She was on Trumps transition committee. Guardian article from January 2021:
Halper-Hayes, a former member of Trump’s White House transition team and visitor to his Mar-a-Lago resort, remains loyal nevertheless, insisting that it has never been hard to square support for Trump with traditional Republican values.
A lot of weight is added to her words by being on the transition committee, being invited to Mar-a-lago and Trump and Flynn retruthing her last interview on GBN. After having watched this older interview, Id have to say she may be a tool that the Patriots use to move the narrative along and present new information and information that they want focus on.
Not to mention the fact that she speaks to parts of the Plan we have discussed here for years, info that is not part of the daily conversation of the normies or pundits, making her either someone in close orbit to the President and the Q team or someone who reads here daily. Maybe both.
She reminds me of General McInerny, another straight shooter and truth teller who has been spurned for citing REALITY that stood in stark contrast to the MASS MEDIA'S GINNED UP BULLSHIT which stood as the accepted truth on innumerable subjects for so many years now.
If you can remember correctly, General McInerny was booted forever from FOX NEWS after mentioning that former Senator No-Name was given a nickname that basically translated to 'SongBird John' by the VC during his time as a POW.
FOX clutched their pearls just like when Trump had made similar insinuations a couple years before when No-Name was still alive (and not, you know, put to death for blatantly selling out the United States while working with Hillary and Obama yup what a great hero)
Still, you had on the basic level both AMERICAN AND VIETNAMESE VETERANS who shared THE SAME STORY AND CONCLUSIONS regarding his supposed ordeal and torture. Now when would you see these two groups agree, ever?
And wouldn't BASIC KNOWLEDGE OF THE RULES OF COMBAT or just PLAIN COMMON SENSE sort of dictate that when one captures a valuable piece, for example, the son of a 4 Star Admiral who is actively commanding the entire Pacific forces of your enemy that you would withhold or spare him the harshest treatments, or even the conditions of "normal" soldiers whom you've captured that way you might sustain mercy on your own companies of men should you be defeated and captured, and otherwise in the event victory comes close enough so as to be within your grasp, you might USEFULLY DEPLOY SUCH ASSETS in order to successfully gain a modicum of trust with your opponent and more easily bargain for him to cease aggression and surrender his cause?
But, y'know, just a fuckin' thought or whatevs!
Point is that people like General McInerny and Jan Halper-Hayes tell TOO MUCH TRUTH FOR THE MEDIA TO HANDLE and they CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO SPEAK using any of the MAINSTREAM CHANNELS, of which Dr. Jan herself makes note of them having all been totally compromised by Obama's repeal of Smith-Mundt, which existed since 1948!
Ever wonder why the "news" feels and sounds SO DIFFERENT from when you were a kid?
Because people like Dr. Jan and General Thomas McInerny would've been considered A-LISTERS back then due to their insider knowledge and unabashed nature of speaking the truth and only the truth. Instead we created a media environment where they are antithetical to what now passes as mainstream news, and consequently they are virtually PARIAHS.
Remember where you are: CLOWN WORLD.
In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king.
One thing strikes me here about this woman and her credibility. From the article I posted and these two videos published in the last year, you can deduce that Halper-Hayes has been close to events and Trump for at least 7 years. Someone with those credentials should probably be taken very seriously when she talks.
Of course you should always remain prepared for intentional disinformation to keep the enemy off balance and making mistakes.
Here is something that puzzles me. The regular and/or high volume posters here often talk about current events in terms of psy-op and information war. Being an agreed upon by all information war, we are witness to what Q said many times of moves and countermoves. One of the most effective tactics in this type of war is a feint. If you can get your opponent on the wrong foot you have a chance to wallop him.
I dont see anything I wrote in the last paragraph as controversial but when Patriots such as Greg Phillips make a claim or promise something and then fail to deliver, there is an outcry that the person is a paytriot and must be discredited and discarded never to be believed again. I realize that these outcries usually originate with the shills, but many here jump right in line. Emotional thinking, what we accuse the leftist normies of. And I get it to a point. We are all tired of this absurdity. But then you must apply logic.
Prudence would dictate that we here, people who think we are on the cutting edge and digital soldiers, wouldnt fall for this trap so easily. Perhaps keep it in mind for the time Future Proves Past, and dont discard neither the message nor the messenger. For me basically everyone is in this category except for Trump himself but a couple of the more prominent names are Elon and Greg Phillips. Ill wait to make my final judgements until this psyop is over and I can trust any of the information I see without being skeptical about its authenticity. Afterall the hopium could just be misdirection same as that disaster.
