For all the haters and deniers. Q told us we are not alone. Read the post yourself and see.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (96)
sorted by:
Yes the Bible contains some truth. But you must be aware that it has been changed over time. Tells a much different story when compared to the actual events.
This is true, some of the more contraversial scriptures were removed centuries ago.
Or maybe, after the discoveries of earlier and more accurate biblical manuscripts, it was discovered that those controversial scriptures were added later, and therefor should be removed?
Indeed. Thank you
There are 75 book removed from the Bible at different times for different reasons. Most are from the dark period (between the old and new testament). A large portion was removed by one leading sect of four distinct Jewish Rabbi teachings at the time. These are called apocryphal texts which do not align in part with the narrative of the presiding faith of this particular sect. Other books were removed by the catholic church and then the protestant reformation movement for similar reasons. Looking at the list of removed you find many additional cannons associated with todays King James version. Its a rabbit hole for sure and a lot to take in. You will find contradiction, potential mis-information and withheld information to support a particular narrative in this rabbit hole.
One thing for sure we can learn from the bible, there is nothing new under the sun.
When was it changed? Because we have 3 documented chains of custody, and the bible maintains a 98% contextual accuracy, which is the highest rating in all of literary works...
This is just silly. When compared to actual events..such as. The bible has stood the test of time. Books have been taken out of the cannon yet they still can be viewed in other places.
Amazing you would say this. That is assuming the cabal/bloodline didn’t purposely corrupt biblical text and doctrine, which I know for a fact they have done exactly that. Look at how they treated Yeshuah… what do you think they would do to his apostles and their books. I’m sorry fren, but I have to tell you the Bible is most definitely not even 50% in accuracy with its original message and instructions. A clear example is the cast differences in the God of Genesis and the God Yeshuah called father…
Evil can only do what God allows. To deny that God could give us his truth even through corrupted world is to say God is not sovereign over all things. The bible is 100% the true word of God and any confusion isnt because scripture isn't correct, it's because your understanding is off.
Your view leads to people picking and choosing what they want being tossed about in the chaos
God creator of the universe allows for free will. Even evil has free will, and in their exercise of this free will by choosing darkness’s, they accumulate negative karmic debt that needs to be repaid. All that you do unto others, will be done onto you, because what ever you do to others, you do to yourself. This is where the concepts of hell and heaven come from. But the journey does not end there. Heaven is another dimension where it’s a lot easier to keep doing good and continue soul evolution. While hell is where the soul will have to repay the karmic debt by experiencing the same things they made others suffer. A soul is eternal, there is no lake of fire that consumes a soul, each soul is a part of God, and to destroy a soul would mean to destroy a part of God… God is infinite love and infinite wisdoms, with him lies the infinite potential to make anything or be anything. You can’t destroy that, and as such, no soul is ever destroyed because all souls are part of the creator. Blessings
He didn’t agree to it being changed. I don’t think it’s changed at all. He mentioned chapters removed, which is true, I assume removed by the Catholic Church. In those books, esp referring to the book of Enoch, would show a bigger picture to what’s has happened, and may be happening.
Enoch is not the only book, but when it comes to the topic of creation and the abundance of life in the cosmos, Enoch is actually describing it even tho most people miss it when they read it.
If you remove books that used to be cannon in the Bible. That is indeed changing it. Because it no longer includes parts that would change the perspective on the rest of the book.
I don’t see that as changed. I see it missing chapters. If the Bible has been changed by man, then it’s not Gods Word. And therefore useless. And I’m not about to call the Bible useless.
And yes I know Enoch isn’t the only book missing. It’s like 16 books missing. Or maybe it’s was 8-9. Either way lots of info is missing. Not changed...missing.
Edit. I don’t care what Q says about the moon landing. I don’t believe it. Once again, I’d bet everything I own as we’ve never landed on the moon. We simply DO NOT have the intelligence and technology to do so. Esp going back to the 60’s. We couldn’t even do it today, tech wise.
That claim you make takes extraordinary faith. But do not mistake faith for truth. Anyone can have faith in a lie. This is precisely how people are okay with communist takeover. If you believe that you hold the absolute truth, you already lost in the game of learning to forget, so that we can learn to remember. Expand your thinking, seek the answers from with in.
Your claim is partially accurate but needs further context and clarification. When books are removed from the biblical canon, it does result in a change to the collection of texts, and these removed books will no longer be included in the Bible. This aspect of your claim is true.
However, whether the removal of certain books would significantly change the overall perspective on the rest of the Bible depends on the specific books in question and their contents. The biblical canon was formed over centuries through careful considerations of various criteria, including apostolic authorship, orthodox content, and widespread acceptance. The books that were eventually included were deemed to be consistent with the core teachings and beliefs of Judaism (if were solely discussing the Old Testament)..
While some removed books, known as apocryphal or pseudepigraphal writings, may offer additional historical or theological insights, their exclusion didn't drastically alter the central message and doctrines of the Bible. The core themes and teachings that are essential to Christianity and Judaism are found in the accepted books of the Bible, and these teachings remain unchanged regardless of the exclusion of other writings.
In summary, your claim correctly acknowledges that removing books from the biblical canon does result in changes to the collection of texts. However, it should be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis whether these excluded books would have significantly altered the overall perspective on the rest of the OT Bible, keeping in mind that the canonical books were selected based on established criteria to preserve the essential teachings of the Judaism faith.
If, by chance, you are referring to the apocryphal writings in the intertestamental period then you must know that the Hebrew Bible or Tanakh, does not include the apocryphal writings. These writings are considered part of the deuterocanonical books by Catholics and some other Christian denominations, but they were never included in the Jewish canon in the first place.
The apocryphal writings are a group of texts that were written during the intertestamental period, between the composition of the last book of the Hebrew Bible and the beginning of the New Testament. They are found in the Septuagint, a Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures, which was used by some early Christian communities.
However, the Jewish community did not include these apocryphal writings in their official canon, considering them as distinct from the inspired books of the Hebrew Bible. The decision to include these texts in the Old Testament canon was made by certain Christian communities, most notably the Catholic Church, during the Council of Trent in the 16th century.
So, while the apocryphal writings are part of the Old Testament canon for some Christian denominations, they are not included in the Jewish Old Testament, which consists of the books of the Hebrew Bible recognized by the Jewish community.
Something tells me you have not read the removed books that still exist today…