I get where merf is coming from. I think he is just staying outside the box. As in thinking outside the box. We always need those guys, so you don’t go completely into something blinded by the packaging. I mean Tim is former CIA. The man is very good at whatever he wants to be good at. I personally think he’s doing amazing things in the world vs child trafficking. I felt he answered the accusations. Although, yes technically he didn’t “lawyer wise”, but generally I felt he did. It doesn’t really matter to me. The guy is helping save children. And helping with awareness.
But I would never call someone just being the “what if” guy something like this.
Be careful guys, stick together, we’re all in the same boat. For me personally, I don’t trust anyone 100% outside of Jesus. Man will always be man. Until Jesus returns.
Firstly, consider whether by name-calling you've entered an emotional, programmed state. Are you thinking for yourself or just emoting a program?
Was anything I said idiotic or untrue?
Watch the video. Listen like a lawyer. Tell me if I'm misquoting him:
“It will never cease to amaze me how far these Godless leftists media will go to run interference for human traffickers.
I saw a post that seems to be trending in certain places saying that I am in favor of putting microchips in children so we can track them.
It’s complete bologna! I’ve never weighed in on that, I’ve never said anything, in fact, I’m very much against anything that would allow the government or others to control children.”
I found out yesterday that apparently I’m involved in trafficking, I run trafficking networks, or that I’m some mason involved in strange Masonic practices…
It’s not gonna stop. Expect every lie. At this point, I have been accused of everything but murder, so I want you to just expect more to come, including probably that I’ve killed people, who knows?"
Is that--as you know and understand the English language--a direct denial that he's involved in trafficking and/or Masonic practices? Compare how he doesn't deny that with how he directly denies being in favor of putting microchips in children.
Curious as to how you interpret two words in his tweet: “it” and “bologna.”
“It” refers to the entire lying campaign from the forces of darkness going against Tim (lies about chipping and murder and trafficking etc.) and all his hard work to bring awareness to human trafficking and to bring it DOWN.
“Bologna” is always used in the context of denying the absurd claims suggested.
When Tim said he found out that he is apparently involved in xyz, that, too, falls into the category of all of “it” being “bologna.”
Unless you have some lawyerly proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Tim is a swamp monster, you have no rational basis for even suggesting he’s anything less than a hero and a patriot. The burden of proof is on you.
This is your chance to prove (beyond reasonable doubt) Tim to be a liar or anything else swamp-like.
I think he's clearly referring to the microchips there, and directly refutes it.
People need to understand the joy the cabal feels when they can deceive us to our face. The highest form of their art is when they can trick us into hearing what we want to hear while they confess their crimes to us.
All I'm saying is that Ballard clearly just used that form of speech. It absolutely could have been done innocently, but we've seen the cabal use it in the past (think Bill Clinton and his definition of "sexual relations"). Be wary. Check your emotions at the door when doing analysis.
One of the techniques used by false accusers used to make something stick as much as possible is to attempt to define the conversation, the framework of the discussion, the rules of the board.
"When did you stop beating your wife?"
Sometimes going out to deny or refute accusations simply grants power to the accusers.
I don't think your observation is actually correct or helpful.
one - "does not deny any" actually he denied some of it.
two - " classic technique of impugning the accusers" implies that this is a nefarious defensive technique, does it not?
How many scumbags do you know who actually DENY what they are rightfully accused of?
Incorrect. Listen and/or read the transcript on the tweet.
"Expect every lie." does not equal "They were all lies."
Chill with the name calling and accusations. Breathe a minute. Consider what I'm saying and respond to my points. Think like a lawyer. Think like an English teacher.
What topic did Ballard explicitly deny? What topics did he dance round?
None of what I said passes judgement on Ballard. It's a simple observation that he didn't address the topic. My observation on that fact shouldn't trigger an emotional reaction in you.