She was on Trumps transition committee. Guardian article from January 2021:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/15/kind-of-unbelievable-us-republicans-in-britain-mull-over-trump-impact
Read the entire article. It has a decidedly leftist slant of course but gives some background on Jan.
u/digaroundandfindout
A lot of weight is added to her words by being on the transition committee, being invited to Mar-a-lago and Trump and Flynn retruthing her last interview on GBN. After having watched this older interview, Id have to say she may be a tool that the Patriots use to move the narrative along and present new information and information that they want focus on.
Not to mention the fact that she speaks to parts of the Plan we have discussed here for years, info that is not part of the daily conversation of the normies or pundits, making her either someone in close orbit to the President and the Q team or someone who reads here daily. Maybe both.
Excellent finds! Superb work as usual my fren.
She reminds me of General McInerny, another straight shooter and truth teller who has been spurned for citing REALITY that stood in stark contrast to the MASS MEDIA'S GINNED UP BULLSHIT which stood as the accepted truth on innumerable subjects for so many years now.
If you can remember correctly, General McInerny was booted forever from FOX NEWS after mentioning that former Senator No-Name was given a nickname that basically translated to 'SongBird John' by the VC during his time as a POW.
FOX clutched their pearls just like when Trump had made similar insinuations a couple years before when No-Name was still alive (and not, you know, put to death for blatantly selling out the United States while working with Hillary and Obama yup what a great hero)
But the reality of course, is FAR MORE COMPLICATED, as some of the people from the war STRONGLY ASSERT their recollections from the war and shared that McCain was NEVER tortured and of the fews POWs willing to share the truth about what truly happened in Hanoi Hilton with regards to No Name, well some were likely victims of a false flag operation during the Clinton years.
Still, you had on the basic level both AMERICAN AND VIETNAMESE VETERANS who shared THE SAME STORY AND CONCLUSIONS regarding his supposed ordeal and torture. Now when would you see these two groups agree, ever?
And wouldn't BASIC KNOWLEDGE OF THE RULES OF COMBAT or just PLAIN COMMON SENSE sort of dictate that when one captures a valuable piece, for example, the son of a 4 Star Admiral who is actively commanding the entire Pacific forces of your enemy that you would withhold or spare him the harshest treatments, or even the conditions of "normal" soldiers whom you've captured that way you might sustain mercy on your own companies of men should you be defeated and captured, and otherwise in the event victory comes close enough so as to be within your grasp, you might USEFULLY DEPLOY SUCH ASSETS in order to successfully gain a modicum of trust with your opponent and more easily bargain for him to cease aggression and surrender his cause?
But, y'know, just a fuckin' thought or whatevs!
Point is that people like General McInerny and Jan Halper-Hayes tell TOO MUCH TRUTH FOR THE MEDIA TO HANDLE and they CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO SPEAK using any of the MAINSTREAM CHANNELS, of which Dr. Jan herself makes note of them having all been totally compromised by Obama's repeal of Smith-Mundt, which existed since 1948!
Ever wonder why the "news" feels and sounds SO DIFFERENT from when you were a kid?
Because people like Dr. Jan and General Thomas McInerny would've been considered A-LISTERS back then due to their insider knowledge and unabashed nature of speaking the truth and only the truth. Instead we created a media environment where they are antithetical to what now passes as mainstream news, and consequently they are virtually PARIAHS.
Remember where you are: CLOWN WORLD.
In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king.
Just some thoughts.
One thing strikes me here about this woman and her credibility. From the article I posted and these two videos published in the last year, you can deduce that Halper-Hayes has been close to events and Trump for at least 7 years. Someone with those credentials should probably be taken very seriously when she talks.
Of course you should always remain prepared for intentional disinformation to keep the enemy off balance and making mistakes.
Here is something that puzzles me. The regular and/or high volume posters here often talk about current events in terms of psy-op and information war. Being an agreed upon by all information war, we are witness to what Q said many times of moves and countermoves. One of the most effective tactics in this type of war is a feint. If you can get your opponent on the wrong foot you have a chance to wallop him.
I dont see anything I wrote in the last paragraph as controversial but when Patriots such as Greg Phillips make a claim or promise something and then fail to deliver, there is an outcry that the person is a paytriot and must be discredited and discarded never to be believed again. I realize that these outcries usually originate with the shills, but many here jump right in line. Emotional thinking, what we accuse the leftist normies of. And I get it to a point. We are all tired of this absurdity. But then you must apply logic.
Prudence would dictate that we here, people who think we are on the cutting edge and digital soldiers, wouldnt fall for this trap so easily. Perhaps keep it in mind for the time Future Proves Past, and dont discard neither the message nor the messenger. For me basically everyone is in this category except for Trump himself but a couple of the more prominent names are Elon and Greg Phillips. Ill wait to make my final judgements until this psyop is over and I can trust any of the information I see without being skeptical about its authenticity. Afterall the hopium could just be misdirection same as that disaster.
Thank you!