For all the haters and deniers. Q told us we are not alone. Read the post yourself and see.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (96)
sorted by:
He didn’t agree to it being changed. I don’t think it’s changed at all. He mentioned chapters removed, which is true, I assume removed by the Catholic Church. In those books, esp referring to the book of Enoch, would show a bigger picture to what’s has happened, and may be happening.
Enoch is not the only book, but when it comes to the topic of creation and the abundance of life in the cosmos, Enoch is actually describing it even tho most people miss it when they read it.
If you remove books that used to be cannon in the Bible. That is indeed changing it. Because it no longer includes parts that would change the perspective on the rest of the book.
I don’t see that as changed. I see it missing chapters. If the Bible has been changed by man, then it’s not Gods Word. And therefore useless. And I’m not about to call the Bible useless.
And yes I know Enoch isn’t the only book missing. It’s like 16 books missing. Or maybe it’s was 8-9. Either way lots of info is missing. Not changed...missing.
Edit. I don’t care what Q says about the moon landing. I don’t believe it. Once again, I’d bet everything I own as we’ve never landed on the moon. We simply DO NOT have the intelligence and technology to do so. Esp going back to the 60’s. We couldn’t even do it today, tech wise.
That claim you make takes extraordinary faith. But do not mistake faith for truth. Anyone can have faith in a lie. This is precisely how people are okay with communist takeover. If you believe that you hold the absolute truth, you already lost in the game of learning to forget, so that we can learn to remember. Expand your thinking, seek the answers from with in.
So do I believe the Bible is truth, yes. So of that makes me lose a game of forgetting? Then so be it.
Your claim is partially accurate but needs further context and clarification. When books are removed from the biblical canon, it does result in a change to the collection of texts, and these removed books will no longer be included in the Bible. This aspect of your claim is true.
However, whether the removal of certain books would significantly change the overall perspective on the rest of the Bible depends on the specific books in question and their contents. The biblical canon was formed over centuries through careful considerations of various criteria, including apostolic authorship, orthodox content, and widespread acceptance. The books that were eventually included were deemed to be consistent with the core teachings and beliefs of Judaism (if were solely discussing the Old Testament)..
While some removed books, known as apocryphal or pseudepigraphal writings, may offer additional historical or theological insights, their exclusion didn't drastically alter the central message and doctrines of the Bible. The core themes and teachings that are essential to Christianity and Judaism are found in the accepted books of the Bible, and these teachings remain unchanged regardless of the exclusion of other writings.
In summary, your claim correctly acknowledges that removing books from the biblical canon does result in changes to the collection of texts. However, it should be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis whether these excluded books would have significantly altered the overall perspective on the rest of the OT Bible, keeping in mind that the canonical books were selected based on established criteria to preserve the essential teachings of the Judaism faith.
If, by chance, you are referring to the apocryphal writings in the intertestamental period then you must know that the Hebrew Bible or Tanakh, does not include the apocryphal writings. These writings are considered part of the deuterocanonical books by Catholics and some other Christian denominations, but they were never included in the Jewish canon in the first place.
The apocryphal writings are a group of texts that were written during the intertestamental period, between the composition of the last book of the Hebrew Bible and the beginning of the New Testament. They are found in the Septuagint, a Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures, which was used by some early Christian communities.
However, the Jewish community did not include these apocryphal writings in their official canon, considering them as distinct from the inspired books of the Hebrew Bible. The decision to include these texts in the Old Testament canon was made by certain Christian communities, most notably the Catholic Church, during the Council of Trent in the 16th century.
So, while the apocryphal writings are part of the Old Testament canon for some Christian denominations, they are not included in the Jewish Old Testament, which consists of the books of the Hebrew Bible recognized by the Jewish community.
Listen to Clif High's take on religious texts:
https://clifhigh.substack.com/p/hidden-space-aliens
(Play at 1.5x speed.)
Something tells me you have not read the removed books that still exist today…
What makes you think that?