a predator and prey. When the prey is scared, its instinct is to freeze and become undetectable by the prey. This primitive instinct still operates in humans as well as the animal kingdom.
This shallow breathing is compensated for by your psyche by temporarily widening your bronchial or laryngeal passages to enable you to uptake more oxygen while you are scared/worried. You are not "sick" during this time. When you get over your worry, your psyche reverses the process and rebuilds the tissue that it temporarily removed. And it is this RESTORATION process that we have all been taught to BELIEVE is "bad". During the restoration, the psyche generates, not "catches", its own bacterial forms to assist with the tissue rebuild, along with generating inflammation, excess fluid and higher body temperature in order to complete the process. And this is what we've been brainwashed into calling DIS-EASE, subsequently running to the doctors in hopes they can make it all go away as fast as possible.
It takes a lot of space to explain some of the other boogeyman-viruses but hopefully that gives you a sense of things. Fear in the lungs, anger in the abdominal region, self-devaluation in the bones and muscles, separation for the skin as some generalities.
Hope that helps you better understand. The "Terrain Theorists" are flailing in the dark unfortunately. They can't prove a causal relationship between any food, toxin, 5G signal, pesticide of anything else. They're lost in the "multi-factorial" explanation without any proof. What I'm sharing suggests all dis-ease is "monocausal" and results from the unexpected life event that throws us out of our normal rhythms.
Thank you for taking the time to explain your thoughts on this. The psychosomatic angle can perhaps explain why people experience similar symptoms as others, aided by fear, but it doesn't explain illness where there is no knowledge of others experiencing symptoms.
A lot of theories look to small-scale outbreaks from hundreds of years ago as explanation, but there don't seem to be any modern equivalents. The case about the sailors on a ship experiencing the same illness as natives on shore (was it Cuba?), when there was no landing party, comes to mind. I think we can say that a lot of illnesses from earlier periods were misdiagnosed, or similar agents attributed to different cases just because they occurred at the same time.
Just last week I watched a video by the red-haired doctor from New Zealand (forget her name at the moment) discussing Lyme disease. As this article did, she exposed how frail the evidence is for a tick-borne illness, but didn't offer an alternative explanation. Why is it, then, that people who are bit by deer ticks, and also get the "bull's eye" rash, get similar symptoms which respond to the same treatment? She also didn't mention that the facility on Plum Island (just across the sound from Lyme, CT) was researching using ticks as a vector for biological agents.
All these diseases attributed to mosquitos and ticks, depend upon the parasites biting a host of a disease first, infecting themselves, then passing along the infection to a second victim. I think it's safe to say that these smaller parasites (insects or arachnidae) very rarely feed twice as would be required. They either feed once successfully and lay eggs, or they fail to find a host in the time required, and die. They are born sterile, so how do "so many" become vectors for a unique disease?
I agree with the conclusions about, for instance, the 1918 Spanish flu was actually bacterial pneumonia/meningitis, and polio is actually a spectrum of neurological symptoms from pesticide exposure, but I've never come across a good, solid discussion of actual disease agents attributed to more common afflictions.
I think we can say that a lot of illnesses from earlier periods were misdiagnosed
Agreed on this! I'd say most were, right up until this very day I might add. Cooties-1984 as the most obvious exemplar!
Just last week I watched a video by the red-haired doctor from New Zealand (forget her name at the moment) discussing Lyme disease
Dr. Sam Bailey - wonderful on boogyeman-viruses, but she's lost in "terrain theory" nonsense.
but didn't offer an alternative explanation
Because she can't offer any explanations as a terrain theory advocate. But I will. Lyme is primarily a self-devaluation conflict. And you'll notice, middle-aged women are most prone to it, as societal "standards" are devastating to their sense of worth. Whenever there's a rash involved, this is always a separate conflict, namely a separation conflict.
Why is it, then, that people who are bit by deer ticks, and also get the "bull's eye" rash, get similar symptoms which respond to the same treatment?
Any such tick bite can produce a standard histamine response. This has absolutely nothing to do with "lyme dis-ease" however, which is a made up thing, just like malaria, just like all "auto-immune" disorders as well. It's all lies. There's no such thing as an "immune system", and our bodies are so remarkably intelligent that suggesting they "mutate" or "attack themselves" is literally the height of absurdity. We're awash in an endless amount of lies!
Besides, well over 90% of people who think they have "lyme dis-ease" never report the so-callled "tell tale" tick bite to begin with.
She also didn't mention that the facility on Plum Island (just across the sound from Lyme, CT) was researching using ticks as a vector for biological agents.
Yep, this is the classic "conspiracy theory" psyop for the truther community. They always run one for the normies and one for the truthers. It's all bunk.
Have you been diagnosed with lyme?
They are born sterile, so how do "so many" become vectors for a unique disease?
They don't. The entire parasite story is also a lie. Shocker, eh? Parasites form symbiotic relationships with their hosts. There is something "in it" for both of them. The many gut parasites perform a valuable service, removing toxic waste that the person is unable to eliminate due to other conflicts they're suffering.
I agree with the conclusions about, for instance, the 1918 Spanish flu was actually bacterial pneumonia/meningitis
I used to. Now I understand it fully. There were no "bacterial attacks" as we have been led to believe. This has never been shown to be true. Koch's Postulates have never been satisfied. Something else happened. I wrote all about it here: https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZqU7uaXt/unleashed-special-editionisland-/
and polio is actually a spectrum of neurological symptoms from pesticide exposure, but I've never come across a good, solid discussion of actual disease agents attributed to more common afflictions.
I too have heard the story of polio being caused by lead-arsenate and DDT. They may have contributed. I cannot dispute it because no actual proof has been presented. it's a theory. I've also heard the polio jabs themselves contributed to the issues. That too may be possible. We've never seen any definitive proof on either, and probably never will.
There is another explanation though. Motor conflicts are caused by severe self-devaluations. Think MS, ALS, parkinson's, osteoperosis, myalgia, neuropathy and a whole host of others. All eventually lead to paralysis. Could the children of the 1940s and 1950s been so frightened by parents, doctors, teachers, etc. that they began to fear they may have "contracted polio"? Certainly this is possible. And certainly, this did happen. Perhaps not for all cases, but some.