Agreed, if it's not double speak it sure comes off like it. I want to believe this guy but we need to be suspicious first, confirm lack of guilt later in situations like this.
Overall though, the movie is having a very positive affect towards awareness of the subject so even if the guy that made it sucks (jury is still out) it's a chads move benefiting the WH more than the black hats at this time.
I agree with you. Critical thinking is necessary, and we don’t know who to trust.
Considering governments are behind human trafficking, ours being the worst, why aren’t they calling out the traffickers themselves? The governments? The CIA? Name names. Ballard knows whom are behind this 350 billion a year industry. If we should even call it that.
Discernment is a core necessity.
Anyone jumping on your ass is wrong.
Plus this dark to light business. That is Masonic. It’s good versus evil. God versus satan. Lucifer is the false light. Are we being led to the false light? Two sides of the same coin?
He did address the topic. You refuse to accept how he addresses it with the words “it” and “Bologna.” He’s not an English teacher or a lawyer, and the way he communicates is evidence of that. He’s a simple common man using simple language in his refutations. All the lies about him are Bologna. You must stop what you’re doing because it’s only hurting yourself.
How many simple, common men do you think are working at CIA and DHS on human trafficking?
I've made numerous analytical comments over the years in that exact form on this forum. Asking questions and rooting out bad actors is part of the day to day here. The deranged reaction it got indicates I inadvertently hit a target.
I had no opinion on Ballard whatsoever till I saw the backlash this morning, but based on just that I'm fairly confident he's up to something duplicitous now. 🤣
We demand an Inquisition now!!! Purity Tests pronto!!!!
Kek.
In the bible God says repeatedly "Fear not, for I am with you". Perhaps that explains why some people ARE fearful and why psyops encourage and exploit fears?
Who demanded purity tests? Who demanded piety policing?
You know anyone can be a mason you just have to be asked by a Mason. I was asked. The upper levels is where the strange shit happens. At least as far as I know. I am not one
I think there is a very simple way to discern the basic Truth in this situation.
Our entire movement, at its very core, is a movement to end the influence of a pedophile death cult engaged in Satanic ritual abuse of children who wish to depopulate and enslave humanity. In that, the movie Sound of Freedom represents a threat to their very existence.
To date, several million normie Americans have seen this movie which portrays one of the mechanisms the pedo death cult uses to round up children that will be used for their depraved rituals. The movies momentum hasnt peaked yet. It is reaching normie America in ways that Pizzagate and Q posts never could.
They cant abide by this.
Evil cant attack the message because the truth has been there lying below the surface in the minds of the People for decades. The key point that the people have been missing is the magnitude of these evil operations. Until now, most normies have been satisfied with the thought that these incidents are isolated and that the evil isnt organizational, even embedded within our institutions. Most of us here woke up with Pizzagate and the Hillary and Podesta emails. But this information has been hidden from most Americans.
The Sound of Freedom is clearing that confusion and doubt that men can be so evil and so coordinated in that evil.
So because they cant attack the message they attack the messengers. And for all to see, these attacks are obviously reactionary. They didnt begin until the threat became very real to the pedo death cult. There are articles all over MSM through the years describing the exact premise of this movie and done so in similar terms with similar conclusions.
And now they pretend these articles never were written and call what they once published themselves as coming from the 'Qanon' boogeyman. Then they attack those involved in the film as conspiracy theorists or involved in the evil themselves.
You have to ask yourself why would someone who is accused of being a freemason, someone they claim is a registered sex offender who wants to chip kids (chips and freemasonry werent even part of the movie but they know they will get an emotional response from Patriots) ever make a movie highlighting his own sins? It is ludicrous to think this way.
Crimes against children unite humanity. The pedo death cult is very aware of this and understand that this is the one point where they are the weakest. That these crimes will bring the entire rotten, corrupt, demonic edifice down upon them.
