For all the haters and deniers. Q told us we are not alone. Read the post yourself and see.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (96)
sorted by:
Angels, Demons, Aliens, Space Ships, God.. There is a collection of really old books condensed into one that eludes to all these things. Maybe you heard of it?
Yes the Bible contains some truth. But you must be aware that it has been changed over time. Tells a much different story when compared to the actual events.
This is true, some of the more contraversial scriptures were removed centuries ago.
Or maybe, after the discoveries of earlier and more accurate biblical manuscripts, it was discovered that those controversial scriptures were added later, and therefor should be removed?
Indeed. Thank you
There are 75 book removed from the Bible at different times for different reasons. Most are from the dark period (between the old and new testament). A large portion was removed by one leading sect of four distinct Jewish Rabbi teachings at the time. These are called apocryphal texts which do not align in part with the narrative of the presiding faith of this particular sect. Other books were removed by the catholic church and then the protestant reformation movement for similar reasons. Looking at the list of removed you find many additional cannons associated with todays King James version. Its a rabbit hole for sure and a lot to take in. You will find contradiction, potential mis-information and withheld information to support a particular narrative in this rabbit hole.
One thing for sure we can learn from the bible, there is nothing new under the sun.
When was it changed? Because we have 3 documented chains of custody, and the bible maintains a 98% contextual accuracy, which is the highest rating in all of literary works...
This is just silly. When compared to actual events..such as. The bible has stood the test of time. Books have been taken out of the cannon yet they still can be viewed in other places.
Amazing you would say this. That is assuming the cabal/bloodline didn’t purposely corrupt biblical text and doctrine, which I know for a fact they have done exactly that. Look at how they treated Yeshuah… what do you think they would do to his apostles and their books. I’m sorry fren, but I have to tell you the Bible is most definitely not even 50% in accuracy with its original message and instructions. A clear example is the cast differences in the God of Genesis and the God Yeshuah called father…
Evil can only do what God allows. To deny that God could give us his truth even through corrupted world is to say God is not sovereign over all things. The bible is 100% the true word of God and any confusion isnt because scripture isn't correct, it's because your understanding is off.
Your view leads to people picking and choosing what they want being tossed about in the chaos
He didn’t agree to it being changed. I don’t think it’s changed at all. He mentioned chapters removed, which is true, I assume removed by the Catholic Church. In those books, esp referring to the book of Enoch, would show a bigger picture to what’s has happened, and may be happening.
Enoch is not the only book, but when it comes to the topic of creation and the abundance of life in the cosmos, Enoch is actually describing it even tho most people miss it when they read it.
If you remove books that used to be cannon in the Bible. That is indeed changing it. Because it no longer includes parts that would change the perspective on the rest of the book.
I don’t see that as changed. I see it missing chapters. If the Bible has been changed by man, then it’s not Gods Word. And therefore useless. And I’m not about to call the Bible useless.
And yes I know Enoch isn’t the only book missing. It’s like 16 books missing. Or maybe it’s was 8-9. Either way lots of info is missing. Not changed...missing.
Edit. I don’t care what Q says about the moon landing. I don’t believe it. Once again, I’d bet everything I own as we’ve never landed on the moon. We simply DO NOT have the intelligence and technology to do so. Esp going back to the 60’s. We couldn’t even do it today, tech wise.
Your claim is partially accurate but needs further context and clarification. When books are removed from the biblical canon, it does result in a change to the collection of texts, and these removed books will no longer be included in the Bible. This aspect of your claim is true.
However, whether the removal of certain books would significantly change the overall perspective on the rest of the Bible depends on the specific books in question and their contents. The biblical canon was formed over centuries through careful considerations of various criteria, including apostolic authorship, orthodox content, and widespread acceptance. The books that were eventually included were deemed to be consistent with the core teachings and beliefs of Judaism (if were solely discussing the Old Testament)..
While some removed books, known as apocryphal or pseudepigraphal writings, may offer additional historical or theological insights, their exclusion didn't drastically alter the central message and doctrines of the Bible. The core themes and teachings that are essential to Christianity and Judaism are found in the accepted books of the Bible, and these teachings remain unchanged regardless of the exclusion of other writings.
In summary, your claim correctly acknowledges that removing books from the biblical canon does result in changes to the collection of texts. However, it should be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis whether these excluded books would have significantly altered the overall perspective on the rest of the OT Bible, keeping in mind that the canonical books were selected based on established criteria to preserve the essential teachings of the Judaism faith.