Another great trick of the conventional medical establishment is that they can and often do change the names of their diagnosis to give the appearance that a certain "viral dis-ease" has been eradicated. You don't have to look to far to see how blatantly they did this with almost zero cases of flu registering in 2020 and 2021. They clearly did this with polio too.
Dis-eases like ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease or motor neuron disease), Multiple Sclerosis, or Guillain-Barré syndrome are all clinically indistinguishable from "polio".
Once you learn their tricks, you can start to see through the lies. Good on you for doing your own research, asking questions, and not blindly believing the pseudo-experts. Our doctors have all been profoundly miseducated. They know not what they do or say.
When Q said "those you trust the most....", he wasn't kidding.
Thank you again for your lengthy analysis! You've certainly spent a lot of time thinking this all through.
I've been suffering from a broad-spectrum autoimmune condition for about fifteen years. It was triggered by long-term exposure to formaldehyde fumes coming from a new sofa we purchased. It took years for me to figure it out, mostly because we travel from home so infrequently. But on those occasions when we did, I began to feel better, and then I began learning about toxic environmental fumes in the home, etc. I realized there was an odor coming from the sofa after my body heat warmed it, so I purchased a test kit, which confirmed that the amount of formaldehyde was extremely high.
But even after stripping the sofa to the frame and rebuilding it with safe materials, the damage was done. The worst of the symptoms is a chronic "migraine" (though technically not a migraine) as a result of inflammation inside my skull. I know this because I can feel it, as do others who suffer from this type of specific inflammation. Everyone describes it the same way. It does respond to treatments geared towards migraine.
Having lived with this for a number of years, I can feel what's happening inside me preceding an attack. I can feel the histamines/cytokines going berserk after being exposed to certain triggers. Some of the symptoms mimic lupus, although I test negative for that. As a matter of fact, one of the triggers is being studied here in Florida, and is associated with red tide.
I never expected this condition, never knew about it, and am not a fearful person by nature. After I discovered it, I found out about the class-action lawsuits by airline stewardesses exposed to formaldehyde via their permanent-press uniforms, and the class-action lawsuit against Lumber Liquidators for their laminated flooring, among others.
More recently, I seem to have picked up Grover's Disease, diagnosed by my dermatologist. It's an odd, basically untreatable chronic rash. However, after I had it a few months, and went gluten-free (after confirmation of another problem) the rash went away almost instantaneously for a few months, then returned. (This made me suspect that the rash was connected to the gluten. Now, I suspect that it is autoimmune in origin and an outgrowth of the original autoimmune condition, although this is apparently disputed by researchers.) Again, I had no knowledge of this condition, and didn't have a "name" associated with it until after having it for 5-6 years.
All this gives me perhaps a unique insight into at least the autoimmune angle of things. Two of the medications in my arsenal are immunomodulators...and they work in precisely the manner you would expect them to. I know when I need to use them, and for how long. (It's actually an off-label use for both of them.) But I still haven't been able to "pop the cork" off my understanding of the truth between germ vs. terrain theory. Both sides of both arguments just don't seem to ring true, and I've tried to read and listen to as much as I can that seems credible.
Most of these can be chalked up to either self-devaluation or separation conflicts, but without more specifics, I can't offer much more.
The worst of the symptoms is a chronic "migraine" (though technically not a migraine) as a result of inflammation inside my skull.
I know many people who suffer from migraines. They arise during the epi-crisis of the healing state. If they are chronic, then you can liken the cause to an "allergy" of sorts, where something in your environment triggers the memory of your psyche to an event in your past, directly preceding your migraines. Typically these originally arise as the result of a powerless or frontal fear conflict. The former is self-explanatory but the frontal fear has to do with the fear of something "out ahead of you", "in the future". In short, something triggers your memory and you re-start the dis-ease process each time. Discovering and resolving your original conflict would bring an end to them.
I'm all too familiar with all the terrain theory stories of fumes, molds, household toxins, food toxins, etc. etc. While it's all quite intriguing, it always lacks specificity in the end. Why was only one person in the household effected by the fume/toxins/mold but not everybody? There's no sensible answer to this question. The same goes for alleged boogeymen-viruses. The "why doesn't everybody" question can never be satisfactorily answered in either of these theories.
More recently, I seem to have picked up Grover's Disease, diagnosed by my dermatologist.
All skin rashes of the epidermis are the result of a separation conflict. Either due to you not wanting to be separated from someone, or wanting to be separated from someone. When you are feeling the not or wanted separation, your psyche desensitizes your epidermis nerve endings in the regions that you associate with being close to this person. Grover's affects the trunk area, so this is likely related to you missing somebody you hugged often. The psyche does this so that when something or someone touches your trunk skin area, you don't feel it and are not reminded of your separation. When you have resolved the conflict in your mind, the psyche restores the nerve endings in the epidermis and this results in rashes, bumps, pox, etc. If you have recurring bouts and the condition is chronic, this means that you are reminded of this person from time to time.
autoimmune condition
Once again, our modality rejects all notions of these. We obviously acknowledge the symptoms and pain, just not the irrational theory that your body "attacks itself". Skin rashes like psoriasis, dermatitis, hives, measles, rubella, chicken pox, etc. are all a result of the separation conflict. The differences between the diagnosis are a question of intensity, duration and which stage of the dis-ease process you are in, for example, psoriasis is actually the result of two active separation conflicts. Conditions like eczema, shingles and melanoma afflict the deeper skin layer, the dermis, and are a result of an attack or feeling soiled/dirtied/sullied conflict. Your psyche attempts to strengthen your protection from the outside by hardening the deeper layer of the skin.
Both sides of both arguments just don't seem to ring true, and I've tried to read and listen to as much as I can that seems credible.
Your gut is correct. Neither are true.
Tissue samples were saved from 1918, and this helped unravel how the disease originated:
Did you read my piece on the Spanish Flu? I agree that pneumonia played a big role, but the question is how and why? It's not "contagious, so something else must have been going on. I explain it all in detail in the linked thread.
