"readers adding context" has been there ever since Elon came along.

Plenty of times our side has added context too. In these games, numbers matters.

a usatoday link was provided, but that hardly means they're the ones doing the checking

I don't understand why people can't see the voter fraud right in their face. It's EXTREMELY easy to prove.

Number of Registered voters = X

Number of votes counted = X + Y

Number of fraudulent votes = Y

If you have counted more votes than registered voters there is fraud and that election was rigged.

I'd rather everyone be given a chance to add context than nobody (or only one side censored)

the guy who made this post isnt unerstanding whats going on here obviously

USA Today is a Gannett publication as is The Arizona Republic. Anything about our elections is a super red flag to them--election fraud is the crime that must not be named in Arizona.

Community notes are about as accurate as a community edited encyclopedia (Wikipedia)

The “context” never contradicted the “illegally breaking into sealed election machines”, they just stated it was “standard procedure”

Can we add a community note to their community note, disputing their lies, with facts?

Kari Lake's response is now the top comment.

Link to post on X

"What is this @CommunityNotes , @elonmusk ?

None of this evidence has been presented before the Court yet.

My team & I can map exact movements in this video to specific KEY strokes because of Maricopa County's OWN data logs.

This is a smoking gun of election sabotage." - Kari Lake

😡

USA Today is like a rubber that breaks in the middle of the act...and there is NO way to put what US Today has turned into...

I pass by their HQ when I go south to Cocoa Beach...