And that is why I am certain these are all lies to destroy the messenger and by doing so shove the message back into the shadows. And it is also why I believe that those contributing to these attacks, some who we have trusted in the past, are either falling for the psyop or are activated deep cover moles, gatekeepers, limited hangout narrative controllers or shills.
PS, sorry this was so long. I never had a problem with those papers in school that had to be a certain amount of words lol.
Edit: One other thing -- signal not noise. The movie is the signal, these attacks are the noise.
I do notice he does the classic technique of impugning the accusers (through implication and mockery) but does not deny any of what he's accused of...
Not saying I know anything about Ballard one way or the other, just an observation.
WTF. he says he didn't say that shit. You are an idiot
Looks like ole @merf is a glowie … or a kiddie fuker.
Or even a critical thinker… 😲
Critical thinkers don't come up with Imagine Ifs. He's a glowie.
I get where merf is coming from. I think he is just staying outside the box. As in thinking outside the box. We always need those guys, so you don’t go completely into something blinded by the packaging. I mean Tim is former CIA. The man is very good at whatever he wants to be good at. I personally think he’s doing amazing things in the world vs child trafficking. I felt he answered the accusations. Although, yes technically he didn’t “lawyer wise”, but generally I felt he did. It doesn’t really matter to me. The guy is helping save children. And helping with awareness. But I would never call someone just being the “what if” guy something like this.
Be careful guys, stick together, we’re all in the same boat. For me personally, I don’t trust anyone 100% outside of Jesus. Man will always be man. Until Jesus returns.
Thanks for proving you are retarded
Firstly, consider whether by name-calling you've entered an emotional, programmed state. Are you thinking for yourself or just emoting a program?
Was anything I said idiotic or untrue?
Watch the video. Listen like a lawyer. Tell me if I'm misquoting him:
“It will never cease to amaze me how far these Godless leftists media will go to run interference for human traffickers.
I saw a post that seems to be trending in certain places saying that I am in favor of putting microchips in children so we can track them.
It’s complete bologna! I’ve never weighed in on that, I’ve never said anything, in fact, I’m very much against anything that would allow the government or others to control children.”
I found out yesterday that apparently I’m involved in trafficking, I run trafficking networks, or that I’m some mason involved in strange Masonic practices…
It’s not gonna stop. Expect every lie. At this point, I have been accused of everything but murder, so I want you to just expect more to come, including probably that I’ve killed people, who knows?"
Is that--as you know and understand the English language--a direct denial that he's involved in trafficking and/or Masonic practices? Compare how he doesn't deny that with how he directly denies being in favor of putting microchips in children.
Me thinks you are a Glowie.
Says the Glowie
Again, if you're in a state where you're name calling, consider if you're thinking for yourself or just running a program.
Is anything I stated untrue? As you understand the English language, did Ballard deny being involved in trafficking or Masonry?
That pissed me off. Yes emotional response ignited - it's a very emotional topic -- EXACTLY the type of situation they love to use for manipulation
But I don't think he's a manipulator, just a person talking, not a demon twisting things.
Good to keep emotions out of stuff and just listen. The world is a powder keg right now and anything will be used to start it off.
Those against us want us pissed off and off center.
Stay alert and grounded.
Excellent summation.
Curious as to how you interpret two words in his tweet: “it” and “bologna.”
“It” refers to the entire lying campaign from the forces of darkness going against Tim (lies about chipping and murder and trafficking etc.) and all his hard work to bring awareness to human trafficking and to bring it DOWN.
“Bologna” is always used in the context of denying the absurd claims suggested.
When Tim said he found out that he is apparently involved in xyz, that, too, falls into the category of all of “it” being “bologna.”
Unless you have some lawyerly proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Tim is a swamp monster, you have no rational basis for even suggesting he’s anything less than a hero and a patriot. The burden of proof is on you.
This is your chance to prove (beyond reasonable doubt) Tim to be a liar or anything else swamp-like.
I think he's clearly referring to the microchips there, and directly refutes it.
