"...we have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics."
If a person cannot rationally discuss what a person said, and falls back to name calling and assumptions, I'd argue it is them who is in fact the blue haired liberal.
What one spends their limited and precious gifts of time "thinking" about and talking about is obviously a choice. However, Q pointed out repeatedly that choices are consequential.
Personally, since I'm bombarded constantly with psyop temptations vying for my attention, I'm glad that I gained a cursory understanding of a famous model for making decisions during a crisis.
This guidance is known as the Triage Decision Making Model.
Perhaps others will also find this easy to understand model to be helpful too.
Finally, even though I'm not a drinker, I still found AAs Serenity Prayer to be very useful since it trains people to distinguish between what they can control and what they cant.
The later category of things are the distractions our adversaries encourage people to focus on. Those things are what the bible, Q and AA encourage people to entrust to God.
You did not apply logic or critical thinking … you did a wrap up smear. You twisted his words and tried to extract some retarded distillation using the minced language tactic. You are either a Glowie, or a complete fucking idiot
You've already broken out the ad homs about four times now. But you should know or realize that logical fallacies hold no weight with conspiracy theorists. In fact, they undermine your position.
And to be clear, it's you who have twisted Ballards word to fit your motivation. I just took what he said at face value and made the observation that it fit the classic cabal non-denial pattern.
Again, consider why you're in such an emotional state. Can you reason soundly in this state?
Again, if you're in a state where you're name calling, consider if you're thinking for yourself or just running a program.
Is anything I stated untrue? As you understand the English language, did Ballard deny being involved in trafficking or Masonry?
You talk like a blue haired Liberal. Arrogant and condescending.
Ballard also didn't say he wasn't a bird, or a fish, or a Tranny. OHHH NOOO !!!!
"...we have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics."
If a person cannot rationally discuss what a person said, and falls back to name calling and assumptions, I'd argue it is them who is in fact the blue haired liberal.
What one spends their limited and precious gifts of time "thinking" about and talking about is obviously a choice. However, Q pointed out repeatedly that choices are consequential.
Personally, since I'm bombarded constantly with psyop temptations vying for my attention, I'm glad that I gained a cursory understanding of a famous model for making decisions during a crisis.
This guidance is known as the Triage Decision Making Model.
Perhaps others will also find this easy to understand model to be helpful too.
Finally, even though I'm not a drinker, I still found AAs Serenity Prayer to be very useful since it trains people to distinguish between what they can control and what they cant.
The later category of things are the distractions our adversaries encourage people to focus on. Those things are what the bible, Q and AA encourage people to entrust to God.
Pray for or prey on?
You did not apply logic or critical thinking … you did a wrap up smear. You twisted his words and tried to extract some retarded distillation using the minced language tactic. You are either a Glowie, or a complete fucking idiot
You've already broken out the ad homs about four times now. But you should know or realize that logical fallacies hold no weight with conspiracy theorists. In fact, they undermine your position.
And to be clear, it's you who have twisted Ballards word to fit your motivation. I just took what he said at face value and made the observation that it fit the classic cabal non-denial pattern.
Again, consider why you're in such an emotional state. Can you reason soundly in this state?
Kamala??? Is that you???