Then wtf were the WH ‘s doing when they were talking to him decades ago? Everything GEOTUS has done and will do has been calculated to the nth degree. GEOTUS did not walk into the unknown. He knew exactly what he was walking into
I disagree. Trump may have been recruited years ago by the military or whomever to be president to save the nation, but Trump is 100% his own man and is not going to be a puppet even for the military. Therefore it is completely reasonable for me to believe that once in office and having to make decisions on personnel he got fed some bad advice from RINO's and made some less than perfect choices. Nevermind the pool of talent is lacking as well. There just aren't that many people to work in these positions who are qualified and also MAGA...
Yeah I agree. I wonder if the Military has full access the way the CIA does or Mossad. Probably but in a different way. I suspect it is compartmentalized in ways we might not even know.
I get that there is some of the white hat part but Trump definitely is an alpha and will "pick his guys". That has to be why the military would even choose him in the first place knowing he loves America.
His picks" =/= who the Senate chooses to hire or not hire.
Presidents only have the authority to pick and hire their personal staff.
That's how people like Bannon and Flynn were able to work with him in the WH. They were part of his personal staff so the Senate couldn't refuse to hire them
Then that is something Trump should have been working to change or at least making an issue. The President should have the right to hire and fire who he wants except for when it comes to national security. There does need to be limits.
I think the senior executive service should be eliminated or pared down dramatically as that is where the lifer deep state live.
Sure. But his thought process in setting up his team(s) would have to be, "how can I utilize this person to get what effect I want?"
If he's a master tactician, then he would be making choices not based on whether this is a good person or bad person, but is this a good person [For THIS purpose]?
He would have to say this in order for the kayfabe to be consistent.
For example, Barr. He couldn't say Barr was my pick and it was a great pick, but by the way, he was a spineless AG.
That would not roll over.
The real issue is simply taking everything at face value. Not taking things at face value and then working through the information to see which explanations are most logical and which map on to the greatest number of data points.
In addition, its very possible that we was misled on some picks, BUT the key assertion the OP is presenting (which is Defecteds assertion), is that the KEY people like Barr, Sessions, Pence, etc, these would NOT be put in the positions they were in 'by mistake'.
Fwiw I do NOT agree with their beliefs about Pence who was on my radar before he endorsed Cruz in the 2016 Indiana primary.
However I don't really care if they want to engage in speculation that's based on minimal primary sourced and vetted secondary sourced research. Its their mental play time, not mine.
Nor am I attached to my guesses about Pence. I'm just glad that he wil! NOT be Trumps 2024 running mate or Trumps second term VP.
Consequently, I'm comfy embracing President Trumps "lets see what happens" attitude while doing what I can do to help him win the primary election and then the general election.
The thing about Barr is he is at the very least complicit in the cover up of Epstein's death. Either that or he is a very incompetent investigator. Not to mention his father's earlier connections with Epstein before he became wealthy. Also, Barr practically did no investigations into the 2020 steal, impeded some who tried, and continues to say Biden legitimately won.
These things are worth thinking about and not jumping to conclusions based on limited considerations.
What if Epstein was killed / didn't die, but was whisked away as part of a protection program because he is spilling all the beans?
What if the plan required that the fake Biden admin came into the White house? Exposure phase.
Think of the things that DID happen under Barr, including ongoing child trafficking stings.
Why is the MSM now courting Barr and inviting him to comment on things? Only because they believe he is "not Trump's guy".
Either Trump is incompetent, and the members of the team he is on are incompetent. or there is more going on here than meets the eye with Barr.
Do you really think that Trump has been recruited by the White hats, the q operation gamed out and implemented, and then they just screwed up by putting a blackhat Barr in place?
There is a LOT more going on than a lot of anons hear about, because they are focused on Y and not really on X.
After listening to Defected each week for the last 6 months, I've developed a very clear sense of what I think is going on. Many, many things that would be very difficult to explain otherwise. I've been tracking Q since Dec 2017, paying a lot of close attention. Even so, like almost ALL, I was completely thrown by what happened in Nov 2020 - Jan 2021.
These days, it makes a LOT more sense.
Key to this is the Q operation but really understanding Q requires seeing what has been happening up until today, what continues to happen, and then mapping it all out on various possible explanations. It really IS future proves past.
If Barr is in fact doing a kayfabe role, then you would expect him to "do no investigations into the 2020 steal, impede some who tried, and continue to say Biden legitimately won".
With everything else, these things in and of themselves do NOT prove that Barr is black.
There are MANY unknowns. And if we don't know, then it behooves us to keep an open mind and consider possibilities we haven't. The question is, which explanation maps on to the most data points the most consistently. That's my view, anyway.
Trump himself has said that he was misled in picking some of his people. He was new to DC so this is understandable.
Then wtf were the WH ‘s doing when they were talking to him decades ago? Everything GEOTUS has done and will do has been calculated to the nth degree. GEOTUS did not walk into the unknown. He knew exactly what he was walking into
I disagree. Trump may have been recruited years ago by the military or whomever to be president to save the nation, but Trump is 100% his own man and is not going to be a puppet even for the military. Therefore it is completely reasonable for me to believe that once in office and having to make decisions on personnel he got fed some bad advice from RINO's and made some less than perfect choices. Nevermind the pool of talent is lacking as well. There just aren't that many people to work in these positions who are qualified and also MAGA...
