Jesus came with a message of love, the God of the Jews is clearly a savage who is concentrating on domination over humanity using his “chosen”
As his tools to fulfill this goal. Q says it’s biblical for a reason…. Nothing in Jesus’s message matches the savagery of the Old Testament and that God. The only part of the New Testament is the parts that come after the gospel. And I believe that was entirely on purpose to bring back the idea that Jesus was the son of Yahweh and thus establishing the tribe as dominant once more. The gospel contradicts the nature of Yahweh in the Old Testament. The first canonical New Testament Bible was exactly about this.
There's a nuance to it, the relation of the OT and NT, but I'll let it go for now, not ready to debate but can you link me to the first canonical NT? never heard of this
There is no physical book. The only things that exist is the commentary made in opposition because it compares the two view points, so we can still know what the books contained due to the comparison. Everything done by Marcion was burned and destroyed.. as usual …
Jesus believed Gods laws of the Old Testament. He didn’t abandon them.
Proverbs 13:24. About not sparing the rod.
By what you’ve posted here you’re very confused about several things, mentioned already. Almost scary.
Jesus never calls himself Yahweh or Elohim or anything the Jews called their God. The only similarity is the burning bush and God saying say that I am sent you. And Jesus telling the Jewish leaders that even before Abraham was born I Am. That’s it. Jesus never calls his father by the name of the God of the Jews, mind you… he was Jewish himself.
Jesus came with a message of love, the God of the Jews is clearly a savage who is concentrating on domination over humanity using his “chosen” As his tools to fulfill this goal. Q says it’s biblical for a reason…. Nothing in Jesus’s message matches the savagery of the Old Testament and that God. The only part of the New Testament is the parts that come after the gospel. And I believe that was entirely on purpose to bring back the idea that Jesus was the son of Yahweh and thus establishing the tribe as dominant once more. The gospel contradicts the nature of Yahweh in the Old Testament. The first canonical New Testament Bible was exactly about this.
There's a nuance to it, the relation of the OT and NT, but I'll let it go for now, not ready to debate but can you link me to the first canonical NT? never heard of this
There is no physical book. The only things that exist is the commentary made in opposition because it compares the two view points, so we can still know what the books contained due to the comparison. Everything done by Marcion was burned and destroyed.. as usual …
https://archive.org/details/TheGospelOfTheLord
When my children are misbehaving, I yell at them, and verbally and physically punish them.
When they are being sweet and kind, I buy them gifts, give them lots of physical and verbal love.
Am I two different entities?
Your argument does not prove your hypothesis.
At what point did Jesus tell you to punish your children to discipline them by physical harm.
Jesus believed Gods laws of the Old Testament. He didn’t abandon them. Proverbs 13:24. About not sparing the rod. By what you’ve posted here you’re very confused about several things, mentioned already. Almost scary.
Jesus never calls himself Yahweh or Elohim or anything the Jews called their God. The only similarity is the burning bush and God saying say that I am sent you. And Jesus telling the Jewish leaders that even before Abraham was born I Am. That’s it. Jesus never calls his father by the name of the God of the Jews, mind you… he was Jewish himself.