It's discussions like this that really help us to dig deeper...
if you're ready to dig deeper, here's your next adventure. It will take you some time to learn, but if you are motivated, you'll pick it up quickly enough. I like to start people on this "Search A-Z" page where you can look up some 500 or so common dis-eases and start to get a sense of things. https://learninggnm.com/SBS/documents/sbs_index.html#M
Unfortunately, I can't rectify what you describe with my own personal experience, but I don't doubt that it could be relevant with others. Thanks again for sharing a bit of your thoughts!
It requires a dedicated analysis and some deeper understanding of what mainstream medicine calls "allergies". We call these "unconscious associations".
Let's take the example of a young boy named Billy who becomes allergic to cats at age 8 for instance. Billy's family does not own a cat. One day Billy is over at his friend Mikey's house playing, and Mikey's family has a cat. They're a bit too rambunctious this one day and accidentally break an expensive vase in the living room. Mikey's mother enters the scene and begins to scream at both boys and scold them equally, perhaps even smacks around her son a bit. Billy has never seen anything like this. His parents do not behave in this way. He is shocked by the whole situation. Make sense?
Now, during the scolding event, while he is shocked, his psyche (subconscious mind) is recording all information it can take in. The sights, sounds, tastes, smells, etc. All this information gets recorded as "potentially dangerous" to his psyche. One such smell which is outside his normal experience is that of cat dander.
Now, every time Billy gets near a cat, his psyche recalls the shocking event at Mikey's house, and doing its best to protect Billy from another similar shock, it begins to make his eyes water and get bloodshot, his nose gets runny, he starts sneezing, etc. His psyche has associated cat dander with another potential crisis. And the leading medical experts of the world tell Billy he's got a "cat allergy".
Fast forward now and Billy is 50 years old. I tell Billy why he is allergic to cats. I have no idea what the trigger was, and he almost certainly won't make the connection right off the bat either. He's going to have to think back to when he first noticed he was allergic to cats. That part of the equation might be easy for him. However, the next part is typically not so easy. He then has to think back to the weeks/months prior to him first noticing he was allergic to cats and then recall this event at Mikey's house that he's all but forgotten about. And he naturally does not make any connection between it and the fact that they had a cat. And in some cases, if the event was highly traumatic to him, his psyche has buried his memory of the event until such time that it deems him ready and capable of finally processing it.
I lived in Austin, TX for 20 years. 25% of people that move to Austin are said to become allergic to the cedar pollen, which is unique to central Texas, within 5 years of moving there. 33% after 10 years. What's going on? You would think the instant you moved there, or at most 8 months from moving there in April, you would be "allergic". Why does it take so long?
Cedar pollen season lasts for about 4 months each year (Dec - March). If a person has a conflicting event during these 4 months, their psyche records the thick pollen as a potential danger, and now they're "allergic" to it. Like clockwork. It's the same story. And the same thing works with foods. If you're eating or have just eaten a certain food and get caught up in an unexpected conflicting situation, you're now allergic to the dairy, gluten, chocolate, pizza, etc. you were eating at the time.
The short-term resolution is to discover your trigger - a sight, sound, taste, smell and avoid it as best you can. The long-term resolution is to do the work as mentioned above. Think back to your first experience with the chronic dis-ease or "allergy". Then start evaluating unexpected negative events in your life in the weeks/months preceding it. For those who do this work, with some prompting of their psyche/soul, the answer will eventually pop into their head.
The longer ago that the event happened, the more likely the resolution will be fairly simple to achieve. In Billy's case, he's no longer friends with Mikey and he's never going to be playing at his house again. The conflict is resolved on the spot and he can consciously let his psyche know to no longer consider cats to be a danger. His "allergy" or chronic dis-ease disappears in that instant.
So this is the process for how you uncover and resolve chronic issues. In your case, skin is related to a separation conflict as I mentioned above. Something in your environment, or on TV, or in a book, or whatever, reminds you of being separated from someone you care about and this re-triggers the skin response on your trunk. And likewise with the migraine. You are reminded from time to time of an event where you lost something, felt powerless, were worried about something coming up in the future, etc.
My teacher told the story of how he would get a migraine every weekend for almost 5 years. His job required that he was on the road giving seminars Monday through Friday. But when he got home, because he drove so much, he didn't want to drive on the weekend. He went through dozens of possible triggers all through this period until he finally remembered that he had gotten into an accident a few months prior to his migraines beginning. While he was largely uninjured, he was pinned into his seat for a few hours before he could be removed. And it was during this time that he felt "powerless". And there was his conflict. Each Monday he was triggered back into conflict when he started the car. During the week he was fine because he remained conflict active. When he got home each Friday he resolved his conflict and typically on Saturday night, his migraine would kick in.
All this to say, even when you this material, it's not that simple to discover the trigger nor the event. It takes some earnest effort for most people.
You seem like a reasonable person, and as such, you must admit that what I've shared does make some sense, at least in relation to what the establishment and terrain people have to say. They don't have any explanation for why one person is allergic, or has an "auto-immune" issue, or a chronic issue, etc. while other people don't react in the same way. They've simply got no explanations on offer. Not to the cause, and therefore not for any cures.
More often than not, we naturally "cure ourselves", sometimes quite accidentally and unconsciously. And if we were taking supplementX or herbY or vitaminD at the time, we assume that it worked for us. There are a bazillion stories out there from people swearing therapy/supplement/herb/vitamin X cured their cancer, resolved their auto-immune disorder, fixed thier allegy, etc. They're a dime a dozen. FWIW, the placebo effect is very real too. So if you found something you think works for you, by all means, stick with it!
Anyway, good luck with your issues and thanks for your questions.
Hey u/Morpheus11 have you ever given any thought to the role of bacteria in dental health? The dentist is always going on about how they are eating away at my teeth. That sound reasonable on the service, but why would bacteria eat health bone? Why don't they eat away my jaw or skull for example?
Bacteria are never attacking or harmful to us. Our body actually creates bacteria, just like it creates cells/tissue. We don't "catch" them from "out there". We're probably 10-years away from this becoming common knowledge however.
