I spoke of the BRINK of civil war. It would be a precipice: the impending event that no one wants. This would have little to do with the MSM. It would be the accumulation of outrages (i.e., offenses against the public and law & order).
If there isn't the perception of an authentic threat, how can there be a "precipice"? Anything less than authenticity would be fake. (The threat of nuclear war emerging from our meddling in Ukraine is possible, but not tangible. It would be fake up to the point where it occurs.) I see a lot of speculation on this board about what the precipice could be, which only tells me we have no idea what it means.
Internal threats, like collapsed Banks, all accounts frozen, no food in the shops.
Oh, it will be authentic alright. Wont even be surprised if a nuke is launched into the air and gets intercepted at the last moment, and it turns out the warhead was armed and then people get to find out who gave the launch go ahead.
And among the internal threats would be an impending civil war, or breakdown of order. I don't know why you would exclude it. Q did not exclude "impending." I'm not so impressed with the threat of frozen bank accounts and food shortages. We already went through some of that with Covid, and the public went along with it like sheep. Many of them literally chose to die rather than buck the system (failed to do due diligence about the "vaccine"---to coin a phrase, "Injections have consequences").
As for nukes, I would be surprised if we could intercept one (if it was fired at us). I would be more concerned at the threat of us firing at Russia. Literally, picking a fight with a bear, leading to nuke shots we couldn't intercept. (I worked in strategic defense for 20 years and what we have today is like a towel in a San Francisco bathhouse: near-nakedness.)
Simple reason - it would not be a controllable threat and the precipice is all about complete control. In an impending threat of a civil war, all it it takes is for one person in one nameless city to brutalize someone and share the video, and then even all the WHs wont be able to stop what happens next.
Additionally, all that hatredness between brethern right before the Great Awakening would not be conducive to Great Awakening.
So I firmly standby my prediction that there will be no impending civil war. I know some people relish at the idea of one, even an impending one. Not me. I grew up amongst constant communal riots, and I wouldn't wish on my enemies.
civil war = people fighting against each other, where as
precipice = people seeing the real enemy and what they are doing to us.
So, no, precipice will not be civil war.
u/#q1664
I spoke of the BRINK of civil war. It would be a precipice: the impending event that no one wants. This would have little to do with the MSM. It would be the accumulation of outrages (i.e., offenses against the public and law & order).
If there isn't the perception of an authentic threat, how can there be a "precipice"? Anything less than authenticity would be fake. (The threat of nuclear war emerging from our meddling in Ukraine is possible, but not tangible. It would be fake up to the point where it occurs.) I see a lot of speculation on this board about what the precipice could be, which only tells me we have no idea what it means.
External threats, like an impending nuclear war.
Internal threats, like collapsed Banks, all accounts frozen, no food in the shops.
Oh, it will be authentic alright. Wont even be surprised if a nuke is launched into the air and gets intercepted at the last moment, and it turns out the warhead was armed and then people get to find out who gave the launch go ahead.
And among the internal threats would be an impending civil war, or breakdown of order. I don't know why you would exclude it. Q did not exclude "impending." I'm not so impressed with the threat of frozen bank accounts and food shortages. We already went through some of that with Covid, and the public went along with it like sheep. Many of them literally chose to die rather than buck the system (failed to do due diligence about the "vaccine"---to coin a phrase, "Injections have consequences").
As for nukes, I would be surprised if we could intercept one (if it was fired at us). I would be more concerned at the threat of us firing at Russia. Literally, picking a fight with a bear, leading to nuke shots we couldn't intercept. (I worked in strategic defense for 20 years and what we have today is like a towel in a San Francisco bathhouse: near-nakedness.)
Simple reason - it would not be a controllable threat and the precipice is all about complete control. In an impending threat of a civil war, all it it takes is for one person in one nameless city to brutalize someone and share the video, and then even all the WHs wont be able to stop what happens next.
Additionally, all that hatredness between brethern right before the Great Awakening would not be conducive to Great Awakening.
So I firmly standby my prediction that there will be no impending civil war. I know some people relish at the idea of one, even an impending one. Not me. I grew up amongst constant communal riots, and I wouldn't wish on my enemies.