People need to understand the joy the cabal feels when they can deceive us to our face. The highest form of their art is when they can trick us into hearing what we want to hear while they confess their crimes to us.
All I'm saying is that Ballard clearly just used that form of speech. It absolutely could have been done innocently, but we've seen the cabal use it in the past (think Bill Clinton and his definition of "sexual relations"). Be wary. Check your emotions at the door when doing analysis.
Stop deflecting.
LoL. Yo don't tell we what todo. Fuck off fag boy
One of the techniques used by false accusers used to make something stick as much as possible is to attempt to define the conversation, the framework of the discussion, the rules of the board.
"When did you stop beating your wife?"
Sometimes going out to deny or refute accusations simply grants power to the accusers.
I don't think your observation is actually correct or helpful.
one - "does not deny any" actually he denied some of it.
two - " classic technique of impugning the accusers" implies that this is a nefarious defensive technique, does it not?
How many scumbags do you know who actually DENY what they are rightfully accused of?
IMO, your observation is misplaced.
Well-stated.
The low IQ ones deny. The high IQ ones find clever ways to speak honestly without revealing what they did...
Fully agree here
Go back and listen. He said they were all lies. Does he really need to come out and address EACH bullshit lie? FFS.
Incorrect. Listen and/or read the transcript on the tweet.
"Expect every lie." does not equal "They were all lies."
Chill with the name calling and accusations. Breathe a minute. Consider what I'm saying and respond to my points. Think like a lawyer. Think like an English teacher.
What topic did Ballard explicitly deny? What topics did he dance round?
None of what I said passes judgement on Ballard. It's a simple observation that he didn't address the topic. My observation on that fact shouldn't trigger an emotional reaction in you.
Why and How do so many Glowies have Frogs next to their names?
Hey Merf, someone called you a Glowie and you didn't deny it so it's clear you're a Glowie.
Kudos and thanks for the Kek.
Mirroring can be fun. Especially with virtuous aggressives
Kudos and thanks for the Kek.
Mirroring can be fun. Especially when dealing with virtuous aggressives.
Those who are good hearted may eventually look in the proferred mirror, have an epiphany and a rueful laugh.
Fwiw such moments in my own life are still some of my favorite and most life transforming moments.
Now you're getting it! 🤣🤣
So let me put this rumor to rest at the same level Tim Ballard did:
I saw a post that seems to be trending on GAW from u/farpointpatriot that I'm a kiddie fucker.
It’s complete bologna! I’ve never weighed in on that, I’ve never said anything, in fact, I’m very much against anything that involves kiddie fucking.
I found out yesterday that apparently I’m involved in the FBI, I run pay ops networks, or that I’m some mason involved in strange Masonic practices…
It’s not gonna stop. Expect every lie.
Agreed, if it's not double speak it sure comes off like it. I want to believe this guy but we need to be suspicious first, confirm lack of guilt later in situations like this.
Overall though, the movie is having a very positive affect towards awareness of the subject so even if the guy that made it sucks (jury is still out) it's a chads move benefiting the WH more than the black hats at this time.
His last sentence is what gave me a little blip on the conspiracy radar…
But not passing any judgement either. But everything does need to stand up to scrutiny. Like DJT does.
I agree with you. Critical thinking is necessary, and we don’t know who to trust.
Considering governments are behind human trafficking, ours being the worst, why aren’t they calling out the traffickers themselves? The governments? The CIA? Name names. Ballard knows whom are behind this 350 billion a year industry. If we should even call it that.
Discernment is a core necessity.
Anyone jumping on your ass is wrong.
Plus this dark to light business. That is Masonic. It’s good versus evil. God versus satan. Lucifer is the false light. Are we being led to the false light? Two sides of the same coin?
He did address the topic. You refuse to accept how he addresses it with the words “it” and “Bologna.” He’s not an English teacher or a lawyer, and the way he communicates is evidence of that. He’s a simple common man using simple language in his refutations. All the lies about him are Bologna. You must stop what you’re doing because it’s only hurting yourself.