The idea that bacteria "cause dis-ease" is a HALF-TRUTH that will difficult to unwind, as so many other lies will be too.
It's true that when bacteria become active in our body, that we then "feel sick", and thus you could say it's the bacteria making us sick. That's the half that's true. But what's happening is the bacteria are generated by the body to either repair or restore tissue that has been altered by our psyche (or autonomic nervous system) to deal with a perceived negative life situation. Depending on the germ layer, the psyche adds tissue (tumors/cancers) in the case of the oldest endoderm (organs and glands) in order to improve its function, or removes tissue during the conflict to help widen or eventually strengthen tissue of the ectoderm. Both the enamel and dentin are ectodermal.
You are likely going in and out of what we call a "bite conflict", very primal and instinctual in nature. This falls into the "self-devaluation" category of conflicts. The analogy to the canine world works quite nicely. When a dog is unhappy about something, they bear their front teeth to show their displeasure. Thus, the conflict here is that you wish to show somebody your displeasure, like say your spouse, boss, co-worker, child, parent, etc., but societal rules dictate you not do this to maintain the peace. Your dental issues would be in your top/front teeth if this is the case.
The next level is if you feel like you want to "snap at" your foe, opponent, person causing you irritation to teach them to stop doing/saying/acting as they are. Again, what's stopping you from expressing yourself are our artificial cultural rules of behavior. On one hand, you may be much stronger and in a superior position to this person and society reprimands us for "picking on somebody weaker than you". On the other hand, you may also feel you are in the position of weakness and feel like you could lose something should you "snap back" at this person - say a boss or a spouse. This type of conflict expresses in the incisors region, the teeth where a dog would "snap at" its opponent, but not really harm it, but rather send a stern message.
The strongest conflict is with the molars, where you instinctively want to "crush" your opponent, "grind them up" once and for all so to speak, to put an end to their unsavory behavior toward you.
In all cases, what's happening is, when you hold back your instinct, whichever it is, you're fundamentally saying "I CAN'T bare, bite, snap, crush" my opponent because......such and such a reason.
Make sense so far?
Now, the key to understanding all of this is how your psyche responds. It only registers the "I CAN'T BITE" part of the equation. It doesn't understand our societal and cultural rules and norms. It's only concerned with your survival. And when it hears I CAN'T, it concludes that you've decided you can't because your, in this case, teeth are too weak.
You can apply this same logic to all muscles, bones, connective tissue, etc. and the zillions of afflictions that people have with them. This is, by far, the largest category of conflicts people suffer -> SELF-DEVALUATION.
If you're with me thus far, here's what happens next. The process employed by the psyche is basically identical to lifting weights to make your muscles stronger, or even breaking a bone. In both cases, when the muscles are deliberately torn apart, or the bone is accidentally broken, your psyche always responds by building the muscle or bone stronger so as to help you survive a similar experience in the future.
And this is what's happening with your teeth. Your psyche hears I CAN"T BITE, and goes to work with breaking down your dentin or enamel in order to build it back stronger so that you will feel like you can bite when it completes the process.
This self-devaluation category is the hardest for people to understand because you don't see the benefit of it until the whole conflict and healing process is completed.
So it's likely that you go in and out of your bite conflict, with whomever it is associated with. The bacteria enter the mix AFTER you have resolved your conflict and they go about building stronger dentin/enamel for you. If there are no bacteria but increasing pain and cavities, your bite conflict is active and not yet resolved.
The whole sugar, brushing, flossing story is complete nonsense. I brush maybe once a week, never floss, and eat probably 10x the amount of sugar anybody I know my age, and haven't been to a dentist in over 20 years - no cavities, no dental issues. I realize you won't likely come around to the no brushing/flossing idea any time soon. But I'd recommend you consider it in the short term if you're experiencing pain in your teeth. You're scrubbing away the bacteria that are trying to make your teeth stronger/better. After they pain goes away, you can resume your brushing routine.
The hardest part of course, is figuring out who your foe is, and if you can find a way to let them know your displeasure with this person without suffering a greater loss, like losing a job. Most people I've worked with that have bite conflicts have them with their boss or a co-worker. A few with their spouses.
A little creative thinking can help you come up with a reasonable strategy to work out your issue. Sometimes, just a brief moment of tempered brutal honesty is all it takes -> "Hey boss, I don't like the way you treat me under these circumstances....can we find a more amicable way to work this out"?
And yes, I do recall your saga with your employer and the jab back in 2021 that you so elegantly came out ahead on with your common law approach!
What's the net-net? There's no such thing as "bad bacteria". They're always working to benefit you. That some people die and become overwhelmed with pneumonia or sepsis is because they are already in a tremendously weakened state to begin with and can no longer handle the repair/restoration work being performed by the bacteria. Typically these are the more elderly and/or those with multiple co-morbidities. In these cases, a stiff round of anti-biotics can actually save the person in the short run, but they are left in a greatly weakened state forevermore, as the bacteria were not able to complete their restorative work, typically in the lungs.
Thanks for the quick reply buddy! It's only in reading you of late that I've had to consider the notion of the psyche affecting one's health. Of course the idea that your outlook affect how you feel has been around forever, probably with good reason. I'll check the link.
And as you alluded, my covid mandate battle certainly had me feeling powerless at many points, and at war with almost the entire office/company. I definitely wanted to bite someone.
What's the net-net? There's no such thing as "bad bacteria". They're always working to benefit you.
This is my thought too, but it's good to see it in black and white with regard to the category I'm thinking about. Thanks for your thoughts and pointers Morpheus.
Once you dig into the details, which few seem to be interested in doing, you'll begin to see that the western allopathic medical system, and by extension, "germ theory" is virtually all lies. I share this article for those of you who wish to learn for yourselves instead of taking our "pseudo-experts" word for it.
This is a very thorough article, and I tried to wade through it carefully. I get the author's conclusion, although, I felt it was missing the same summaries from other "terrain theory" articles/videos...what is the cause(s) of illness, if not germs/viruses?