Pretty sure the military would have had intel to the nth degree on all of his picks. The people had to be shown just how deep the swamp was.
Yeah I agree. I wonder if the Military has full access the way the CIA does or Mossad. Probably but in a different way. I suspect it is compartmentalized in ways we might not even know.
I get that there is some of the white hat part but Trump definitely is an alpha and will "pick his guys". That has to be why the military would even choose him in the first place knowing he loves America.
His picks" =/= who the Senate chooses to hire or not hire.
Presidents only have the authority to pick and hire their personal staff.
That's how people like Bannon and Flynn were able to work with him in the WH. They were part of his personal staff so the Senate couldn't refuse to hire them
Trump has stated Christie is the one who whispered he should put Wray in.
Trump also briefly considered Christie for VP
"There are not that many people to work in those positions who' are qualified" AND who the SENATE would agree to hire.
ONLY the SENATE can HIRE or refuse to hire the Presidents admistration, including his cabinet aka his Department Heads.
The Senate refused to even give initial jobs interviews to some people President Trump wanted in his administration.
Anyone MAGA or seen as a threat to the DC Deep State would NOT be hired by the Senate.
Then that is something Trump should have been working to change or at least making an issue. The President should have the right to hire and fire who he wants except for when it comes to national security. There does need to be limits.
I think the senior executive service should be eliminated or pared down dramatically as that is where the lifer deep state live.
He had to know Bolton was a schmuck.
He used Bolton as leverage with Russia/Ukraine and even said so.
Sure. But his thought process in setting up his team(s) would have to be, "how can I utilize this person to get what effect I want?"
If he's a master tactician, then he would be making choices not based on whether this is a good person or bad person, but is this a good person [For THIS purpose]?
Is it the mustache? 😂👍🏻
Disinfo is necessary?
He would have to say this in order for the kayfabe to be consistent.
For example, Barr. He couldn't say Barr was my pick and it was a great pick, but by the way, he was a spineless AG.
That would not roll over.
The real issue is simply taking everything at face value. Not taking things at face value and then working through the information to see which explanations are most logical and which map on to the greatest number of data points.
In addition, its very possible that we was misled on some picks, BUT the key assertion the OP is presenting (which is Defecteds assertion), is that the KEY people like Barr, Sessions, Pence, etc, these would NOT be put in the positions they were in 'by mistake'.
Fwiw I do NOT agree with their beliefs about Pence who was on my radar before he endorsed Cruz in the 2016 Indiana primary.
However I don't really care if they want to engage in speculation that's based on minimal primary sourced and vetted secondary sourced research. Its their mental play time, not mine.
Nor am I attached to my guesses about Pence. I'm just glad that he wil! NOT be Trumps 2024 running mate or Trumps second term VP.
Consequently, I'm comfy embracing President Trumps "lets see what happens" attitude while doing what I can do to help him win the primary election and then the general election.
The thing about Barr is he is at the very least complicit in the cover up of Epstein's death. Either that or he is a very incompetent investigator. Not to mention his father's earlier connections with Epstein before he became wealthy. Also, Barr practically did no investigations into the 2020 steal, impeded some who tried, and continues to say Biden legitimately won.
Do you understand the concept of kayfabe here?
These things are worth thinking about and not jumping to conclusions based on limited considerations.
What if Epstein was killed / didn't die, but was whisked away as part of a protection program because he is spilling all the beans?
What if the plan required that the fake Biden admin came into the White house? Exposure phase.
Think of the things that DID happen under Barr, including ongoing child trafficking stings.
Why is the MSM now courting Barr and inviting him to comment on things? Only because they believe he is "not Trump's guy".
Either Trump is incompetent, and the members of the team he is on are incompetent. or there is more going on here than meets the eye with Barr.
Do you really think that Trump has been recruited by the White hats, the q operation gamed out and implemented, and then they just screwed up by putting a blackhat Barr in place?
There is a LOT more going on than a lot of anons hear about, because they are focused on Y and not really on X.
After listening to Defected each week for the last 6 months, I've developed a very clear sense of what I think is going on. Many, many things that would be very difficult to explain otherwise. I've been tracking Q since Dec 2017, paying a lot of close attention. Even so, like almost ALL, I was completely thrown by what happened in Nov 2020 - Jan 2021.
These days, it makes a LOT more sense.
Key to this is the Q operation but really understanding Q requires seeing what has been happening up until today, what continues to happen, and then mapping it all out on various possible explanations. It really IS future proves past.
If Barr is in fact doing a kayfabe role, then you would expect him to "do no investigations into the 2020 steal, impede some who tried, and continue to say Biden legitimately won".
With everything else, these things in and of themselves do NOT prove that Barr is black.
There are MANY unknowns. And if we don't know, then it behooves us to keep an open mind and consider possibilities we haven't. The question is, which explanation maps on to the most data points the most consistently. That's my view, anyway.
Careful or you will burst the Trump is perfect bubble, and the Q knows and controls everything bubble at the same time.
Offering snarky, unsolicited advice; advice based on fantasy rather than reality? How fun!!!