How many simple, common men do you think are working at CIA and DHS on human trafficking?
I've made numerous analytical comments over the years in that exact form on this forum. Asking questions and rooting out bad actors is part of the day to day here. The deranged reaction it got indicates I inadvertently hit a target.
I had no opinion on Ballard whatsoever till I saw the backlash this morning, but based on just that I'm fairly confident he's up to something duplicitous now. 🤣
http://templartimes.smotj.org/20150715_news.htm
"Timothy Blain Ballard"
He is a member of the Knights Templar --- not writing him off, especially after what Q said, but being skeptical is not wrong here.
We have double agents and deceivers EVERYWHERE.
I will fault no one for being skeptical, if he was accused of being a Mason why wouldn't he say he is a Knights Templar and break the ice atleast?
We demand an Inquisition now!!! Purity Tests pronto!!!!
Kek.
In the bible God says repeatedly "Fear not, for I am with you". Perhaps that explains why some people ARE fearful and why psyops encourage and exploit fears?
Who demanded purity tests? Who demanded piety policing?
Christ? The pharisees and saducees aka lawyers?
I’m not convinced it was a Masonic tie. It’s too blurry and low resolution to zoom in on the original. Could also be photoshopped. Idk. Hard to tell.
You know anyone can be a mason you just have to be asked by a Mason. I was asked. The upper levels is where the strange shit happens. At least as far as I know. I am not one
I think there is a very simple way to discern the basic Truth in this situation.
Our entire movement, at its very core, is a movement to end the influence of a pedophile death cult engaged in Satanic ritual abuse of children who wish to depopulate and enslave humanity. In that, the movie Sound of Freedom represents a threat to their very existence.
To date, several million normie Americans have seen this movie which portrays one of the mechanisms the pedo death cult uses to round up children that will be used for their depraved rituals. The movies momentum hasnt peaked yet. It is reaching normie America in ways that Pizzagate and Q posts never could.
They cant abide by this.
Evil cant attack the message because the truth has been there lying below the surface in the minds of the People for decades. The key point that the people have been missing is the magnitude of these evil operations. Until now, most normies have been satisfied with the thought that these incidents are isolated and that the evil isnt organizational, even embedded within our institutions. Most of us here woke up with Pizzagate and the Hillary and Podesta emails. But this information has been hidden from most Americans.
The Sound of Freedom is clearing that confusion and doubt that men can be so evil and so coordinated in that evil.
So because they cant attack the message they attack the messengers. And for all to see, these attacks are obviously reactionary. They didnt begin until the threat became very real to the pedo death cult. There are articles all over MSM through the years describing the exact premise of this movie and done so in similar terms with similar conclusions.
And now they pretend these articles never were written and call what they once published themselves as coming from the 'Qanon' boogeyman. Then they attack those involved in the film as conspiracy theorists or involved in the evil themselves.
You have to ask yourself why would someone who is accused of being a freemason, someone they claim is a registered sex offender who wants to chip kids (chips and freemasonry werent even part of the movie but they know they will get an emotional response from Patriots) ever make a movie highlighting his own sins? It is ludicrous to think this way.
Crimes against children unite humanity. The pedo death cult is very aware of this and understand that this is the one point where they are the weakest. That these crimes will bring the entire rotten, corrupt, demonic edifice down upon them.
And that is why I am certain these are all lies to destroy the messenger and by doing so shove the message back into the shadows. And it is also why I believe that those contributing to these attacks, some who we have trusted in the past, are either falling for the psyop or are activated deep cover moles, gatekeepers, limited hangout narrative controllers or shills.
PS, sorry this was so long. I never had a problem with those papers in school that had to be a certain amount of words lol.
Edit: One other thing -- signal not noise. The movie is the signal, these attacks are the noise.