Thank you for sharing this link.
Thanks for looking into it for yourself and not believing the pseudo-experts. Self-empowerment!
All dis-ease is caused by an unexpected and isolating life situation that catches you off guard. Your psyche (subconscious mind / soul / autonomic nervous system) is in full charge of every operation of your body - from breathing, to pumping blood, beating your heart, digesting your food, destroying old cells, creating new cells, etc. Your psyche does it all.
Likewise, when you experience a conflicting situation in life, your psyche responds to this as well and tries to assist you as best it can, often translating your figurative thoughts literally.
I've written extensively here about all the major germs/boogeyman-viruses. It takes some time to absorb the explanation for each one. I wish I could just say, it's not viruses, it's "Schmiruses"!! Unfortunately, it's not that simple.
However, when it comes to the dis-eases we have been led to BELIEVE, that we "catch and pass" to each other, like flus, colds, covid, pneumonia, etc., the underlying cause of all of these revolves around "fear". When you are worried, concerned, scared about "catching a bug", your psyche registers this fear and you instinctively begin to breathe more shallowly. You can think of a predator and prey. When the prey is scared, its instinct is to freeze and become undetectable by the prey. This primitive instinct still operates in humans as well as the animal kingdom.
This shallow breathing is compensated for by your psyche by temporarily widening your bronchial or laryngeal passages to enable you to uptake more oxygen while you are scared/worried. You are not "sick" during this time. When you get over your worry, your psyche reverses the process and rebuilds the tissue that it temporarily removed. And it is this RESTORATION process that we have all been taught to BELIEVE is "bad". During the restoration, the psyche generates, not "catches", its own bacterial forms to assist with the tissue rebuild, along with generating inflammation, excess fluid and higher body temperature in order to complete the process. And this is what we've been brainwashed into calling DIS-EASE, subsequently running to the doctors in hopes they can make it all go away as fast as possible.
It takes a lot of space to explain some of the other boogeyman-viruses but hopefully that gives you a sense of things. Fear in the lungs, anger in the abdominal region, self-devaluation in the bones and muscles, separation for the skin as some generalities.
Hope that helps you better understand. The "Terrain Theorists" are flailing in the dark unfortunately. They can't prove a causal relationship between any food, toxin, 5G signal, pesticide of anything else. They're lost in the "multi-factorial" explanation without any proof. What I'm sharing suggests all dis-ease is "monocausal" and results from the unexpected life event that throws us out of our normal rhythms.
Thank you for taking the time to explain your thoughts on this. The psychosomatic angle can perhaps explain why people experience similar symptoms as others, aided by fear, but it doesn't explain illness where there is no knowledge of others experiencing symptoms.
A lot of theories look to small-scale outbreaks from hundreds of years ago as explanation, but there don't seem to be any modern equivalents. The case about the sailors on a ship experiencing the same illness as natives on shore (was it Cuba?), when there was no landing party, comes to mind. I think we can say that a lot of illnesses from earlier periods were misdiagnosed, or similar agents attributed to different cases just because they occurred at the same time.
Just last week I watched a video by the red-haired doctor from New Zealand (forget her name at the moment) discussing Lyme disease. As this article did, she exposed how frail the evidence is for a tick-borne illness, but didn't offer an alternative explanation. Why is it, then, that people who are bit by deer ticks, and also get the "bull's eye" rash, get similar symptoms which respond to the same treatment? She also didn't mention that the facility on Plum Island (just across the sound from Lyme, CT) was researching using ticks as a vector for biological agents.
All these diseases attributed to mosquitos and ticks, depend upon the parasites biting a host of a disease first, infecting themselves, then passing along the infection to a second victim. I think it's safe to say that these smaller parasites (insects or arachnidae) very rarely feed twice as would be required. They either feed once successfully and lay eggs, or they fail to find a host in the time required, and die. They are born sterile, so how do "so many" become vectors for a unique disease?
I agree with the conclusions about, for instance, the 1918 Spanish flu was actually bacterial pneumonia/meningitis, and polio is actually a spectrum of neurological symptoms from pesticide exposure, but I've never come across a good, solid discussion of actual disease agents attributed to more common afflictions.
Agreed on this! I'd say most were, right up until this very day I might add. Cooties-1984 as the most obvious exemplar!
Dr. Sam Bailey - wonderful on boogyeman-viruses, but she's lost in "terrain theory" nonsense.
Because she can't offer any explanations as a terrain theory advocate. But I will. Lyme is primarily a self-devaluation conflict. And you'll notice, middle-aged women are most prone to it, as societal "standards" are devastating to their sense of worth. Whenever there's a rash involved, this is always a separate conflict, namely a separation conflict.
Any such tick bite can produce a standard histamine response. This has absolutely nothing to do with "lyme dis-ease" however, which is a made up thing, just like malaria, just like all "auto-immune" disorders as well. It's all lies. There's no such thing as an "immune system", and our bodies are so remarkably intelligent that suggesting they "mutate" or "attack themselves" is literally the height of absurdity. We're awash in an endless amount of lies!
Besides, well over 90% of people who think they have "lyme dis-ease" never report the so-callled "tell tale" tick bite to begin with.
Yep, this is the classic "conspiracy theory" psyop for the truther community. They always run one for the normies and one for the truthers. It's all bunk.
Have you been diagnosed with lyme?
They don't. The entire parasite story is also a lie. Shocker, eh? Parasites form symbiotic relationships with their hosts. There is something "in it" for both of them. The many gut parasites perform a valuable service, removing toxic waste that the person is unable to eliminate due to other conflicts they're suffering.
I used to. Now I understand it fully. There were no "bacterial attacks" as we have been led to believe. This has never been shown to be true. Koch's Postulates have never been satisfied. Something else happened. I wrote all about it here: https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZqU7uaXt/unleashed-special-editionisland-/
I too have heard the story of polio being caused by lead-arsenate and DDT. They may have contributed. I cannot dispute it because no actual proof has been presented. it's a theory. I've also heard the polio jabs themselves contributed to the issues. That too may be possible. We've never seen any definitive proof on either, and probably never will.
