I'm gonna stop this right here with irrefutable evidence before your get attacked by frogs or the the mods. When you live near either of the poles, the stars have a obvious circular path and you always see the same stars over the course of the night. When you live closer to the equator, the constellations parade across the sky in a linear fashion.
The apparent motion of the stars in the night sky are due to Earth's rotation on its axis. Looking north, the stars form concentric circles around the north celestial pole, near Polaris. Stars closer to the poles form smaller arcs and hardly seem to show any diurnal motion. Looking towards the celestial equator, however, stars begin to move parallel towards each other and only the stars further away begin to form arcs as they come closer to the celestial poles.Here is time lapse imagery of the night sky as seen from near the north pole.
Here's a video that compares the stars trails from both the northern and southern points of view.
Time-lapse and star trail video's compiled into a movie - each clip contains around 500 stills rendered using LightRoom and StarStax. The images were taken in summer on the Island of Guernsey UK for the Northern Hemisphere, and the Warrumbungle Ranges near Siding Springs Australia for the Southern Hemisphere.
You are addressing the 1850's model. This does nothing to address the fact that the most modern Flat Earth model is the Bi-Polar model here - https://wiki.tfes.org/Bi-Polar_Model
Please send the meat of my response to the next person who posts this crap here. My argument is irrefutable by the flat earth model and these people will never stop until they see the truth.
Yeah trust me, i know where you're coming from, but the modmails on these things sometimes.. there's enough to fill volumes.. it really is a waste. i sometimes feel pain for the mod that read it and responded to each point.. i couldn't do it. My own response to them are pretty much copy/paste:
Long-running, conclusive/inconclusive debates over conspiracies like flat earth, big foot, ufo's, mermaids, ghosts, faries, lockness monsters, and other similar things unrelated to greatawakening.win are not permitted, and must go to conspiracies.win.
The users of greatawakening.win work under the assumption the earth's shape is a globe. If the flat earth debate is settled and proves that assumption wrong, this community will revisit that assumption at that time.
tl;dr: if you want to talk flat earth here, get to conspiracies.win to prove it to the world, then we can start talking of it here.
I'm gonna stop this right here with irrefutable evidence before your get attacked by frogs or the the mods. When you live near either of the poles, the stars have a obvious circular path and you always see the same stars over the course of the night. When you live closer to the equator, the constellations parade across the sky in a linear fashion.
The apparent motion of the stars in the night sky are due to Earth's rotation on its axis. Looking north, the stars form concentric circles around the north celestial pole, near Polaris. Stars closer to the poles form smaller arcs and hardly seem to show any diurnal motion. Looking towards the celestial equator, however, stars begin to move parallel towards each other and only the stars further away begin to form arcs as they come closer to the celestial poles.Here is time lapse imagery of the night sky as seen from near the north pole.
https://youtu.be/st73OGc9y6Y
Here's a video that compares the stars trails from both the northern and southern points of view.
Time-lapse and star trail video's compiled into a movie - each clip contains around 500 stills rendered using LightRoom and StarStax. The images were taken in summer on the Island of Guernsey UK for the Northern Hemisphere, and the Warrumbungle Ranges near Siding Springs Australia for the Southern Hemisphere.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNiNJC3UHIo
You are addressing the 1850's model. This does nothing to address the fact that the most modern Flat Earth model is the Bi-Polar model here - https://wiki.tfes.org/Bi-Polar_Model
Also, the video you provided is only a partial rotation and does not even debunk the Monopole explanation here - https://wiki.tfes.org/Southern_Celestial_Rotation#Glass_Dome_Example
Wisdom pursues you, but you are faster.
~71% of the Earth's surface is covered by water, which is not carbonated. The Earth is therefore technically flat.
I see what you did there.
Conspiracies.win banishment/removal
Please send the meat of my response to the next person who posts this crap here. My argument is irrefutable by the flat earth model and these people will never stop until they see the truth.
We have pretty strict rules on this.. conspiracies.win material. Not worth arguing it, and it clogs the board. people aren't here for this.
I agree and I was wrong that they couldn't refute my evidence. I promise not to feed the animals anymore. Thanks for keeping our pond comfy.
Yeah trust me, i know where you're coming from, but the modmails on these things sometimes.. there's enough to fill volumes.. it really is a waste. i sometimes feel pain for the mod that read it and responded to each point.. i couldn't do it. My own response to them are pretty much copy/paste:
Long-running, conclusive/inconclusive debates over conspiracies like flat earth, big foot, ufo's, mermaids, ghosts, faries, lockness monsters, and other similar things unrelated to greatawakening.win are not permitted, and must go to conspiracies.win.
The users of greatawakening.win work under the assumption the earth's shape is a globe. If the flat earth debate is settled and proves that assumption wrong, this community will revisit that assumption at that time.
tl;dr: if you want to talk flat earth here, get to conspiracies.win to prove it to the world, then we can start talking of it here.
Uh oh. Careful...
I can tell you one thing... I don't believe anything anymore.
I could make a joke here, but last time I got in trouble.
Yes. The fundamental concept of a star which has a planet which has a moon cannot exist. See https://wiki.tfes.org/Three_Body_Problem