There is another explanation though. Motor conflicts are caused by severe self-devaluations. Think MS, ALS, parkinson's, osteoperosis, myalgia, neuropathy and a whole host of others. All eventually lead to paralysis. Could the children of the 1940s and 1950s been so frightened by parents, doctors, teachers, etc. that they began to fear they may have "contracted polio"? Certainly this is possible. And certainly, this did happen. Perhaps not for all cases, but some.
Another great trick of the conventional medical establishment is that they can and often do change the names of their diagnosis to give the appearance that a certain "viral dis-ease" has been eradicated. You don't have to look to far to see how blatantly they did this with almost zero cases of flu registering in 2020 and 2021. They clearly did this with polio too.
Dis-eases like ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease or motor neuron disease), Multiple Sclerosis, or Guillain-Barré syndrome are all clinically indistinguishable from "polio".
Once you learn their tricks, you can start to see through the lies. Good on you for doing your own research, asking questions, and not blindly believing the pseudo-experts. Our doctors have all been profoundly miseducated. They know not what they do or say.
When Q said "those you trust the most....", he wasn't kidding.
Thank you again for your lengthy analysis! You've certainly spent a lot of time thinking this all through.
I've been suffering from a broad-spectrum autoimmune condition for about fifteen years. It was triggered by long-term exposure to formaldehyde fumes coming from a new sofa we purchased. It took years for me to figure it out, mostly because we travel from home so infrequently. But on those occasions when we did, I began to feel better, and then I began learning about toxic environmental fumes in the home, etc. I realized there was an odor coming from the sofa after my body heat warmed it, so I purchased a test kit, which confirmed that the amount of formaldehyde was extremely high.
But even after stripping the sofa to the frame and rebuilding it with safe materials, the damage was done. The worst of the symptoms is a chronic "migraine" (though technically not a migraine) as a result of inflammation inside my skull. I know this because I can feel it, as do others who suffer from this type of specific inflammation. Everyone describes it the same way. It does respond to treatments geared towards migraine.
Having lived with this for a number of years, I can feel what's happening inside me preceding an attack. I can feel the histamines/cytokines going berserk after being exposed to certain triggers. Some of the symptoms mimic lupus, although I test negative for that. As a matter of fact, one of the triggers is being studied here in Florida, and is associated with red tide.
I never expected this condition, never knew about it, and am not a fearful person by nature. After I discovered it, I found out about the class-action lawsuits by airline stewardesses exposed to formaldehyde via their permanent-press uniforms, and the class-action lawsuit against Lumber Liquidators for their laminated flooring, among others.
More recently, I seem to have picked up Grover's Disease, diagnosed by my dermatologist. It's an odd, basically untreatable chronic rash. However, after I had it a few months, and went gluten-free (after confirmation of another problem) the rash went away almost instantaneously for a few months, then returned. (This made me suspect that the rash was connected to the gluten. Now, I suspect that it is autoimmune in origin and an outgrowth of the original autoimmune condition, although this is apparently disputed by researchers.) Again, I had no knowledge of this condition, and didn't have a "name" associated with it until after having it for 5-6 years.
All this gives me perhaps a unique insight into at least the autoimmune angle of things. Two of the medications in my arsenal are immunomodulators...and they work in precisely the manner you would expect them to. I know when I need to use them, and for how long. (It's actually an off-label use for both of them.) But I still haven't been able to "pop the cork" off my understanding of the truth between germ vs. terrain theory. Both sides of both arguments just don't seem to ring true, and I've tried to read and listen to as much as I can that seems credible.
Tissue samples were saved from 1918, and this helped unravel how the disease originated: https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2020/02/06/spanish-flu-of-1918-was-really-a-bioterror-attack-on-humanity
Excellent discussion about polio: https://rodneydodson000.medium.com/what-you-didnt-know-about-polio-26d20cba98e5
Thank you again for your input. I appreciate it! It's discussions like this that really help us to dig deeper...
Most of these can be chalked up to either self-devaluation or separation conflicts, but without more specifics, I can't offer much more.
I know many people who suffer from migraines. They arise during the epi-crisis of the healing state. If they are chronic, then you can liken the cause to an "allergy" of sorts, where something in your environment triggers the memory of your psyche to an event in your past, directly preceding your migraines. Typically these originally arise as the result of a powerless or frontal fear conflict. The former is self-explanatory but the frontal fear has to do with the fear of something "out ahead of you", "in the future". In short, something triggers your memory and you re-start the dis-ease process each time. Discovering and resolving your original conflict would bring an end to them.
I'm all too familiar with all the terrain theory stories of fumes, molds, household toxins, food toxins, etc. etc. While it's all quite intriguing, it always lacks specificity in the end. Why was only one person in the household effected by the fume/toxins/mold but not everybody? There's no sensible answer to this question. The same goes for alleged boogeymen-viruses. The "why doesn't everybody" question can never be satisfactorily answered in either of these theories.
All skin rashes of the epidermis are the result of a separation conflict. Either due to you not wanting to be separated from someone, or wanting to be separated from someone. When you are feeling the not or wanted separation, your psyche desensitizes your epidermis nerve endings in the regions that you associate with being close to this person. Grover's affects the trunk area, so this is likely related to you missing somebody you hugged often. The psyche does this so that when something or someone touches your trunk skin area, you don't feel it and are not reminded of your separation. When you have resolved the conflict in your mind, the psyche restores the nerve endings in the epidermis and this results in rashes, bumps, pox, etc. If you have recurring bouts and the condition is chronic, this means that you are reminded of this person from time to time.
Once again, our modality rejects all notions of these. We obviously acknowledge the symptoms and pain, just not the irrational theory that your body "attacks itself". Skin rashes like psoriasis, dermatitis, hives, measles, rubella, chicken pox, etc. are all a result of the separation conflict. The differences between the diagnosis are a question of intensity, duration and which stage of the dis-ease process you are in, for example, psoriasis is actually the result of two active separation conflicts. Conditions like eczema, shingles and melanoma afflict the deeper skin layer, the dermis, and are a result of an attack or feeling soiled/dirtied/sullied conflict. Your psyche attempts to strengthen your protection from the outside by hardening the deeper layer of the skin.
Your gut is correct. Neither are true.
Did you read my piece on the Spanish Flu? I agree that pneumonia played a big role, but the question is how and why? It's not "contagious, so something else must have been going on. I explain it all in detail in the linked thread.
if you're ready to dig deeper, here's your next adventure. It will take you some time to learn, but if you are motivated, you'll pick it up quickly enough. I like to start people on this "Search A-Z" page where you can look up some 500 or so common dis-eases and start to get a sense of things. https://learninggnm.com/SBS/documents/sbs_index.html#M
Good luck!
Unfortunately, I can't rectify what you describe with my own personal experience, but I don't doubt that it could be relevant with others. Thanks again for sharing a bit of your thoughts!
It requires a dedicated analysis and some deeper understanding of what mainstream medicine calls "allergies". We call these "unconscious associations".
Let's take the example of a young boy named Billy who becomes allergic to cats at age 8 for instance. Billy's family does not own a cat. One day Billy is over at his friend Mikey's house playing, and Mikey's family has a cat. They're a bit too rambunctious this one day and accidentally break an expensive vase in the living room. Mikey's mother enters the scene and begins to scream at both boys and scold them equally, perhaps even smacks around her son a bit. Billy has never seen anything like this. His parents do not behave in this way. He is shocked by the whole situation. Make sense?
Now, during the scolding event, while he is shocked, his psyche (subconscious mind) is recording all information it can take in. The sights, sounds, tastes, smells, etc. All this information gets recorded as "potentially dangerous" to his psyche. One such smell which is outside his normal experience is that of cat dander.
Now, every time Billy gets near a cat, his psyche recalls the shocking event at Mikey's house, and doing its best to protect Billy from another similar shock, it begins to make his eyes water and get bloodshot, his nose gets runny, he starts sneezing, etc. His psyche has associated cat dander with another potential crisis. And the leading medical experts of the world tell Billy he's got a "cat allergy".
Fast forward now and Billy is 50 years old. I tell Billy why he is allergic to cats. I have no idea what the trigger was, and he almost certainly won't make the connection right off the bat either. He's going to have to think back to when he first noticed he was allergic to cats. That part of the equation might be easy for him. However, the next part is typically not so easy. He then has to think back to the weeks/months prior to him first noticing he was allergic to cats and then recall this event at Mikey's house that he's all but forgotten about. And he naturally does not make any connection between it and the fact that they had a cat. And in some cases, if the event was highly traumatic to him, his psyche has buried his memory of the event until such time that it deems him ready and capable of finally processing it.
I lived in Austin, TX for 20 years. 25% of people that move to Austin are said to become allergic to the cedar pollen, which is unique to central Texas, within 5 years of moving there. 33% after 10 years. What's going on? You would think the instant you moved there, or at most 8 months from moving there in April, you would be "allergic". Why does it take so long?
Cedar pollen season lasts for about 4 months each year (Dec - March). If a person has a conflicting event during these 4 months, their psyche records the thick pollen as a potential danger, and now they're "allergic" to it. Like clockwork. It's the same story. And the same thing works with foods. If you're eating or have just eaten a certain food and get caught up in an unexpected conflicting situation, you're now allergic to the dairy, gluten, chocolate, pizza, etc. you were eating at the time.
The short-term resolution is to discover your trigger - a sight, sound, taste, smell and avoid it as best you can. The long-term resolution is to do the work as mentioned above. Think back to your first experience with the chronic dis-ease or "allergy". Then start evaluating unexpected negative events in your life in the weeks/months preceding it. For those who do this work, with some prompting of their psyche/soul, the answer will eventually pop into their head.
The longer ago that the event happened, the more likely the resolution will be fairly simple to achieve. In Billy's case, he's no longer friends with Mikey and he's never going to be playing at his house again. The conflict is resolved on the spot and he can consciously let his psyche know to no longer consider cats to be a danger. His "allergy" or chronic dis-ease disappears in that instant.
So this is the process for how you uncover and resolve chronic issues. In your case, skin is related to a separation conflict as I mentioned above. Something in your environment, or on TV, or in a book, or whatever, reminds you of being separated from someone you care about and this re-triggers the skin response on your trunk. And likewise with the migraine. You are reminded from time to time of an event where you lost something, felt powerless, were worried about something coming up in the future, etc.
My teacher told the story of how he would get a migraine every weekend for almost 5 years. His job required that he was on the road giving seminars Monday through Friday. But when he got home, because he drove so much, he didn't want to drive on the weekend. He went through dozens of possible triggers all through this period until he finally remembered that he had gotten into an accident a few months prior to his migraines beginning. While he was largely uninjured, he was pinned into his seat for a few hours before he could be removed. And it was during this time that he felt "powerless". And there was his conflict. Each Monday he was triggered back into conflict when he started the car. During the week he was fine because he remained conflict active. When he got home each Friday he resolved his conflict and typically on Saturday night, his migraine would kick in.
All this to say, even when you this material, it's not that simple to discover the trigger nor the event. It takes some earnest effort for most people.
You seem like a reasonable person, and as such, you must admit that what I've shared does make some sense, at least in relation to what the establishment and terrain people have to say. They don't have any explanation for why one person is allergic, or has an "auto-immune" issue, or a chronic issue, etc. while other people don't react in the same way. They've simply got no explanations on offer. Not to the cause, and therefore not for any cures.
More often than not, we naturally "cure ourselves", sometimes quite accidentally and unconsciously. And if we were taking supplementX or herbY or vitaminD at the time, we assume that it worked for us. There are a bazillion stories out there from people swearing therapy/supplement/herb/vitamin X cured their cancer, resolved their auto-immune disorder, fixed thier allegy, etc. They're a dime a dozen. FWIW, the placebo effect is very real too. So if you found something you think works for you, by all means, stick with it!
Anyway, good luck with your issues and thanks for your questions.
Like Mike Stone's stuff. Worth reading.
Hey u/Morpheus11 have you ever given any thought to the role of bacteria in dental health? The dentist is always going on about how they are eating away at my teeth. That sound reasonable on the service, but why would bacteria eat health bone? Why don't they eat away my jaw or skull for example?
Nice to hear from you Corrbrick.
Bacteria are never attacking or harmful to us. Our body actually creates bacteria, just like it creates cells/tissue. We don't "catch" them from "out there". We're probably 10-years away from this becoming common knowledge however.
The idea that bacteria "cause dis-ease" is a HALF-TRUTH that will difficult to unwind, as so many other lies will be too.
It's true that when bacteria become active in our body, that we then "feel sick", and thus you could say it's the bacteria making us sick. That's the half that's true. But what's happening is the bacteria are generated by the body to either repair or restore tissue that has been altered by our psyche (or autonomic nervous system) to deal with a perceived negative life situation. Depending on the germ layer, the psyche adds tissue (tumors/cancers) in the case of the oldest endoderm (organs and glands) in order to improve its function, or removes tissue during the conflict to help widen or eventually strengthen tissue of the ectoderm. Both the enamel and dentin are ectodermal.
You are likely going in and out of what we call a "bite conflict", very primal and instinctual in nature. This falls into the "self-devaluation" category of conflicts. The analogy to the canine world works quite nicely. When a dog is unhappy about something, they bear their front teeth to show their displeasure. Thus, the conflict here is that you wish to show somebody your displeasure, like say your spouse, boss, co-worker, child, parent, etc., but societal rules dictate you not do this to maintain the peace. Your dental issues would be in your top/front teeth if this is the case.
The next level is if you feel like you want to "snap at" your foe, opponent, person causing you irritation to teach them to stop doing/saying/acting as they are. Again, what's stopping you from expressing yourself are our artificial cultural rules of behavior. On one hand, you may be much stronger and in a superior position to this person and society reprimands us for "picking on somebody weaker than you". On the other hand, you may also feel you are in the position of weakness and feel like you could lose something should you "snap back" at this person - say a boss or a spouse. This type of conflict expresses in the incisors region, the teeth where a dog would "snap at" its opponent, but not really harm it, but rather send a stern message.
The strongest conflict is with the molars, where you instinctively want to "crush" your opponent, "grind them up" once and for all so to speak, to put an end to their unsavory behavior toward you.
In all cases, what's happening is, when you hold back your instinct, whichever it is, you're fundamentally saying "I CAN'T bare, bite, snap, crush" my opponent because......such and such a reason.
Make sense so far?
Now, the key to understanding all of this is how your psyche responds. It only registers the "I CAN'T BITE" part of the equation. It doesn't understand our societal and cultural rules and norms. It's only concerned with your survival. And when it hears I CAN'T, it concludes that you've decided you can't because your, in this case, teeth are too weak.
You can apply this same logic to all muscles, bones, connective tissue, etc. and the zillions of afflictions that people have with them. This is, by far, the largest category of conflicts people suffer -> SELF-DEVALUATION.
If you're with me thus far, here's what happens next. The process employed by the psyche is basically identical to lifting weights to make your muscles stronger, or even breaking a bone. In both cases, when the muscles are deliberately torn apart, or the bone is accidentally broken, your psyche always responds by building the muscle or bone stronger so as to help you survive a similar experience in the future.
And this is what's happening with your teeth. Your psyche hears I CAN"T BITE, and goes to work with breaking down your dentin or enamel in order to build it back stronger so that you will feel like you can bite when it completes the process.
This self-devaluation category is the hardest for people to understand because you don't see the benefit of it until the whole conflict and healing process is completed.
So it's likely that you go in and out of your bite conflict, with whomever it is associated with. The bacteria enter the mix AFTER you have resolved your conflict and they go about building stronger dentin/enamel for you. If there are no bacteria but increasing pain and cavities, your bite conflict is active and not yet resolved.
The whole sugar, brushing, flossing story is complete nonsense. I brush maybe once a week, never floss, and eat probably 10x the amount of sugar anybody I know my age, and haven't been to a dentist in over 20 years - no cavities, no dental issues. I realize you won't likely come around to the no brushing/flossing idea any time soon. But I'd recommend you consider it in the short term if you're experiencing pain in your teeth. You're scrubbing away the bacteria that are trying to make your teeth stronger/better. After they pain goes away, you can resume your brushing routine.
The hardest part of course, is figuring out who your foe is, and if you can find a way to let them know your displeasure with this person without suffering a greater loss, like losing a job. Most people I've worked with that have bite conflicts have them with their boss or a co-worker. A few with their spouses.
A little creative thinking can help you come up with a reasonable strategy to work out your issue. Sometimes, just a brief moment of tempered brutal honesty is all it takes -> "Hey boss, I don't like the way you treat me under these circumstances....can we find a more amicable way to work this out"?
And yes, I do recall your saga with your employer and the jab back in 2021 that you so elegantly came out ahead on with your common law approach!
What's the net-net? There's no such thing as "bad bacteria". They're always working to benefit you. That some people die and become overwhelmed with pneumonia or sepsis is because they are already in a tremendously weakened state to begin with and can no longer handle the repair/restoration work being performed by the bacteria. Typically these are the more elderly and/or those with multiple co-morbidities. In these cases, a stiff round of anti-biotics can actually save the person in the short run, but they are left in a greatly weakened state forevermore, as the bacteria were not able to complete their restorative work, typically in the lungs.
You can read more here if interested: https://learninggnm.com/SBS/documents/teeth.html#Enamel_CA
Good luck!
Thanks for the quick reply buddy! It's only in reading you of late that I've had to consider the notion of the psyche affecting one's health. Of course the idea that your outlook affect how you feel has been around forever, probably with good reason. I'll check the link.
And as you alluded, my covid mandate battle certainly had me feeling powerless at many points, and at war with almost the entire office/company. I definitely wanted to bite someone.
This is my thought too, but it's good to see it in black and white with regard to the category I'm thinking about. Thanks for your thoughts and pointers Morpheus.
Any time Corrbrick. Happy you're willing to contemplate these most radical ideas!